converse

My remarks of asking you to prove what you have written will run people off. I simply asked you to prove proof of what you alleged and you cannot. So you get all in a tiz and accuse me of some agenda. I reply to posts like these because they are full of misinformation. The question I have is what is it you think we're all “taking"? The bill does pretty much a specific thing. There are reasons why some are concerned and why others welcome it. I'll give two examples: 1) A child porn server has been set up on company A's network. Child porn pictures are being uploaded by

You do not understand the bill. Your scenario could happen now under current law. This bill has nothing to do with it nor would make it easier for a company to do it.

What are you talking about? I simply responded to your comment about not turning this into a partisan politics thread with a comment from you and your boy. BTW... I am still waiting on the actual text from that bill that allows a business to shut down a parenting blog. Had a chance to look that up yet?

Really????

Where in the bill does it say it allows a company to shut down a parents blogging website? What you have above doesn't even come close.

Where in the bill does it say it can do that? From this bill, please post a copy of the text that verifies what you have posted above.

The source was in the actual article. Did you look at it before going in to the drivel above? I'll make it easy for you this time. From here HHS considered three possibilities for data collection: (1) A centralized approach in which issuers submit raw claims data sets to HHS; (2) an intermediate State-level approach in which issuers submit raw claims data sets to the State government, or the entity responsible for administering the risk adjustment process at the State level; and (3) a distributed approach in which each issuer must reformat its own data to map correctly to t

In a proposed rule from Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the federal government is demanding insurance companies submit detailed health care information about their patients. You want to try another attempt at spinning that again? Your first attempt failed miserably...

Behind brusters on 278 there is a hanger that houses helicopters. I noticed one a couple days ago that looked military. I have seen it flying over the hours the past couple days. It is black and medium sized.

Where was this uproar when the government took control of our medical information?? Why weren't you calling congress names then and damning your democrat party?

Maybe the tantrum before the thread closing???

There are many times when I think "glass houses" while reading topics here.

It is more than the largest. There are local small businesses that have a lot of skeletons they'd never like to see out of the closets...

Those are yearly/annual wages. $1.50 an hour = 19.79 Peso. 8 hours in a day = 158.28 Peso. 5 days a week = 791.40 Peso 50 weeks = 39,570 Peso.

I've read the thread and can't put a firm finger on what it is you are trying to argue for or against? You seem unhappy that Wal-Mart is paying a certain wage for its position in Mexico. Is that it? Or are you really trying to make the argument that Wal-Mart should be paying wages in Mexico on the same scale as in the US? Honestly it doesn’t appear you know what you want to argue about other than wages are lower in Mexico. I'm sure you looked in to all of this before posting, but to fill others in: Minimum annual wage in Mexico is about 16,000 pesos Annual wage with two weeks off m

I'd move if needed. There are lots of places where a job can still be found. Few of them are local.

My goal is to remove myself as much as possible from the "Internet". I work from home a bunch and need it for that, but the rest of the time is wasted on things like p.com and the like. Seldom does anything productive come out if it. I've gotten better but still have a lomng way to go.

Wonder how they came up with that price? Seems way high from what I have seen of the place and the current land prices.

If you could prove the other person was exceeding the speed limit by a bunch you might be able to fight for shared responsibility. The person being under the influence doesn’t change the reason the accident happened. Sounds like its time to pay the piper and accept it as a learning experience.

Surely there was an EOC complaint filed if this is a legitimate complaint. Wonder why no mention of it. It appears a single email is all the evidence they have and I’d be real interested to see the entire thing and how the quoted text worked within the entire email. There is no mention of what he was fired for which is more important than who hired the supervisor... It takes a long detailed paper trail to fire someone today without the risk of getting sued and even then there is always a reason to worry. Supervisors don’t usually have the ability to fire without the blessings of HR. We wo

Do you put any thought in to what you write? You wonder what the obsession with guns is yet say you're going out to buy a few more cases of ammo for your several guns... Really?? I mean come on dude... Why don't you answer the question yourself?? Once you do ask youself if you're an SOB.

Banning wind turbines would save half a million birds and several golden eagles a year in the USA.

My field is hurting for people. The problem is you have to have good experience to find a job. No one is willing to train so they poach people from other companies on a regular basis and it keeps the cycle going. I'm salary and everyone I know in my filed is salary. It is very common to work well over 40 hours a week and there is never overtime pay. It’s the way it is and I accept. I'm from the Louisville area and jobs are still good there. I started my work life in the construction industry and have seen the shift in the work force from 20-25 years ago to the present. Back then I never sa

How can you not know by now that the additional supply and lessened risk of drilling here will never drop the price gasoline? I'm sure a liberal will pop in and correct you for trying to use common sense...

Not according to the definition you gave above. Much like sexual harassment, stalking defined above is up to the victim to define it definition. Even if you personally don't believe you're stalking someone you are guilty because the other party thought you were. So if this kid has the legal right to bash the head in of this guy then anyone who feels threaten has the same right. So again, using your definition of stalking, youd fully support the too right for someone physically assault you because they believed you were following them? I am certain Zimmerman felt threated while he