stercus tauri

Sparks from the grinding axe?

And Lots to Do has thus far been shown to not know what he was talking about. Remember Lots to Do said the banks would be nationalized by March of this year. He also said there was coming a Black Swan event (never happened) and inflation (nope) along with higher interest rates (kidding, right?) adn the market was extremely fragile. And he said there would be a 20% decline in the second half of 2009 and recovery wouldn't happen to 2010, but we have the numbers say the recovery began the very month he was saying the bottom had not been hit and stagflation was coming. Then again Blazing Saddles s

Obama is not in this election so why do you keep bringing him up except to tarnish another candidate by association? The state representatives have nothing to do with the policies of the Federal government.

I just read over that whole thread he posted back in March. Looks like he was right and everybody else was wrong in that whole thread. I guess we will see if he or you are right in 2011.

No, the banks didn't put the foreclosures on hold because of a "technicality" but because these banks were committing perjury by signing off on the foreclosure documents when the documents were not correct. Some of the banks didn't even own the mortgage they were foreclosing on. You really should read up on this. Second, the tax cuts will not expire but are set to expire. Please don't promote fear mongering for a political appetite. For most people, the tax cuts stay in place, though dividend taxes will rise. We know the cuts for the upper wage earners will expire because $700B in tax reve

Why vote for Avery? Well, he has not been arrested even once. He has not had a felony problem. He has real solutions to collect more taxes that are currently being skimmed of the top by businesses (as Alabama already proved was being done). He has fresh ideas, not platitudes that he is a "tea party conservative." He knows about history. He can discuss various topics intellectually. None of those things Paulette can do.

I'm thinking you're not understanding the issue here. The "revenue stream" is already there because the state sales tax already exists.This is a different way of collecting those taxes so the money actually makes it to the state instead of in the business' off-the-books bank account.

I want to clarify what you're saying here. Are you saying that the economy is about to nosedive? Could you be more specific?

Sure! I missed those two days. I didn't say YOU, now did I? I said OTHERS but YOU wouldn't admit that OTHERS were posting out of politics, now would you? You are saying the market is not happy with the Democratic policies? Really?

Lemme say this really slow for you. The point was the politics. Actually, those other two days only make my point even better. There was ONE day with similar losses but THREE days with those type of upside returns. And not a single word about that. Could it be the politics as a reason for no one to give the Democrats credit?

And the point of my post is the politics ...

Try again. There were no days with bigger losses or bigger gains than the days bracketing that 55 day spread. Really. Try again. So if you're saying I was trying to "start something" with my touting the good day, why didn't you say anything about the original post that was trying to "start something" on the bad day? How many standards do you have, again?

What is your malfunction? I pointed out that people were blaming the big DROP on Democrats. Now I know this is hard but stay with me here. If the DROP is blamed on Democrats, why did no one post anything about the big GAIN and give some credit to the Democrats? Now how hard is that? Room temperature IQ can follow that, but I am going to be bet you still have a problem with it.

Because those 55 days had NOTHING to do with the point of my post but you have no clue what it is about. Why am I surprised?

When he was only 20? Maybe.

In 20 years, come back on paulding.com and let us know how cash has done for you during those two decades verses the market. After all, you missed a 5.67% return in 55 days by being in cash. Panic is not an investment strategy.

What if the charges are not dropped? Let's assume she is arrested and is found guilty for a felony. Would that change your mind in any way at all? I'm being dead serious because I honestly don't think it would.

I'm not either, but I get really tired of people pandering with the politics, blaming things on politicians when they have no control of it one way or the other. They do so out of intentional or willful ignorance.

That poll has nothing to do with it. All you have to do is see the market is up way before that poll. The numbers are good, not the political swings, and that makes the market go up. Of course, it goes down, too, but it has nothing to do with politics.

You really should do research before you say something else that makes you look really ignorant. My post showed how people play politics when it is down by blaming Democrats but don't give them any credit when it goes up. In those 55 days you spoke of, the market is up 5.67%. Do you give the Democrats any credit for that? They shouldn't get any credit for it, but if people are going to blame them for the market being down they should give some credit when it is up.

I'm certain there are no NASTY attacks towards Democrats or Obama on here.

If she had plead guilty, would you people then say she has a problem? Seriously. If she pleads guilty, would you people say the lady shouldn't be elected?

Wow. The market was up nearly 200 points today. Not a word? Does Pelosi and Reid get any credit today when they caught some blame in August? Or was that August day just an excuse by some to shoot the political cannons?

Annual modem malfunction. Will call them tomorrow and get a new one.

Here's a good list.