Nice Green

Bolded for emphasis. We'll mark this "Exhibit A." As for the photo, not sure what he has to do with the story at Glock. But then again, I'm used to you not staying on track.

Found another dead horse to keep beating, have you?

"The lack of ethics officials display" ... again, something that has NOTHING to do with the topic. Do you really want to stay seated at the computer and continue this? You're only digging yourself a deeper hole.

Do you get paid for every time you use the phrase "biased hit job" or something? And how does the "stand your ground law" have ANYTHING to do with this incident?

Maybe if you didn't bring unrelated topics into threads, he'd have a bit more respect for you. You're bringing up something that has nothing to do with the topic YOU started: Someone getting shot at a middle school. Markdavd hits the nail on the head, because I'm pretty sure when people see your topics, they turn away because they know you'll go back to your old hat again and again. And you've been harping on Georgia's "report card" for what, a year, a year and a half now? You've run it into the ground and all the way to China, and you've said nothing about actually trying to do someth

Does anyone else smell the irony here?

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you made yet another blanket statement. But if I had to guess, I'd imagine that good Christians are more apt to standing up and actually doing something than you are.

It seems you're implying that religious people are stupid. I'm sure quite a few people would take offense to that.

You're no "change agent" if you only choose to remain on your butt and post on here. You're quick to knock people in the Bible Belt, in the South and in Georgia, but you're no better than anyone there if you're not willing to stand up and take any sort of action. If you cared about the "integrity report card" or anything you post on here ad infinitum, you'd be doing something other than continually posting on the topics.

You talk a big game (well, just a lot of it) against the "status quo," but never once have I seen you say that you're going out and DOING SOMETHING about it. All you do is continually make these near-nonsensical posts about it. YOU are the status quo, but you're afraid to admit it or believe that by staying at your computer and making these posts, you're actually doing something, when in reality you're not. You admitted last year that you don't vote, so in politics, you're just fine with the status quo. Do you volunteer with group? If you spent as much time volunteering as you did

I'll still gladly take your Mt. Dew codes, folks. And I want to thank BACONFMLY03 for sending me two codes over the last few weeks. On a related topic, does anyone collect Coca-Cola codes? I'm not looking for them, but if anyone takes them, I might send some over to you when I get them (I typically buy a couple of 12-packs a month).

Yes, we need more members of a group that: * launches denial of service attacks against government websites, organizations, and even providers of websites to small businesses. * committed a cyber-attack against the Pentagon. * launched cyber-attacks against the Westboro Baptist Church and hacked into the account of one of its members. (And yes, I know what the church is and while I do not support them, they're still at least somewhat protected by the First Amendment at this point in time.) I'm glad someone's standing up for these outstanding folks, TP.

You're beginning to appreciate a group that: * launches denial of service attacks against government websites, organizations, and even providers of websites to small businesses? * committed a cyber-attack against the Pentagon? * launched cyber-attacks against the Westboro Baptist Church and hacked into the account of one of its members? (And yes, I know what the church is and while I do not support them, they're still at least somewhat protected by the First Amendment at this point in time.) So this is a group you're in support of?

Authors like Dr. Phil buy advertising so you'll buy his book! Oh no! And haven't you said several times that advertising is your game? I guess that makes you part of the problem—you're trying to program all of us. Thanks for giving us a long, drawn-out definition of advertising, a concept that every normal adult already understands.

So classy. And on Christmas, too.

Thanks! There's codes in specially marked 12-packs, and under the orange caps on 20 oz bottles and 2-liters.

This may be a long shot, but just wondering if anyone drinks Mountain Dew (or Diet Mt. Dew or any variation of Dew) or consumes Doritos and has no use for the Halo 4 codes that the products include. If you've got codes to spare, would you kindly PM them to me?

You talk a big game about conservatives this and conservatives that, but when someone calls you out on it, you either try to change the topic or claim that your character is being attacked. You're really comparing yourself to someone wrongfully accused of murder? Stop playing the victim card. If you can't back up your claims, then either admit you can't prove them or don't make them at all. And don't whine when someone calls you out on it.

Wow, you're really stretching trying to compare video games to conservatism. So it's funny, then, that Barack Obama spent campaign money for ads in video games and that more undecided voters who took part in an Xbox poll favored Obama during one October's town hall debate. And is it just me, or is this a thinly veiled attempt to link the school shooting to conservatives? Surely there was no ulterior motive in starting this thread the day after the shooting, right?

Ah, the president must've said it! Well, that settles it, because we know that presidents and politicians never spin, give half-truths or tell lies.

Ah, your "integrity study," which also has no bearing on the issue you brought up in your initial post. And you continue to say Georgia pays less money, yet you can't provide any statistics to show that Georgia or any right-to-work state pays less money than non-right-to-work states. If you had integrity, you'd either back up your statement or admit that you have no proof. And I'm sorry if you feel I'm "attacking your character" by saying that. You're showing your own character by spouting off things without backing them up. And if you can't stand people calling you out when you do so,

This is your "proof" that right to work states pay workers less?

Right To Work States Give People The Right To Work For Less MONEY You began the topic and yet you never showed anything to prove that workers in right-to-work states earn less than their counterparts in non right-to-work states. There's a few possibilities—you made a statement that you couldn't back up (whether you're claiming it yourself or just quoting what someone else said and don't have the facts to go with it), or you're lying. I can't prove you're lying, but if you were bold enough to make the claim in the title of the thread, you should be able to back it up

Good thing I wasn't sarcastic in my previous response... So your "cut down artists" posts only come once a month...is that because you make your other posts on wealth envy and how corrupt you believe Georgia/the South is on a daily basis?

Awesome. I was waiting for the monthly "cut down artist" thread. Good job, TP.