Nitro

I guess your high education level prevents you from seeing funny sarcasm too. Lowrider said to remind her to not open the thread. cptlo306 was being funny by "reminding" her... as she requested. Sheesh! :rolleyes:

And what are the facts? You have a list of people you are planning to shoot?

Yeah, I'm sure you're a crack shot. Don't make insinuations that you can't back up. Bahahahaha... nice one. That was one of the best jokes I've heard all day!

I could care less what you prefer. If you don't like them, don't read them.

Everyone please note, that zoo-nochio is a damned liar and wants me to prove something to her when she flat out refused to prove her education credentials. She won't even tell what "university" she attended and has a degree in courses that don't exist. And have said it once, twice, and now a third time. I will provide what my source is if you provide where you got your phoney education and degrees that don't exist. I have it ready to go. All you have to do is provide yours... You won't because you're a liar. Yep, I made it up. The quotes are indeed all over the internet that Hami

In other words, you don't have the degrees and education that you say you do. Once again, I did not get the quotes from the internet. I don't give a flying truck about what the links on the internet say. I did not get the quotes from the internet. I did not make a mistake, you're just too damn stupid to understand that not everyone gets their information from the internet, like you do. You remind me of that All State commercial where the girl says, "well it must be true, because I saw it on the internet." Once again, for your puny little brain. My information DOES NOT C

Honestly, I don't see a problem with that, in its basic form. However, as the government will typically do, they will then see this as an opportunity to 'tax' people for utilizing the background check. So, I am a hobby shooter and a competition shooter. So, you, who may want to go out and shoot a lot can only buy 'X' number of rounds, but because I am a competition shooter, I can apply to buy more? I have a problem with that. I haven't always been a competition shooter, however, I have always been a hobby shooter. Just in hobby shooting, I go through five to six thousand

LOL! If you think I have anger issues from something you said, you really are foolish. There is NOTHING that YOU can say that will get me angry. I "play" on the internet and little things that trolls like you say are meaningless to me. And no, it wasn't a typo, as I explained above, it was well intended to type "winch." Link please? Link please? That's why your ignorance shows so much. You get your information from the internet, I don't. My information didn't come from the internet. I'll tell you what. You answer the questions that were asked of you earlier, that

If you don't understand the word, don't ask someone to correct something that isn't incorrect. I suggest you look up "winch" in the term of middle English... I said "winch" and meant "winch." In layman's terms, it essentially means 'ugly troll.' The term "wench" is not a derogatory word. It's simply middle English for "young woman" or "peasant woman." The word "winch" on the other hand...

That is exactly what I meant. Again, with all that education you supposedly have and you think that is how you reference a citation? Sorry, but no, that is NOT what that means. Go back and study the English language a little bit. When you cite someone, you do so at the end of what you are citing. With all that education, I would have thought you had to write an thesis or a dissertation for all those graduate level degrees that you have. And I would surely have thought you know how to properly cite a person. Let me give you a little education. Whem you state you

Sorry, I didn't get caught. But it was nice of you to change the quote of what I actually said. As I stated previously, I never said those quotes were IN the Federalist Papers. PLEASE learn to read. I said that Hamilton was quoted saying those referencing the Federalist Papers. If you READ, I quoted the particular section of the paper No, sorry, I didn't get caught now knowing that the Federalist Papers were published after the Constitution was written. Your stupidity is showing. Sorry, but there IS a reason to get personal with moron's like you who cont

It's funny how all the quotes that the founding fathers used have all been fabricated. That's all you ever say... "those quotes are spurious," "he never said that," "that was never their intent,"... People who don't have training huh? I'm willing to bet that I have a HELL of a lot more Constitutional education than you do. You are a damned fool that knows nothing of the Constitution or it's ideals and principles, even though you like to think you do. But I'll do this one for you. #28, by Hamilton. His quote was describing this portion of the essay: "If the representat

Uh... Well yeah. If they lie you to, then you did not knowingly sell it to a convicted felon. I won't sell a firearm to someone that doesn't show me a valid drivers license and weapons permit. You also have the option of telling them to meet you at the Sheriff's Office and asking them to make sure the person is acceptable to sell the firearm too. Uh.. yes, there is. If the convicted felon lives in the same household as you and you have a firearm onsite, they can be charged with possession, unless it can be proven that the firearm, in no way could be obtained by

I didn't say they were IN the papers. I said Hamilton quoted that phrase. His quote was based on the writings IN the papers. See the part where I stated, "Those were quotes directly from the authors who wrote the particular essays." You even quoted me saying that. Listen, you pompous winch, you don't know what I did. I DID NOT cut and paste from the internet, regardless of what you think. The Quotes can easily be found because they were stated by the individual. That's what a quote is. How I present the quote was my own words. Show me the EXACT full quote, EXACTLY a

I don't know where you got that little piece of information, but nothing is further from the truth!

Those WERE from the Federalist Papers and it was not cut and pasted from any biased sources. Those were quotes directly from the authors who wrote the particular essays. I see you didn't get your word of the week this week. You are still stuck on "spurious." You about the most ignorant individual I have ever know when it comes to the meaning of the Constitution and where it was drawn from. I'm willing to bet you had no clue as to what the Federalist Papers were until I mentioned them. I have the full library of Federalist Papaers sitting right next to me in my office. No

Bahahahahahahaha! THAT is a good one! Thanks for the laugh!

No, in Georgia, it is not illegal to carry inside a bank, as long as you posses a valid weapons license. A bank is a private business and just like any other business, has the right to not allow firearms. If you carry inside and it's posted, there is no legal binding to being posted. If they ask you to leave and promptly do so, you will have no problem. If you fail to leave the property, you can be charged with criminal trespass. There are very few states that actually have a law that prohibits firearms inside of banks, but there are some that do. If you travel to a state wher

Yes, that is partially correct. They were also talking about defense against a tyrannical government and they specifically talked about a government becoming of one they had just broken away from... Read the federalist papers. They are the documents that the Constitution was drawn from and they are very clear as to the intentions of the founding fathers. Here are just a couple of the essays of the Federalist Papers that reference the purpose of what became the 2nd Amendment: Essay # 28, Alexander Hamilton expressed that "when a government betrays the people by amassing too mu

Really? A militia IS about protecting against government tyranny. You are correct. The ballot box is the place to make the changes. However, the Constitution provides for the protection for if/when the time comes that the ballot box fails to work. We are still a VERY young country. Many countries have tried the form of government we have and have failed only to fall in to dictatorship. The 2nd Amendment is there to provide provisions for the people to form a militia in the event that the government totally fails, the ballot box doesn't work, and a forceful restructuring

I suggest you do some research on the government that we have in this country. The government is NOT here to do what we want. We are a republic. That means, we elect officials that we believe will do the best job in doing what is best for the overall good of the people without violating the Constitution and the protections set forth therein. This is not a "mob rules" democracy system, like so many of our ignorant politicians (and especially news media) constantly call it. We elect our representatives to do what is in the best interest, not necessarily what we want. If w

It's a "Georgia Weapons License."... and it covers all weapons, not just firearms. It's not illegal to carry in to a place where it's posted, "No firearms allowed." You can most certainly carry in a public park or any state or national park. That was adopted with SB 308 back in 2010. You can also carry in to a mall or any other private establishment. The posting of a "no firearms allowed" is not legally binding and they cannot have you arrested, simply for that. If you carry in to a private establishment that is posted, all the owner/manager can do is ask you to leave. If you

The sentence above is coming from someone who failed to use commas in their sentence and who starts the sentence with "Guess," instead of "I guess." If you are going to complain about someone's grammar, I would think you would be inclined to use it correctly.

There. I fixed it for you.

Pssst! Hey, let me educate you a little bit on grammar: As I stated before, someone with your education should KNOW that there should be a comma after "retaliation" and after "attacks" to show that the you were the one that did not retaliate. As it reads now, you are asking people to notice that THEY did not retaliate to attacks that YOU made. I would think that such an educated person would know how to use comma's. Oh wait, let me guess... Your phone did it? As far as your intention of the incorrect sentence, my response is: "Wow, there's a first time for everyt