TJB

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."- Sinclair Lewis

I'm so glad things turned out as well as they could in this situation.

There was a great South Park episode making fun of Kanye.

I just had a thought, scary as it may seem, but does Hobby Lobby's insurance cover fertility treatments? If so, and a woman gets pregnant and has multiple fetuses, doctors often engage in selective reduction. Is that considered aboortzion and would HL object?

I knew I had bad gas, but through the computer. Sorry.

I'm glad there's some humor in a thread where we disagree.

If Hobby Lobby is really concerned about contraception, why are they investing in these companies? http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/hobby-lobby-retirement-plan-invested-emergency-contraception-and-aboortzion-drug-makers

I've heard of people using it, even if they don't really need it. However, if it doesn't go down,this is the treatment. http://nbc10.healthology.net/erectile-dysfunction/erectile-dysfunction-information/article3826.htm

This is about big companies making sure they have a large pool of unskilled workers they can pay low salaries. I work in an alternative school, and there are kids that were better off not being born; instead they will have a life of misery because they were unwanted and not taken care of. However, these unwanted children will fill our jails and prisons and the for profit incarceration industry will make a killing.

aboortzion should be free, especially for tea-party members.

What's next? Can a company owned by a Jehova's Witness refuse to cover blood transfusions. Will a company owned by Scientologists refuse to pay for ant-depressants? This decision sets a bad precedent.

Welcome to Sharia Law.

I'm so sorry you and your family are going through this.

That is sad. I'll be 48 in September; I thought she was older than that. Far too young to have suffered like that.

There is a facebook page titled Eric Cantor is a douchebag. Perhaps people can send used condoms to Lindsey Graham, and Marcus Bachmann but they might like that.

This had to be the worst name for a diet product ever.

I stand corrected. No Republican said a thing about the number of executive orders passed by GWB during his presidency. Obama has used this far less than any president in recent history.

Why is it wrong? Obama has issued far less orders than the previous presidents, since Reagan. Is that not true?

I did, but Bush issued 291 executive orders and Obama has issued 168, so actually, Obama has cut down on the numbers of executive orders than the previous administration.

There is little to choose from, and implying everyone is looking for a handout, in my opinion, misses the larger point, which is our government and most governments are controlled by it's wealthiest citizens and the businesses they own. This is fascism, not capitalism and government can't do what is right because they answer to the people who paid the most money to get them elected. I'm talking about the previous president who issued far more executive orders than Obama. Nobody said a thing.

The previous president issued far more executive orders than Obama, yet nobody said a damn thing. Executive Orders: Washington - Obama http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php

The country is in this shape today because elected officials are bought and paid for by special interest groups. Once politicians become part of the system, they trade their political connections to become lobbyists and bribe other elected officials. Politicians don't answer to constituents, they answer to the people holding the money and do nothing, yet they reap the benefits of government service in the form of lifetime pensions and business and political connections to make them far wealthier than they did entering office. Politicians spend vast sums of money to get elected, yet bitch about

The race pimps are at it again.

Is it possible for any politician to be as ideologically pure as we all would like, regardless of party? At some point, isn't the the job of government governing to solve problems, allocate resources, and compromise with the opposing party? If that isn't the case, we are left with an endless cycle of gridlock and one party looking to screw the other and while it may stay ideologically pure, they aren't doing a damn thing for it's citizens. Both major parties are bought and paid for and with Citizens United, the average voter has little to no impact on affecting change. Even if a libertarian c

Shouldn't the oil companies pay for the negative externalities incurred by drilling? How much are we really paying for a gallon of gas, after adding up the cost of a military presence in the Middle East, cleaning up oil spills, and subsidizing these oil companies with our tax dollars?