Cabe

No, what she has said over and over is that she can't vote in District 19's race. You should learn the district a bit better. District 19 only represents the eastern side of Paulding.

Wrong again.

We went today, but watched from 41. Great show! Your pics are better than mine. But I was using the little point and shoot.

Good for you. I thought it couldn't get much worse. But each year continues to surprise me. fixed it for ya Good thing I wasn't drinking my tea. I would've spewed.

I'm not even sure if I count among those you'd consider "decent", however, my comments were simply pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of Surepip's statements. If that makes me "indecent" then so be it. Will you please read Pubby's comment where he made the edit? See below. Wrong again.

You kill me, Surepip. You have numerous posts over the last several days saying we shouldn't make Will "guilty by association" then start a thread that applies that very same principle. "Will only took teamsters and union money because he needed it to launch his campaign" but Paulette shouldn't accept local money, I guess. Will's best friend can work to get Obama elected, but Paulette shouldn't have any association with local GOP members. Can you even see your own hypocrisy? Or are you too blinded by your hatred?

I think your topic header is deliberately deceitful and misleading. But yeah, that's your MO.

Those are great pics! Looks like you had a great seat!

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see the same question again. In a county where the majority are conservative, I think her questions are legitimate. Particularly in light of the fact that most in this state wanted Obama's healthcare plan challenged because we simply can't afford that monstrosity.

When he registered for this race, he registered his occupation as a "student". Nothing else, just student. When asked about that he responded that he didn't know that information would be public. I believe he later changed that. And I don't think the question was far-fetched. Very close friends often join the same groups.

Those are beautiful! What a thoughtful surprise! Happy Anniversary!

Pubby, all I can speak to is my own personal experience having just lived to tell about an IRS audit of my 2007 and 2008 returns. According to the IRS the accountant did make an error which will cost ME approx $250. However, that doesn't absolve me of the guilt of the error or the payments due. Guess who's responsibility it is to review the return prepared by the accountant? MINE! Does the IRS think I attempted to defraud them? No. They didn't even suggest that. All they really care about is if I pay the $250, including the penalties and interest which will continue to accrue daily

Oh! You want PARENTS to take responsibility! It's that new pic, sorry. You want us to talk to them too? Teenagers?!?!?! RU serious?

Deal has already released more than is required. Barnes is making a big deal out of nothing.

Psst! Mention that to Pubby. He's the one that keeps blaming Roy's accountant. (And I truly do not care about Roy's personal tax returns.)

Welcome to P.com. I, for one, am impressed with the forum you got this one in.

I haven't commented because I'm still trying to figure out what a slide lock on the outside would do other than keep the folks inside.

And I love you for blaming the accountant when the IRS specifically says you can't do that.

So if Deal has an error, he's a crook. Barnes has an error, it's an accountant's mistake. Gotcha BTW, during MY IRS audit, I was gently informed by the IRS rep that any error on the part of my accountant was MY error.

I caught some of the practice yesterday! Amazing! Love the Blue Angels!

Mr. Politics said: Really? Paulette caught a lot of grief here because some thought she was doing that to Daniel Stout (although I don't believe that was proven). I agree. Based upon all the threads, all I get from them is "he's not Paulette, or the "old regime".

Then you haven't been reading Surepip's posts.

Very hard when those commenting do not understand the difference between nolo contendere and nolle prosequi.

Yes, I did. And very vocally. And I've apologized.