Foxmeister

I had every intent of voting a write-in for the District 19 race. If anyone recalls, I said neither Avery or Braddock would get my vote. While I stood in line to vote, I had a lot of time to think. What kept coming to my mind was some of the off the wall remarks some Avery supporters were saying in this forum and how cocky and sure Avery was going to win. These Avery supporters were very insultive to others with opposing view points on this forum. They thought for sure Avery would win. One even made the remark you have to do whatever it takes to ensure the other candidate loses. I thoug

Are you really surprised by his reaction to Avery losing? I'm not at surprised by it. Remember why he started this thread? He told us he wanted us around so he could gloat if Avery and Barnes won. Also look at his response about being overconfident when someone said Braddock and Deal would win. It appears to me, feelip was way overconfient. I actually find this very funny.

All because they reduced the number of voting sites and reduced the number of machines because the last election was "poorly" attended.

Just saw on the news, the line at Russom is now 4 hours long.

The line is now at least 2 hrs long at Russom.

I'm retired Army and deployed three times. I'm telling you it's fine for you to tell a poll worker so you don't have to wait in line while ill. Your vote is important.

I'm not talking just about the District 19 race. You admitted in another discussion Barnes misrepresented the truth about Deal and rape victims. You justified it by saying one should do whatever it takes to beat the other guy. Someone supporting Avery; perhaps Avery himself created a website using Braddock's name in the url that included her mugshots. Was that really necessary? She was most likely humiliated enough when her arrests were made public. That alone caused her political damage; but was benefit was there to doing this other than to cause more humiliation other than to do whatev

If you agree, then why did you say you have to fight fire with fire in politcal campaigns and do whatever it takes to see the other guy doesn't get elected? Isn't that contributing to make campaigns a sheeze hole?

...and this is exactly why politics have become such a sheeze hole.

Interesting article. It says the secretary walked in when the excuse was given she was tying his shoes. Later on, the story says the secretary still works at the capitol, but is afraid to say anything out of fear of being fired; yet the secretary was the one who filed the complaint with the Chairman of the Ethics Committee. It would appear to me she has no choice but to talk about if compelled to by the Ethics Committee. The story goes on stating Cagle announced in August 2009, he would not seek the Governor's office because of a back injury, yet states he ran in the 2010 Peachtree Road

There you go making an ass out of yourself assuming I'm voting for Braddock. I've been saying all along I that I'm not voting for her or Avery. I've been saying all along that I don't care for either Barnes or Deal. I have said I'm very seriously considering voting for the Libertarian. I've been complaining a lot how pathetic political campaigns have become with their focuses not being on the issues the voters find to be most important. Instead, it appears they would rather stay away from the issues and participate in character assination instead. Perhaps they're too damned stupid to thi

You friggin' hypocrite. You been trashing Braddock's integrity as if integrity is a key quality you demand in anyone running for public office. Now you turn around and state you don't care if Barnes (who you claim to support) lies and misrepresents the truth. Holy crap! You obviously don't really care that Barnes lacks integrity. Yep, you're definitely a hypocrite.

Then you have to agree that Barne's ad on this issue is wrong and misrepresenting the truth.

If anyone bases a decision to vote for a candidate soley because the other candidate didn't "reserve" their name as a url, is a moron.

Yes they have.

For those of you who couldn't find the "Women Against Deal" FB site, here it is. I was reading through some of the comments and noticed there were quite a bit of guys posting on there, so not all 25K who linked up to the site are women. I also observed that from what many were posting, they were not really informed on the mentioned legislation that allows the accused to face his accuser, which it was brought up before Barnes had also supported. They are mostly basing their information on the Barnes ad attacking Deal on this. I firmly believe anyone who is accused of a crime by another s

Some plumber has used my name for his site.

I thought so too, especially the ones taken for the DV.

Show me where he's expressed a solution that was actually his.

Like you vote for the person who has the D beside their name?

I don't like Deal and I don't like Barnes. The Libertarian candidate may just get my vote. How's Obama's hope and change working out for ya?

No kidding. The more I read here the more I'm inclined to change my mind about voting a write-in and vote for Braddock instead. Avery's supporters here are just plain and simple jerks.

They said a lot of the teachers they work with aren't voting for Barnes either. Do you think they are all Republicans as well?

Please provide the sources of your information, to include how, when and where she acknowledged her mailers.

I have three teachers who live on my street. All three of them said they were not going to vote for Barnes and said most of the teachers they work with weren't going to vote for Barnes either. They remember well the last time he was the Gov.