LPPT

I just spewed all over the keyboard, that is the funniest typo I have ever seen :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Price of the banquet?

I eat at Baby Janes a few times a month. Most of the people there are older, like me they enjoy having home cooked vegetables like turnips, collard greens, butter beans, carrots ect. You don't see kids in their a lot and it is generally clean. I am not a germa phobe so I enjoy getting to see the food before I eat it rather than the surprise hard and barely warm broccoli as a side. DH on the other hand hates buffets, give him the meat and plate of fries entree any day.

The law sets a precedence, where as they have legally been able to act against terrorist based on wire taps and internet information, they are now able to act on anything they perceive as illegal, they have routed around the usual legal procedures by handing the evidence to the victim and allowing the victim to bring charges against perpetrator. I wonder if they will be handing over nude pictures of children to the parents to bring charges against pedophiles. At least this is how I understand the law to work. I think it works the same on all sites, say you use a site like p.com to plan a

I respect your opinion on the bill, my opinion is about watching a door cracked with many of the laws that supposedly protect us from terrorism are now being thrown wide open, the premise that technology can now be used to eradicate criminal behavior to create a better society sounds very good on the surface. Law is what creates a criminal and that is where I find this very scary, and that is why I indulge in scenarios. Just as many have over the health care bill, they picture death squads. We can discuss the healthcare bill in another topic if you want to. My concern is with this bill,

As far as I know what you have described is illegal search and seizure, as of now they can not do that. The premise of this is that it harms companies through theft. so lets think about loss to a company through left. People that slack on the job are technically stealing money from the company. If you do some research on a company and find it's practices while not illegal would certainly cause public outcry. Publishing this and having it go viral on the internet can be considered stealing or negatively effecting the companies bottom line. Again the pink slime company comes to mind what t

I want to make sure I have this right, this is the first law that will allow them to take legal action against people other than terrorist based on the information they are gathering over the internet. Think about any information that is gathered by a computer, not just what you type but other things that are gathered and sent over the internet. Your car passing through an intersection. Your cell phone, your purchases, the on star in your car. They want to suck down all the information from satellites. We want to think they are not interested in us, they want the big fish, the corpora

Cosmetic surgeons motto is>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you got the money honey,, I got the time

Hopefully it pays off for her making appearances at malls and toy stores. It just seems really radical.

Did you spend as much as her getting that way? Reminds me of Micheal Jackson's obsession with wanting to look like Dianna Ross. I wonder if this gal had ribs removed? it looks like it.

SEE MORE PICS AND THE STORY HERE Look At What You've Done To Yourself!: Ukranain Girl Fulfills Dream Of Becoming Real Life Barbie Dol l

The issue is they are accomplishing this goal by passing a law that says they can basically spy on us. Collect our private information off of the internet and do whatever they please with it. They have already passed a law allowing them to listen to our phone conversations and arrest us based on that information. As of now the Government can not legally open my mail nor can they legally open my email. If they obtain information illegally they can not act against me. They are seeking to legally obtain the information and act on it any way they please. This becomes a danger as I explained whe

It is very frightening to think about everything typed on a computer going into a Government data base with programs being written to extract certain information. This is at the bottom of it all. Big brother is watching!

I don't think that that will be an issue under universal healthcare. Think about why we don't want that information public, in most part it is because we fear losing coverage or having higher premiums based on our health problems. They are talking about Government access to every word typed on the internet. I think it is interesting that facebook supports, that screams of corporate interest. My understanding is the Gov. will be free to pass on any information collected to any entity requesting it.

Thanks for the link, the remarks demonstrate how broad this is and the many uses it has for limiting our freedom. It also opens the door to even more laws further restricting our internet freedom. As I mentioned in my scenario we are in danger of having blog sites shut down and those blogging in danger of being punished. While I agree that their are real issues here, I don't approve of such broad terms to address the issues.

Just so you know the scenario I described came from my own head in the multiple ways this law can evolve based on how broad it is. What you posted is what politicians claim they are passing it for. The part about child pornography is a red flag, just like terrorist,drug smugglers, criminals of all types. These are all red flags that say we are taking away your freedom to protect you against the bad guys. Your are free to believe that multinational corporations are not desperate to get control of internet information if you want to.

How about you prove it can't be used like that. You show me proof since you obviously know more about what can and can't be done with this law, you show me absolute proof that sites can not be considered a cyber threat to a corporation under this law. You show me that a company going bankrupt and closing it's doors because of published information can not be declared a threat to national economic security. This law as it is being passed in such broad terms absolutely allows for those scenarios. Don't play innocent because this is in the cafe. All folks have to do is turn on the political

Why don't you read up on the bill and and figure out all the things that can be done under the broad terms of it. I don't appreciate the your smartass remark about me and my boy, I don't have a boy. I open and read google news every day, I read the articles that interest me and sometimes post what I think will interest others in a discussion, You on the other hand have an agenda when ever you log onto the site. I don't appreciate your personal attack when people are discussing something that effects them. You know that your remarks are going to run off any and everybody on the site that w

They are purposely trying to pass this law in the broadest terms possible to fill in the blanks they want after it passes, And my statement is a very real possibility if this is passed as is.

I am not allowed to criticize the politicians that I voted for because they have a R in front of their names? I can only criticize democrats or I am disloyal to the party, in other words I have to play the game even when I know it is wrong. I get it now If republicans vote for it them I am supposed to blindly support it.

I really don't want to see this thread dissolve into partisan politics. This last year we have seen our legislatures cross the isle repeatedly when it came to limiting our constitutional freedoms. Party politics are nothing but smoke and mirrors to hide what is really going on. We have a group of politicians in Washington looking to limit our freedoms and in my opinion it is because the people are angry at their incompetence and they are scared to death of a rebellion.

CISPA is an amendment to the National Security Act of 1947, which does not currently contain provisions pertaining to cybercrime. It adds provisions to the Act describing cyber threat as a "vulnerability of, or threat to, a system or network of a government or private entity, including information pertaining to the protection of a system or network from either 'efforts to degrade, disrupt, or destroy such system or network'; or 'theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information.'"[11] In addition, CISPA requires the Di

Didn't Gingrey vote to allow companies to spam us with our cell phones claiming that the old law did not allow business that legitimate business with a person to call them on their cells

They are going to keep trying until they get one passed. They keep trying to pass the broadest one they can about what a threat is and to whom. My guess is that corporations are desperate for this to pass. The internet is now full of blogs where people congregate to share like views on thousands of subjects. For instance a site for parents to blog, you have thousands on their blogging about the harm a certain vaccine did to their child, the pharmaceutical company can have that site declared a cyber threat to their company and have it shut down.

Link to article WASHINGTON -- The plan was for the debate on the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act to take place on Thursday, with the vote the next day. As it turns out, the legislation came to a surprising vote after the debate tonight, eventually passing in the House by a vote of 248-168. CISPA passed with a series of additional amendments, many of which have been outlined previously, including one from Rep. Ben Quayle (R-Ariz.) bringing cybersecurity crimes, the threat of harm or death to an individual and protection against child pornography under t