NewsJunky

I voted NO on all 5. I studied them pretty carefully. I think everyone should think long and hard before voting to change the Constitution.

Speaking of sneaky, I noticed some nice big Avery signs on the road today. Nothing wrong with that but all of the Republican candidate signs, except Paulette's were missing. Big Avery signs were there in their place. I would call it coincidence except it was all over not just in one location. No mowing had been done either.

I would like to have seen some of the candidates speak (on p.com) after their stop in Paulding County. Pubby, you have given some of them great coverage over the years.

I have met Cagle a few times. I won't comment at all on him. I have spoken with Nathan Deal quite a few times in the past year. I liked him and I think he has been attacked with some of the most vicious, sleaziest, unfair campaign adds that I have ever seen. In some cases they don't even approach the truth. Even Jay Bookman has made a few comments about that. We know which side of the fence he stands on.

I was speaking to the attacks on Deal concerning the rape shield law and you know that. Those adds by Barnes are unfair and misinformed. The women who do not take the time to find out the truth about the charges are also misinformed. They are entitled to their opinions just as I am though. The numbers I was speaking of in my previous post were concerning the Women Against Deal who showed up in Buckhead to protest. I hope your friends in Dawsonville don't work for Deal and Cagle. I am sure they would like to know who those people are if they are that close to them. Especially since they

Didn't say you were. I was just speaking to what the Women FOR Deal are. I know a lot of them. I just think the the Women against Deal are sadly misinformed and mistaken in their view of him. I saw them on TV. Didn't look like there were very many. I will make a call and find out when I get around to it.

Maybe she just found out what the real story was on this issue. Here is another tidbit. Deal co sponsored a Bill labeled the Dunn Deal (Nathan Deal and Jennifer Dunn) it later evolved into what is now known as Megan's Law. MrsH is a voter who educates herself as to the issues and the candidates. Do you remember the clips of some of the Obama supporters talking about why they were voting for him? Wonder if that lady ever got her free car, gas for it, and her free house. Maybe she did!

I have a feeling that in any other election you would think this was a plus for a candidate!

I thought it would end that way. I saw it on the late news last night by the way. They interviewed a "Women for Deal" supporter. She spoke very well for herself and her group. They have taken the time to find the facts for themselves. Go Blue, I don't vote for someone because of a letter by their name. I vote for them when I think their platform best aligns with my beliefs.

Knew You would end up insulting me if I stayed in this thread.

Not Barnes supporters? Yeah right! Can't wait to see how many actually showed up.

Not sure anyone has named them yet. I guess you could call them the "Women Who are Holding A Vigil And Don't Know The Facts" Or maybe they are called "Women Against Deal" as the topic title suggests.

You can say this about Deal and not hold Roy accountable for helping to craft the Bill you find so heinous? The women who are protesting probably do not even know the truth about what they are protesting. They are being used by the Barnes campaign. · Roy Barnes served on the Georgia State Bar Evidence Committee during the time the Georgia rules of evidence were being reviewed and approved the very legislation that he is slamming Deal for supporting

You said it and you do get it. I just was not ready for what I knew would come from being politically incorrect. Missed you BTW.

Yep! Been hearing about it for a few days now. This Administration is going to stick it to the taxpayer every way they can. Just following the path that was traveled in the great depression by FDR.

She has talked all she plans to talk. I think the answer is NO unless the voters get a flier or two before election day. Just my opinion though.

This was Neal Bortz take on the Barnes adds and accusations. He hits the nail right on the head: Now what DOESN'T Barnes' ad tell you? Well ... let's see: · The U.S. Constitution guarantees to the accused the right to confront all witnesses against him. That means that an accused rapists' trial lawyer gets to ask testimony of the rape victim under oath. Roy Barnes is a trial lawyer. He knows this. · Barnes' ad is based on work by Nathan Deal to conform the rules of evidence in Georgia with the federal rules of evidence. This has been done in 42 of the 50

Barnes won't win! If he and Will do win you will certainly deserve to gloat a little. Not sure I could stomach much gloat though. I promise not to gloat too much when the Republicans sweep the state!

You really do need to improve your spelling skills. You know that is not the way to spell the future Governor's name! It is Deal!!!!

I agree with you on this one. I don't think changing the Constitution is a good idea as a rule. I voted no on all of the amendments.

I think you will be pleasantly surprised. He is going to win you know.

I don't know about that. How many Democrats are in Georgia?

They are being used to make Deal look bad. They aren't told that Roy helped draft the very Bill that they feel Deal should not have supported. Have a look at this: Lori Geary of WSB[/url] TV interviews a rape victim who is “disgusted” by the Roy's ad claiming Deal wanted to weaken the rape shield laws. Betty Beasley explains how Nathan Deal prosecuted the man who raped her when she was only 14 and defended her from attacks on her character. http://www.wsbtv.com/video/25456906/index.html

Somebody stole mine too!!!

They didn't just kill and eat their own this time. They showed their true colors where free speech is concerned. If he had stayed off Fox and only said what they wanted him to he would have been OK. I think in the end they have lost more money than Soros donated. I have always liked Williams too.