Eddie Bennett

Manufacturers who want sell his product, to you, has something going on that you may not want to get involved with. If it's for the reason that you only need one item, and the manufacturer only sells box car loads, than it might be safe to buy from the person breaking the load down. But, be careful. Some of the people doing the breaking down makes more money off you than the manufacturer of the product. That should be easy for you to figure out, if you are not stupid, or something. Don't pay more, of your hard earned money, to the middle man than you do to the person who made the prod

You certainly did the right thing, DR! I remember the dilemma you were facing a couple years back. I wasn't worried, because I knew you could handle it like a pro.

Are you using this expensive remedy for protecting your pet from heart worms? A former regulatory employee at Merial (maker of Heartguard Plus) says she was fired after refusing to destroy a document questioning the effectiveness of Heartgard Plus, a top-selling heartworm preventative. Kari Blaho-Owens, Ph.D., makes that claim and others in a lawsuit against Merial LLC, the animal drug division of Sanofi Aventis. The case was filed last month in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. http://news.vin.com/vinnews.aspx?articleId=18763

Buying and selling is better done between the the person who made the product, or is doing the service, and the person who is going to use the product, or get the service. Middle men are con artists. Why would you want to be conned while the person who made the product or did the service is the only necessity?

It seems to me that paying someone else to send someone else to do the work is a waste of money. The person who actually does the work is either stupid, is not doing the expert work you thought you were supposed to get, or part of the con against you. When you need to hire someone else to do something for you, and they send someone else to do the work, you are paying enough money to hire at least two people, if not more. In addition to that, if the person you originally hired doesn't even show up, on the job, it's a safe bet that they are the ones getting paid the most money out of your c

Sometimes it's better to hire someone else to do things we want done. We may be busy doing what we need to do, and simply don't have time to do it ourselves. But, there are many reasons we may want to hire someone else to do something. When we hire someone else to do something, and that person sends someone else to do the work, we have been scammed. If we pay enough money to get a job done by another person, and that person sends someone else to do the work; WTF? We have just paid someone else to do sit on his arse while we are to busy to do the work we want done.

TC is the needle, and the thread speaks for itself (res ipsa loquitur.

Kangaroo courts don't like having the public to know the real issues of a trial. A good watch dog group can stop Kangaroos from their legal shams. I am on the side of the watchdog group as Kangaroo's seem to be held more accountable. My power bill has shown some improvement sense the watchdogs's started watching.

Front page: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, (ajc Truth-O-Meter) "Workers who pick produce in Georgia's fields can make $12 to $18 an hour."

You might be a conservative if you suggest to a homeless man with no shoes, "pull yourself up by his boot straps!" :lol: :lol:

A conservative, his mother, a ten year old kid, and Santa Claus are walking down the street. They see a $100 dollar bill lying on the ground. Who gets it? Answer: The conservative. Santa Claus doesn't exist, so he doesn't have a chance. And the conservative, seeing an opportunity to get his hands on $100, punches the ten year old in the face and pushes his mother in front of a speeding car. By default, the conservative is the only one left, so he gets the money.

I don't see it like you do, H~h~S!

Who am I to disagree? I am what I am. Why should I try to resist the classifications assigned me? If I spend my time trying to convince people I can spell, when I know I can't spell s***, more negativity would be created. If I've heard that I can't spell a thousand times it doesn't bother me any more than it did the first time I I heard that I can't spell, and it didn't bother me the first time I heard it. If I should allow that classification cause me any discomfort, at an emotional level, it might be painful. But, sense I don't like negative emotional feelings, I just refrain

If these are not reasonable questions to ask fellow Americans; what would it take to make these questions more reasonable to ask? Is asking for your opinion as to what percentile you classify yourself in just too much to ask, and an unreasonable question?

Sense 50% to 90% of the people, in this country, have only 9.3% of the wealth; where do you think you will be on the percentile category in 10 years?

I don't figure you to be one of the bottom 50% of people, in this country, who have only 1/2% of the wealth. I am supposing you to be one of the 50% to 90% of the people, in this country, who have 9.3% of the wealth. 1. Do you blame 10% of the people, in this country, for your lack of wealth. 2. Do you blame yourself for not being as wealthy as the top 10%. 3. What do you think of the 50% of the people, in this country, who have only 1/2% of the wealth? 4. Do you think those 50% of the people, in this country, who have only 1/2% of the wealth should go somewhere else to live, o

I think we are agreeing, a little, here! I just hope you are not taking what I said personally. My tread is trashed, not me, when someone succeeds in getting it moved to the political forum. With that said, I don't feel personally attacked in that regard. Thanks, NE#11

It is also not a political issue, NE#1! People who try to make it politics don't give a rats arse about the reality of their own input to this society. A menace to society naturally tries to lay the blame on politics. But, society's strength naturally comes from the talented people of America.

It seems that the responses I get are certainly not from any amount of representation for 90% of the people in this country, which makes it NOT a political issue at all. It fact is may be a representation of special interest. I would support the reasoning that 10% vs. 90% would be narrowing the representation down to a special interest. 10 % vs. 90% definitely makes the 10% a special interest group.

I am talking about percentages of talent, in America. I only respond to people who turn it into something political. I actually don't appreciate anything I post going to the political forum. That is allowing someone else to make my choices for me, just like 90% of us do. Anyone responding politically to my talent thread is trying to have my thread moves to another forum, on purpose.

If it's Democrats that are doing things to create such a pie chart, markdavd, the SOB's need to move to China. I don't care who they are, the SOB's, are not worthy of being American's if they do their fellow citizens such a way.

What's sickening, PSD, are talented Americans voting against their own prosperity while making 1% to 10% of the rest of us a damn good living.

Why would 90% of us, who are very talented Americans, vote for a government representation that creates such a pie chart for us to live by? It seems to me that the 1% to 10%, of us, who are smarter than the other 90%, of us, are indeed not very patriotic.

The worst bad choices, 90% of us have maid, has to do with the thinking that these 10%, of talented Americans, work as hard as we do. If you call working your mind the kind of work do, 90% of talented Americans, you are right. The 10% works their mind and the minds of the other 90% as well. The, SOB's are smarter than the other 90% of us. That is not working very good for this country. It seems to be working better for China. China also has about 1% to 10% of it's own people working along with about 1% to 10% of the American people. That does not work well for 90% of the Chinese, nor