so according to this (When the presumed physical evidence came back and the decision to issue a warrant was made) so they did find evidence that she was sexual abused? correct? someone needs to explain this to me, becasue I must be confused about this issue,
I have to be reading this wrong, The step dad evidently molested the little girl, she told the school, they investigated it, and did not rely on her say so alone, the physical evidence came back that she was sexual molested, and the mother left with the step dad and they took the little girl? and they also have a 1 year old little