Jump to content
Paulding.com

ITMFA

Members
  • Content Count

    9,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by ITMFA

  1. Yeah, not only is she an expert at being uninformed and opinionated, she doesn't even realize it.
  2. Only people that celebrate treason are born under a rock. I've never committed treason and I've never celebrated it.
  3. Never realized there was a memorial day in honor of treason.
  4. I hear tell you were in the room giving advice to Lee Atwater when he drew up the first designs for the beta version of dog whistle 2.0.
  5. They should be happy they weren't *shot*. It's not as if the police would enhance the report or shoot unarmed black men.
  6. If anyone is childish it is Glassjaw but you conveniently overlook his antics because he sides with you politically. Weren't you the one that said CC is too serious all of the time? Well which on is it? Too serious or childish for having fun?
  7. :rofl: Translation: "I know you are, but what am I?"
  8. Bingo About the same as yours so I depend on the independent professionals for my information while you depend on gov't propaganda.
  9. No because the building stood just like Bldg 7 should have stood. None of the WTC buildings should have collapsed in their own footprint. Instead all of them did. The odds are incredible that 3 skyscrapers would collapse into their own footprint within hours of each other on the same day. Never happened before or since.
  10. [sarcasm] Oh well, a few kids being shoot is an acceptable loss. Let's not try and make it zero. [/sarcasm] When I went t school we hid under our desks for bomb raid drills not school massacres.
  11. Says the climate change denier... :rofl:
  12. You're reaching. Steel that loses structural integrity doesn't collapse in on itself, into its own foot print for 3 separate buildings in one day. Remembering that such an event has never happened before or since though there have been worse fires in other high rise buildings. And your hurried asbestos bit falls short too. Bldg 7 was completed years after the other two in the mid 1970s. You are assuming that the steel reached a forging temperature for 3 buildings on all four corners of the building at the same time making it possible for the building to not fall over but collapse in it
  13. Letting them continue unchecked is a mistake and only serves to allow their message to grow. Is that your objective? Many people agree with them in secrecy and do nothing to oppose them. This way they cannot be called out for covert support of their activities.
  14. Y'all keep saying this but not one of you can come up with a single post where this has occurred. If you keep repeating something over and over again, it doesn't make it true. Especially, when you have yet to produce any proof with an abundance of posts to choose from.
  15. Did you just reference Wiki concerning 9/11? Well I guess that is a step up from the propaganda you normally provide from NIST Losing credibility with you is always a good thing. You're about as credible as a monkey that receives tree climbing advice from a fish.
  16. COWA still is a 9/11 Truther. On that day, 3 buildings collapsed into their own footprint. One of the buildings was not struck by a plane. That has never happened before or since. Jet fuel cannot melt steel beams. You, I and PanAmVet or whatever his last screenname was already debated this and in over a decade, more has come out to support my position than yours.
  17. It makes some difference to you because y'all keep bringing it up. But just like everything else you post, you've got nothing. Since you all have nothing, I've entertained your nonsense long enough but I do want you to know that... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTB1h18bHlY
  18. Translation: As usual, we on the right have NOTHING but baseless conspiracy theories. If we had anything our arrogant asses would nail Pubby, COWA, and whoever else we accuse of being COWA, with definitive proof. But we got nothing, nada, zilch.
  19. Put up or shut up. Your credibility will be tanked along with Foxmeister's. Making unsupported accusations seems a bit like libel to me.
  20. I'm not certain who the hooker is, TP. I think it is clear who the money launderer is.
  21. What's the purpose of him lying about knowing who I am. He doesn't have to post it, he could PM it to me. I'm interested in knowing who he thinks I am because I know for a fact he doesn't know who I am. But I do know who Guard Dad is. For someone so worried about who others are, why does Foxmeister hide his identity?
  22. Well pee on my leg and call it rain! There actually is a tape.
  23. You know who I am? Post a link to the comment. Post my name or PM either to me. You have my permission if you actually know who I am. Speaking of hypocrites, why are you worried about who I am when you refuse to say who you are? You called me an "ass" and Glassjaw called me "COWA-rd". Being the hypocrite you are, you deny starting the hostilities. BOY, I SAY, BOY, WHO'S YOUR DADDY?
  24. Here ya go with the circular responses trying to get the thread closed. I gave my position and then I asked you to clarify yours. You refuse to do it. Face it Foxmeister. In this thread, I OWN YOU. So consider yourself OWNED.
×
×
  • Create New...