Jump to content
Paulding.com

Cabe

Members
  • Content Count

    25,310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Cabe

  1. You don't think the county has a right to verify the use of the funds provided?

     

    The audit has been asked for many times over the years. Provide it or no more subsidy. It is as simple as that. The county taxpayer has probably given at least 2 million dollars to this private firm over the years with no accountability.

     

     

     

    If there is no contract in place then why would any payments be due? The way I undestood the comments is that the previous contact expired over the summer.

     

    I didn't make any comment about verifying funds, so I don't know if this is directed at my comments. however, I was simply pointing out that the same level of service has apparently been offered the county almost 4 months after a contract had expired. I don't know why the contract wasn't in place. But it would appear that the county had actually put Sam in a bad place because of this. Did the county contract require any accountability? It's paying for a service. The service has been there. My guess is that an audit would show that the county needs to provide more funding than it's current level.

  2. Though you'd like to believe that (and it may be true with some people, heck I don't know) this instance has nothing to do with favoritism. I noticed a URL of a non-commerce member in the title of a thread so I changed the title. I did not have time to go through the entire forum and did not see that there was another thread. I'll go look now.

     

    thank you Gomer. It wasn't personal. Don't know where you've been hiding, but this has all been discussed ad nauseum in the last few days.

  3. And it's not Paulette's web site.........so why does the title suggest otherwise. Just like my thread wasn't Will's web site. :wacko:

     

    Tsk, tsk, tsk, the site's favoritism is showing again. Things like this really take away the credibility of anything posted here.

     

    Exactly! I see only one of the title's was edited. And they wonder why some won't come here. I'd say it's painfully obvious.

  4. If you are arrested, and not guilty, do you except a punishment for the fun of it or do you use your "millionaire next door" bank roll and fight the false charges?

     

    or....if you are arrested for domestic violence do you just get your attorney to draw up a condition of divorce being that the charges are dropped....of course no husband is going to say, no press charges but lets stay married compared to getting rid of your pschyo self.

     

    I'm disappointed, both you and Medea usually have more common sense then this.

     

    Thank you. (I think.) However, you are assuming facts that aren't in evidence. Your interpretation of the domestic violence situation is off base.

  5. She was arrested, not convicted of any crime!! When is everyone going to put the right information on here??

     

    Never. They aren't content to present the information and allow people to form an opinion. (We obviously aren't intelligent enough to do that on our own.) They would much rather twist and turn it.

  6. Geez Cobb, you are a regular Sherlock Holmes. Reckon that might be because he is a DEMOCRAT? :wacko:

     

    If you'll look closed you will find a picture of a guy wearing an Avery T-shirt too. I know, I know. That something you would expect to see on the Republicans website, huh. :huh:

     

    Gee, feelip. Now maybe you get what some of us have said about the associations you continually try to make to Richardson, Shearin, et al.

  7. Sorry to throw TRUTH into the discussion.

     

    No, you started a new discussion. rolleyes.gif And of all of your few posts on p.com, you have posted with only one theme. I was just pointing out that your agenda was showing. And while you may have an alternate ID here, those who come here new with one topic of posting rarely gain credibility. drinks.gif Look around. There's other fun stuff to discuss.

  8. Trying to figure out what is worse in Georgia....

     

    The idiots running for office or the idiots that support them without looking at facts and history but because of a letter by the name on the ballot.

     

    ....right now it's a toss up.

     

    Wow. Very insightful. That really added to the conversation. /s/

     

    We face choices similar to what we had in November 2008. The assumption that it's the "R" and "D" is becoming asinine. Can't you simply entertain the idea that folks choose the candidate whose voting record is most in line with what they would want?

    • Like 1
  9. Is Paulette Braddock ever going to speak to us voters of Paulding County? I know her opponent Will Avery has been at forums, debates (where she wouldn't show up), speeches, yada yada yada. But there hasn't been anything out of Paulette. All I know about her is she has catch phrases on her website, she has an arrest record and she has some signs around.

     

    When is she going to be accessible? Surely she isn't assuming that we Paulding County voters are just going to vote for her just because of the letter after her name? We have higher standards than that.

    This place has attracted an echo. rofl.gif

     

    For starters, Paulette has acknowledged printing and mailing $20,000+ in non-reported mailers during July and August. She claimed she did not know she had to report them if her company printed them. There is a pending Ethics Commission Investigation. And that is WAY over the maximum allowed even as in kind contributions.

     

    But the one that still baffles me, is her total lack of contributions reported from July 1 through August 17th, even with a 4th of July weekend BBQ fundraiser where she did show the expenses, but $0.00 contributions collected.

    There is not a limit on in-kind contributions from yourself to yourself.

×
×
  • Create New...