Wineguy

Ok, this thread is no longer about politics or proof of anything. This has turned into flat out name calling and mud slinging.

I apologize sir, but I do not know you and I am surely not your Pal. I refer to the documentation that the United States Government provides showing what has been claimed against our representative. If you cannot elaborate on further details than I have no choice but to assume what I have is all that there is. Listen, I am only human and will admit that if you can provide documentation that shows that she has paid or setup payments for the State and local taxes due, and has cleared herself out of the contempt of court, then I will ask for this thread to be closed and not push this any f

Make that 3

I am curious as to which thread this is. This I believe is the first I have heard of any lack of credibility as I have held all of the documentation in my hand.

As much as I would like that, I do not think he should under the fairness of being a public forum and to show no bias towards a candidate, I can see why it would not be.

Ok Guys, I think we let have left topic. I want to encourage any who have not to please go to the original post and reach out to Mr. Kemp and let him know your thoughts on Paulette being able to run for office and hold office. Thanks,

I respect your opinion and you have every right to endorse your candidate as I do mine. If you feel there is something that needs to be said it is your right as well as mine to be sure it is known. I apologize that you do not like the style that the website was created in. But I do not think this is the correct forum to address your concerns about that. I know as much as you do about the origins of the mentioned site, and I share your disgust in its design. However, as Craigslist has demonstrated, a very simply laid out site is many times very effective in getting information to the end u

I will respond as I am the originator. I have never once spoken a word to support anyone that is known to have outstanding taxes or be outside of the law. As such I also want to say that on a personal level I have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING against Rep. Braddock. I have never spoken a word to her, and her voting record does not completely go against mine. My issue and reason for this campaign and the devotion of my time has been in the hopes to educate the citizens prior to the election as well as to ensure that my fellow constituents do not unknowingly re-elect an official that is constitutionall

Wow. The senate race is going to be brutal.

They tried that, it caused the highest organized crime system in history. Good luck.

I would repeal the stupid prohibition laws that still dictate the industry and restrict consumers.

Great interview. I want to thank you for getting the answer about Sunday Sales. I like hearing him say he will vote to have it on the ballot for November.

I'm at taki right now but I cannot wait to see it when I get home.

Absolutely it would. You just have to be a concerned citizen.

Guys and Gals, I have come into knowledge that the Secretary of State has, against his judgement, had to let the verdict in my case against Rep. Braddock stand due the law written as it is. However, there is still opportunity. I have also heard that if enough citizens file a complaint with him expressing the views that we are appalled at the situation, he will be forced to take action. I am going to appeal the ruling and plead my case yet again. I need all of my fellow P.Com D19 constituents to help me by emailing Mr. Kemp and let him know how appalled we are that someone with these

I agree. The law states that if the law only allows for Beer and Wine which is how we operate in the unincorporated PC, then the Sunday law will mirror the license. So Sunday sales will only allow them to sell what they are already selling. I just do not understand how the State Government can let us vote, 95% of other Georgians get to vote, but Paulding and Douglas get to act against the voters.

GRRRRRRRR!!!!!!! :(

:clapping:

I have to admit at first I was unsure of some of your posts and the point of where they were going. But I now look forward to the insight you proved. It is kind of like picking up the newspaper and going to the opinion section every day to see how you can expand your views. lol

What about former business property that has become an eyesore? Most developers and retail properties can afford it. And most bank owned properties can be forced to clean up with a order to the bank who owns the property if it is in that bad of shape. That is what the news always portrays anyway.

I like The Postman for having such an awesome list of people he likes. lol

I second this. I believe that eyesores are a major detractor from bringing in new residence and business. No one wants to live around eyesores and trash. I had thought a similar question about what his thoughts were on holding building owners accountable for empty buildings that go into disrepair or remain empty. Is it possible to issue tax relief or go easier on permits if a business chooses to go into an existing location instead of building next to a vacant eyesore. This would promote filling vacant buildings, and not leave use looking like a half empty ghost town over time.