Jump to content
Paulding.com

Guard dad

Members
  • Content Count

    19,047
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    401

Everything posted by Guard dad

  1. Once again you demonstrate that your politics matter more to you than the truth. A variety of sources below: http://fortune.com/2017/03/15/donald-trump-2005-tax-returns/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/may/24/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-claim-about-donald-trump-paying-no/ http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-14/msnbcs-non-story-trump-made-150-million-paid-25-effective-tax-rate http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-taxes-rachel-maddow-236066
  2. I heard him say that. He's like a bull in a china shop when he speaks, but I think the point he was trying to make was that things could have been much worse. A lot of anti-Trump people go out of their way to hear what they want to hear in his words. Things would be much better if we'd drop the hate and just try to work together to help these people.
  3. Thank you! This is how it should be...put politics aside and take care of people in need.
  4. Why thank you!! Even though I'm fully aware that my buddy EZ and I are not idiots, we appreciate being told that now and then.
  5. Well hell, even you could probably win an election in an area where Cain, RM, TP, COWA, and TBAR (and all his alter egos) lived.
  6. The point was that a person doesn't attain such accomplishments by being an idiot. But you're free to continue to hate. I didn't mention sex. Your understanding of investments is extremely poor, and you failed to factor in all the people, including his children, who have become very wealthy in his wake. Then you make such a ridiculous statement and dare to lecture me on truth and reality?
  7. Repeatedly calling someone who is super rich and has built a conglomerate of over 500 companies, is married to a gorgeous woman half his age, and became POTUS with no prior political experience an idiot doesn't say much for your own intellect.
  8. Quoting Robert Reich says plenty about you. And not good things. This country needs some "off the rails". Both parties are corrupt and they serve a master or masters who is not the American people. Trump identified a lot of the areas where the American people have had enough, and that's part of what put him in office. Just wish he'd learn some tact and poise.
  9. The parties being screwed up is not because of Trump; Trump is because of the parties being screwed up. That's why we were left with a choice of Hillary and Trump.
  10. ^^This^^ The GOP establishment is pretty much as rotten as the Democrats are. They have all failed us.
  11. Translation: Before the Democrats told you to hate him. All of us without hate in our hearts saw the transformation.
  12. Guess you need a reminder http://paulding.com/forum/topic/317905-trump-declared-winner-in-south-carolina/?p=4001227
  13. Translation: "I don't understand the concept of anyone thinking for themselves and not being a part of one of the two collectives. So since GD isn't a member of the party that tells me what to think, he must be a member of the other party who tells people what to think".
  14. I think we have all acknowledged that the guy is an a-hole. Funny how this thread has gone from Trump not responding to the tragedy (which we have proved untrue), to him being a jerk. Duh, we all know he's a loudmouth ass.
  15. Let me be clear, and I'm surprised that I have to remind you of this: I am NOT a Trump supporter. Surely, you saw some of my posts during teh primary where I was blasting him. Our mutual friend who likes teenage boy's who dress like girls (LOL) can verify that. But he is president and he won fair and square. And I believe all of us should be open minded and wish him success. If he succeeds, we all do, and if he fails, we all fail. I can only recall maybe one issue I have expressed I have expressed support for Trump about. The rest of my comments about hims have merely been defending him fr
  16. You would be much more credible if you'd spend less time telling everyone what they are really thinking. I actually have a great respect for genuine liberals. Not partisans, but real liberals who are driven by genuine love and compassion for their fellow man. Their shortfall is that they often often think only with their hearts and not enough with their heads, which often makes their well-intended solutions problematic. The best example of that is Socialism. It's a grand and well intended concept from the heart, but it fails when real-life consequences are introduced. Most Democratic p
  17. There you go....still blaming those of us who disagree with you on party allegiance, when that isn't the case. I'm pretty sure you've read enough of me on Facebook and The Hwy to know that I'm extremely put out with the GOP as well. I could link to one of my posts on The Hwy, but I don't think that's appreciated here. But you know where to look if interested. I agree that disapproving of what a president does not necessarily equal hate. But dedicating a large chink of one's like to bashing and discrediting him, and actively searching out negative "news" articles just to support your fore
  18. He did no such thing! Clearly, you have to lie to justify your hated for the man. Transcripts from the governor of Puerto Rico (D) on Cavuto just yesterday. http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2017/09/28/puerto-rico-governor-on-federal-aid-trumps-upcoming-visit.html There you have the truth, right out of the Democratic governor's mouth. He's trying to do what's right for his people instead of playing partisan politics. I hope some of you feel like fools, because you should. The leftist media and propaganda sites threw a bunch of lies at you to try and discredit Trump, and t
  19. What we have here is a concerted effort to make this Trump's "Katrina". And the sheeple are buying it.
  20. She was a government employee. And it wasn't her politics, it was her personal morals. Try again
  21. The left is floating that claim too. Same as "Bush hates black people" after Katrina.
  22. Of course you don't. Facts don't compute with you.
  23. You endorsed Cain's link and claimed it was not fake news, when it clearly was. The whole site is fake news. The first link I posted was to National Review. While it is certainly right leaning when it comes to their opinion pieces, they are a legitimate source. The article also contained links to original sources, including the NBC affiliate which I also linked to. So the actual data my links referenced were solid and factual. Not fake news. That's the difference between my links and Cain's, but you would have had to actually read it to know. I did read Cain's link and looked at the site a
×
×
  • Create New...