Jump to content
Paulding.com

Recommended Posts

Know that the majority of the people in the United States of America trust that ex-lax aided fart more than they do the liar in chief.

You do know that when the out-of-office corrupt Ukrainian Prosecutor demanded that the US Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch be moved - This is before the new Ukrainian President was elected on an anti-corruption pledge - because she would punish Ukraine if the corrupt old regime tried to frame Biden was #OURcurrentPRESIDENT taking a bribe.  That the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor couldn't deliver on the goods because of his ouster by the new guy just meant that #OURcurrentPRESIDENT didn't get what his payoff. 

What is really funny though is this "opinion piece' on FOX NEWS.

Here's an excerpt:

Quote

Andrewnapolitano.JPG

The issue right now is witnesses and documents. What has been suggested is that #OURcurrentPRESIDENT ordered McConnell to 'wrap this up' before the super bowl because he will be being interviewed on that occasion followed a day or two later by the State of the Union which is where he wants to say he is exonerated. .

What you have to know is a 53-47 acquittal will not end this anymore than O.J.'s acquittal of murder was the end of that sordid story.

I don't know anyone who can unsee a high crime of this magnitude.

PS: If you don't see a high crime in Trumps' self-serving effort to cheat to win the 2020 election, which goes back to the decision to let a corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor to have an effective US Ambassador with a reputation for exposing corruption in places like Ukraine get his wish - that she be removed; which happened in May, 2019.

 

PS: I have a feeling that there are many, many more 'illegal' quid pro quo's that will ultimately come out regarding the outrageous corruption of this administration. And it is not a joke!

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My hope is the Senate will drag this out for a couple of months and keep the three Senate candidates for President on their butts in the Senate in case a vote is called instead of on the campaign trail.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/24/2020 at 1:49 PM, The Sound Guy said:

My hope is the Senate will drag this out for a couple of months and keep the three Senate candidates for President on their butts in the Senate in case a vote is called instead of on the campaign trail.   

Fat chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gpatt0n said:

Fat chance.

I didn't think it possible for the Dems to look like bigger fools than they already have, but they are doing just that.

 

The beating they will get in the election will be epic.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Guard dad said:

I didn't think it possible for the Dems to look like bigger fools than they already have, but they are doing just that.

 

The beating they will get in the election will be epic.

I was talking to my wife earlier about Bernie while we were watching the view.  Megan McCain started hyping Bernie - I'm thinking he's the GOP chosen candidate now that the slander plan for Joe Biden has been exposed - and said she thinks people like him because he's the inverse of #OURcurrentPRESIDENT. 

I replied, "Yea, he's the Joe Stalin to Donald #OURcurrentPRESIDENT's Hitler imitation"

Kind of apt, actually.

PS: I'm not sure I like this hashtag thingy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know y'all will call me stupid, and I dont care, but I am still trying to see where the "high crimes and misdemeanors" are as well as the quid-pro-quo

 

I dont see it....or maybe I dont get it. 😕

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mach4 said:

I know y'all will call me stupid, and I dont care, but I am still trying to see where the "high crimes and misdemeanors" are as well as the quid-pro-quo

 

I dont see it....or maybe I dont get it. 😕

First, it has been illegal from as long as I've been alive for a candidate to accept aid from a foreign entity - person, state, company, etc. ... period.

That is what was so disturbing about the 2016  election ... Putin heaped massive aid on #OURcurrentPRESIDENT presumably independent of the campaign and #OURcurrentPRESIDENT as Mueller could document no specific conspiracy.

I was about six paragraphs into a long explanation when I realized that it is a complex case, like most important cases; and your broad question on which there have been books written.

Let it suffice to say that inviting foreigners into your campaign (remember the interview with Stephanopolus where the "Don" said he'd take dirt from any foreigner and might tell the FBI?) it is kind of like when your daddy said if you're out running around after midnight, you're automatically in trouble. 

Bottom line, #OURcurrentPRESIDENT cheats to win and I don't want him anywhere around government. In my opinion his efforts at cheating have lost him the privilege.
 

 

Okay, here he is with 391 million dollars of military aid that has gone through all the checks and investigations that bad-ass woman ambassador made them before she was fired and it is, as the GAO (Government Accountability Office) says, illegal to withhold them. (There is an actual law, passed back in the 1970s that makes it illegal for the president to withhold funds properly appropriated by congress.  Seems some of the stuff that didn't come out about Nixon was that he would twist congressmen and senators' arms by threatening to withhold funds from their districts.  It is also what would make it illegal for any president to withhold social security to all people in Minnesota or Georgia because he was pissed at a senator or congressman and go on TV and say, vote against David Perdue and I'll pay your social security.... which I'm afraid may be the next thing this not all of #OURcurrentPRESIDENT (tr ump) might do cause 'he can do what ever he wants' _)

Anyway - I know this is getting long -  the general understanding (Ask Judge Napolitano) is he got caught trying to cheat on the 2020 election.

Think of this as a high-stakes card game and #OURcurrentPRESIDENT is the dealer and we catch him dealing off the bottom of the deck.

Are we to say, Oh, you're our current president and you can lie (16,000 times and counting), cheat (the Ukrainian scandal) and steal (violation of the emoluments clause etc.) the coming election and will cheer when you get 96 percent of the vote giving you bragging rights over  your bud Vlad!

And our reaction is supposed to be "Oh wonderful, you deal off the bottom so well we will make you 'dealer for life' and let Don jr. take your place when that horrible day comes and you're no longer with us?

Personally, I think the patriotic thing - and my family has roots that go back to those days of the original revolution - is to say, "We don't need no trucking King with his gold plated pisser."

Bottom line, #OURcurrentPRESIDENT cheats to win and I don't want him anywhere around government. In my opinion his efforts at cheating have lost him the privilege.
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So... if the aid was outside of the campaign and the President himself didn't know about it, how exactly is he supposed to refuse this aid? 

 

Should #EXPRESIDENToftheUnitedStates have been impeached for providing funds to help oust Netanyahu even if the state department didn't know that was what was happening? 

Edited by The Sound Guy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Sound Guy said:

So... if the aid was outside of the campaign and the President himself didn't know about it, how exactly is he supposed to refuse this aid? 

 

Should #EXPRESIDENToftheUnitedStates have been impeached for providing funds to help oust Netanyahu even if the state department didn't know that was what was happening? 

That's easy SG:

He could have NOT SAID,  "Russia, if you're listening, there are 30,000 emails out there on Hillary's server you ought to go hack,"  ... or not say that next week you expect to have real dirt to spew about Hillary (this is the weekend after the meeting with Don Jr. at #OURcurrentPRESIDENT Tower}

But the real point is that is going back over the Mueller Report.

Oh, and we're not supposed to know that the effort to get an announcement of an investigation into the so-called alternate fact that Ukraine, not Russia, was responsible for the 2016 interference (Apparently that 400 lb hacker turned from pixie to Ukrainian at the direction of the Russian spy service who was really doing the work for the now out-of-office Ukrainian president who was a secret lover of Hillary.)

Your question about Netanyahu is more difficult. First I'm unaware of anything anyone in the current administration did to harm his re-election; quite the contrary, He whose name is replaced with a hashtag (Maybe we should call him Lord Voldemort ) instead did a lot of provocative things in favor of Netanyahu like moving the embassy to Jerusalem and endorsing the land grab in the Golan Heights (Until Lord Voldemort took office we stood against the use of military force to expand national borders as a matter of principle but not anymore.  This SEA CHANGE THAT PROMISES MORE WAR will eventually be used by Lord Voldemort to let Putin overrun Ukraine and probably some other countries like Latvia, Estonia and Belarus which you have to know Vlad wants badly and #OURcurrentPRESIDENT, I mean Lord Voldemort, wants to give him in exchange for a personal favor. 

I heard a news report that Bolton's new book will also spill the beans on how Lord Voldemort is passing around favors to folks like Erdogan, MBS and some other dictators. Aren't you so proud of him since I know you don't care what kind of perks he acquires acting as our ... Lord ...

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, gpatt0n said:

First, it has been illegal from as long as I've been alive for a candidate to accept aid from a foreign entity - person, state, company, etc. ... period.

That is what was so disturbing about the 2016  election ... Putin heaped massive aid on #OURcurrentPRESIDENT presumably independent of the campaign and #OURcurrentPRESIDENT as Mueller could document no specific conspiracy.

I was about six paragraphs into a long explanation when I realized that it is a complex case, like most important cases; and your broad question on which there have been books written.

Let it suffice to say that inviting foreigners into your campaign (remember the interview with Stephanopolus where the "Don" said he'd take dirt from any foreigner and might tell the FBI?) it is kind of like when your daddy said if you're out running around after midnight, you're automatically in trouble. 

Bottom line, #OURcurrentPRESIDENT cheats to win and I don't want him anywhere around government. In my opinion his efforts at cheating have lost him the privilege.
 

  Reveal hidden contents

Okay, here he is with 391 million dollars of military aid that has gone through all the checks and investigations that bad-ass woman ambassador made them before she was fired and it is, as the GAO (Government Accountability Office) says, illegal to withhold them. (There is an actual law, passed back in the 1970s that makes it illegal for the president to withhold funds properly appropriated by congress.  Seems some of the stuff that didn't come out about Nixon was that he would twist congressmen and senators' arms by threatening to withhold funds from their districts.  It is also what would make it illegal for any president to withhold social security to all people in Minnesota or Georgia because he was pissed at a senator or congressman and go on TV and say, vote against David Perdue and I'll pay your social security.... which I'm afraid may be the next thing this not all of #OURcurrentPRESIDENT (tr ump) might do cause 'he can do what ever he wants' _)

Anyway - I know this is getting long -  the general understanding (Ask Judge Napolitano) is he got caught trying to cheat on the 2020 election.

Think of this as a high-stakes card game and #OURcurrentPRESIDENT is the dealer and we catch him dealing off the bottom of the deck.

Are we to say, Oh, you're our current president and you can lie (16,000 times and counting), cheat (the Ukrainian scandal) and steal (violation of the emoluments clause etc.) the coming election and will cheer when you get 96 percent of the vote giving you bragging rights over  your bud Vlad!

And our reaction is supposed to be "Oh wonderful, you deal off the bottom so well we will make you 'dealer for life' and let Don jr. take your place when that horrible day comes and you're no longer with us?

Personally, I think the patriotic thing - and my family has roots that go back to those days of the original revolution - is to say, "We don't need no trucking King with his gold plated pisser."

Bottom line, #OURcurrentPRESIDENT cheats to win and I don't want him anywhere around government. In my opinion his efforts at cheating have lost him the privilege.
 

 

Nope. Even i he did what they say, it was well within the authority of the President of the United States.

The Democrats have made up a fairy tail and their allies in the corrupt media is supporting them. What the Dems are trying to do is to overturn an election.

That, is treason, and the Dems are guilty of it. Shame on them!! They will pay a heavy price in the next election.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is fairy tale, not tail.  I know because I know the difference between monkeys and people, something that obviously escapes republicans.

I'm so glad you're calling out Bolton for treason, although it seems to be for what I would consider a patriotic act.

Obviously the real challenge right now is to have witnesses for the 'impeachment trial' ... unless you're also believing #OURcurrentPRESIDENT LIES that the call and all his actions are 'perfect'.

You and everyone else around here know that 'perfection eludes us all' ... except, of course for the spawn of orangutan in the oval. (#OURcurrentPRESIDENT sued Bill Maher for suggesting such and lost because he is such a winner.)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that the wall to wall negative ads against #OURcurrentPRESIDENT are already being booked by the Bloomberg campaign for September and October and he's smarter than the 'genius' in the white house whose main claim to fame is he is a great - really - one of the greatest CHEATERS to have ever lived.  His personal motto is "winners cheat and cheaters win."

As I gather, Bloomberg is going to roll DJT like a dandy in central park with billions and billions more than Donny boy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, gpatt0n said:

I should add that the wall to wall negative ads against #OURcurrentPRESIDENT are already being booked by the Bloomberg campaign for September and October and he's smarter than the 'genius' in the white house whose main claim to fame is he is a great - really - one of the greatest CHEATERS to have ever lived.  His personal motto is "winners cheat and cheaters win."

As I gather, Bloomberg is going to roll DJT like a dandy in central park with billions and billions more than Donny boy.

I'm glad you can still dream, pubby. No one likes Bloomberg exept the party bosses, he's a joke. He'll only get the nomination because the DNC knows how dumb their voters are and will override them with the superdelagates.  That is how little the party bosses think of the rank and file Democratic voter.

That's all you will have in the next election.  Your party will get an epic beating because real Americans are tired of the lies and corruption from the Democratic Party.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Guard dad said:

I'm glad you can still dream, pubby. No one likes Bloomberg exept the party bosses, he's a joke. He'll only get the nomination because the DNC knows how dumb their voters are and will override them with the superdelagates.  That is how little the party bosses think of the rank and file Democratic voter.

That's all you will have in the next election.  Your party will get an epic beating because real Americans are tired of the lies and corruption from the Democratic Party.

 

 

I wish more REAL AMERICANS/ Paulding Countians that is... would/could see the VALUE in LOCALism and that other sites that claim to love this

county are NOT driven out of LOVE for the county, rather they are either driven by GOVT or BIG Business! (or BOTH)

54 more hours till the EPIC Bacon Wrapped Steak Drawing! :good:

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Caped Crusader said:

 

 

I wish more REAL AMERICANS/ Paulding Countians that is... would/could see the VALUE in LOCALism and that other sites that claim to love this

county are NOT driven out of LOVE for the county, rather they are either driven by GOVT or BIG Business! (or BOTH)

54 more hours till the EPIC Bacon Wrapped Steak Drawing! :good:

Local is extremely important, no doubt about it.

But so is national politics. Especially when the federal government has expanded far beyond it's constitutional scope and is taking away LOCAL rights and meddling in our business. If the trend continues, we LOCAL people won't have much say as to what happens here because everything will be decided on a Socialist national level.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Guard dad said:

Local is extremely important, no doubt about it.

But so is national politics. Especially when the federal government has expanded far beyond it's constitutional scope and is taking away LOCAL rights and meddling in our business. If the trend continues, we LOCAL people won't have much say as to what happens here because everything will be decided on a Socialist national level.

Let's consider for a moment what you said, GD, about rights.

Are you really ready to argue that your rights change based on where you are?  So where you are determines your right to life, liberty and property and it ends at the border of the town, county, state and nation.  So, do you might have a right to a jury trial in Georgia but not Alabama ... or to go  back to the 1950s, you might have the right to marry the person you love in California or New York but not Georgia or Alabama?

Rights, if you bother to spend just a few moments exploring the logic, tend to exist independent of where you are. That was the problem with Jim Crow is that when you crossed the mason-dixon line and you were of a specific color, your rights changed.

And rights are really independent of other things like money or even education.

Understanding the universality of human rights doesn't mean a rich person stuck on a isolated island doesn't have a right to health care, for instance. Indeed, that person, also regardless of how much wealth or how impoverished, would have the 'same health care access' on that deserted island with no doctors and hospitals. (Kind of like southwest Georgia these days)

The only point is that just because you are local you are not stripped of your rights and, notably, denying the things that you have a right to have by local authorities is wrong. 

So the question revolves around to what one's right's are ... and the understanding is they are, or should be universally protected and available.

The only thing I can surmise is that you confuse rights with responsibilities and performance with prerogatives.

PS: Bloomberg will not be the democratic nominee. Regardless, he sees the unstudied, gut-feeling approach of DJT as stupid and dangerous and given he has the cash to change it, he has stated his willingness to spend what it takes to assure the defeat of DJT.

PPS: Bloomberg in an interview, talked about his conversation with donny right after his election. Bloomberg said he advised #OURcurrentPRESIDENT to hire a bunch of people where were smarter than he was and take their advice noting that is what he did when he was first elected mayor of NYC and enjoyed basically two very successful terms of office.

Of course #OURcurrentPRESIDENT replied, "I can't do that because there is no one smarter than me."  That is the last time the two men talked.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Guard dad said:

Local is extremely important, no doubt about it.

But so is national politics. Especially when the federal government has expanded far beyond it's constitutional scope and is taking away LOCAL rights and meddling in our business. If the trend continues, we LOCAL people won't have much say as to what happens here because everything will be decided on a Socialist national level.

 

Yes Sir, I agree! With my WHOLE HEART....

Thankful you brought that up because to be a

HEALTHY LOCAL WEB PRESENCE

**** Here is what I would like YOUR suggestion

on... What is a HEALTHY Ratio of posts from an individual

here on p.com  on LOCAL VS NATIONAL....?????? :hi::wub:B):80

 

I Believe it should be a 1 to 1 ratio as that would indicate they are a PRODUCTIVE  poster in OUR Community?

 

Your TURN... we are VOTING on this SET RULE in the NEAR FUTURE amongst the OWNERS of Paulding.com

 

IMHO we have a FEW on HERE that have a difficult time balancing between the TWO! :drinks:

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Caped Crusader said:

 

Yes Sir, I agree! With my WHOLE HEART....

Thankful you brought that up because to be a

HEALTHY LOCAL WEB PRESENCE

**** Here is what I would like YOUR suggestion

on... What is a HEALTHY Ratio of posts from an individual

here on p.com  on LOCAL VS NATIONAL....?????? :hi::wub:B):80

 

I Believe it should be a 1 to 1 ratio as that would indicate they are a PRODUCTIVE  poster in OUR Community?

 

Your TURN... we are VOTING on this SET RULE in the NEAR FUTURE amongst the OWNERS of Paulding.com

 

IMHO we have a FEW on HERE that have a difficult time balancing between the TWO! :drinks:

I don't believe in imposing quotas on forum members.

I am active in local politics, but under the radar. There's been too much dirty retribution from elected officials.

Not to mention a certain 527 group owned by someone who has access to my information here who mails out dirty fliers.

Edited by Guard dad
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, gpatt0n said:

Let's consider for a moment what you said, GD, about rights.

Are you really ready to argue that your rights change based on where you are?  So where you are determines your right to life, liberty and property and it ends at the border of the town, county, state and nation.  So, do you might have a right to a jury trial in Georgia but not Alabama ... or to go  back to the 1950s, you might have the right to marry the person you love in California or New York but not Georgia or Alabama?

Rights, if you bother to spend just a few moments exploring the logic, tend to exist independent of where you are. That was the problem with Jim Crow is that when you crossed the mason-dixon line and you were of a specific color, your rights changed.

And rights are really independent of other things like money or even education.

Understanding the universality of human rights doesn't mean a rich person stuck on a isolated island doesn't have a right to health care, for instance. Indeed, that person, also regardless of how much wealth or how impoverished, would have the 'same health care access' on that deserted island with no doctors and hospitals. (Kind of like southwest Georgia these days)

The only point is that just because you are local you are not stripped of your rights and, notably, denying the things that you have a right to have by local authorities is wrong. 

So the question revolves around to what one's right's are ... and the understanding is they are, or should be universally protected and available.

The only thing I can surmise is that you confuse rights with responsibilities and performance with prerogatives.

PS: Bloomberg will not be the democratic nominee. Regardless, he sees the unstudied, gut-feeling approach of DJT as stupid and dangerous and given he has the cash to change it, he has stated his willingness to spend what it takes to assure the defeat of DJT.

PPS: Bloomberg in an interview, talked about his conversation with donny right after his election. Bloomberg said he advised #OURcurrentPRESIDENT to hire a bunch of people where were smarter than he was and take their advice noting that is what he did when he was first elected mayor of NYC and enjoyed basically two very successful terms of office.

Of course #OURcurrentPRESIDENT replied, "I can't do that because there is no one smarter than me."  That is the last time the two men talked.

 

I believe in the Constitution, and it does not claim healthcare or many other things that candidates are pushing are rights.

I also believe that the federal government has grown WAAAAAAY beyond the scope of their constitutional authority, and I can trace almost every problem we face back to this happening.

P.S. You really need to do something about your hatred for our president.  It's not healthy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awww come on, GD. I don't hate the guy and I don't even think Bloomberg hates the guy despite his willingness to spend billions to defeat him.  Some of us just reject the idea of president as king and an absolute ruler making self-serving decisions from the gut. Put a bit differently, we just don't put much value on personal 24k gold toilets that waste 60 gallons of water with each flush.

As far as rights, you need to revisit history. When the new world was discovered there were no democracies and Kings were apt to have people's heads on a pike for petty disagreements. Oh, and the world was flat and the universe revolved around the earth and if you didn't buy that malarkey the preachers would dunk you in a pond, draw and quarter you or put you on a rack. 

So, where did those rights we have now come from?

I would suggest they come from the hopes, dreams, wants and needs of mankind and those hopes, dreams, wants and needs change over time.  I mean I doubt if George Washington had any notion of a man living on a space station and feeding the hope of at least some men to make humanity a cosmic being.

And let me assure you that even on earth, with 7+ billion people and the advent of new viruses like the  coronavirus and the chance of a pandemic, we might all hope that health care might become a right.  (BTW, a simulation of a coronavirus run before the discovery of the one in China, gamed itself into a pandemic that resulted in the 'gaming' death of 65 million. Link)

What is critical to the establishment of rights, frankly, are changes in circumstance. One thing we know is whenever you have a concentration of animals - take chickens -  epidemics happen.  Unlike a chicken farm, which when a bird flu or other disease 'happens' results in the extermination and burial of every chicken often counted in the millions. Common sense says you can't do that with people as they object. That is a key argument for universal health care and at least one of the arguments for health care as a right.

You are welcome to disagree but then the consequences of valuing gold toilets will eventually be measured in millions more deaths from a pandemic.

Bottom line, IMHO, what you may call conservatism - which is nickel and dime-ing public health and depriving vulnerable groups of healthcare - is failing to accept the collective responsibility mankind should take over the human circumstance in an increasingly complex world.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, gpatt0n said:

Awww come on, GD. I don't hate the guy and I don't even think Bloomberg hates the guy despite his willingness to spend billions to defeat him.  Some of us just reject the idea of president as king and an absolute ruler making self-serving decisions from the gut. Put a bit differently, we just don't put much value on personal 24k gold toilets that waste 60 gallons of water with each flush.

As far as rights, you need to revisit history. When the new world was discovered there were no democracies and Kings were apt to have people's heads on a pike for petty disagreements. Oh, and the world was flat and the universe revolved around the earth and if you didn't buy that malarkey the preachers would dunk you in a pond, draw and quarter you or put you on a rack. 

So, where did those rights we have now come from?

I would suggest they come from the hopes, dreams, wants and needs of mankind and those hopes, dreams, wants and needs change over time.  I mean I doubt if George Washington had any notion of a man living on a space station and feeding the hope of at least some men to make humanity a cosmic being.

And let me assure you that even on earth, with 7+ billion people and the advent of new viruses like the  coronavirus and the chance of a pandemic, we might all hope that health care might become a right.  (BTW, a simulation of a coronavirus run before the discovery of the one in China, gamed itself into a pandemic that resulted in the 'gaming' death of 65 million. Link)

What is critical to the establishment of rights, frankly, are changes in circumstance. One thing we know is whenever you have a concentration of animals - take chickens -  epidemics happen.  Unlike a chicken farm, which when a bird flu or other disease 'happens' results in the extermination and burial of every chicken often counted in the millions. Common sense says you can't do that with people as they object. That is a key argument for universal health care and at least one of the arguments for health care as a right.

You are welcome to disagree but then the consequences of valuing gold toilets will eventually be measured in millions more deaths from a pandemic.

Bottom line, IMHO, what you may call conservatism - which is nickel and dime-ing public health and depriving vulnerable groups of healthcare - is failing to accept the collective responsibility mankind should take over the human circumstance in an increasingly complex world.

 

Well, you just typed a whole lot of words with virtually no value, just petty insults. Not to mention a lot of envy.

What business is it of yours what he does with his money?

I didn't mention conservatism above, and as usual, you made plenty of ad hominem attacks. II could respect you a lot more if you would discuss actual issues and maybe asking me what my position is on certain topics instead of just ASSuming what I believe and attacking me on it.

This kind of crap from you is EXACTLY what killed your site and a lot of the reason why no one wants to post here now...because you;re still here and still being rude and insulting.

Really, I don't care. But I do feel bad for the people who actually paid you money for what you destroyed.

I'm reminded of why I don't like posting here. Time to go back to where intelligent people have civil discussion.

Ciao

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, gpatt0n said:

Awww come on, GD. I don't hate the guy 

 

 

Well, you sure spend a Hell of a lot of time babbling a bunch of made-up propaganda about the President of the United States.   I'd hate to see what would happen if you DID hate him.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW... I'm TRULY disappointed in the DEEP animosity towards OUR fellow Human BEING from ALL parties posting

in this THREAD! :cray:

 

With that being SAID.... I do BELIEVE we will have a NEW Rule for the POLTICS portion that NOT 1 of you

will be able to ABIDE by, by the stroke of MIDNIGHT!

⏰

 

let's Play NICE or let's ALL go to 🕰️ OUT! :give_rose:

 

Caped :hi:

Link to post
Share on other sites
There comes a time
When we heed a certain call
When the world must come together as one
There are people dying
Oh, and it's time to lend a hand to life
The greatest gift of all
We can't go on
Pretending day-by-day
That someone, somewhere soon make a change
We're all a part of God's great big family
And the truth, you know, love is all we need
We are the world
We are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day, so let's start giving
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me
Oh, send them your heart
So they know that someone cares
And their lives will be stronger and free
As God has shown us by turning stones to bread
And so we all must lend a helping hand
We are the world
We are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day, so let's start giving
Oh, there's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me
When you're down and out, there seems no hope at all
But if you just believe there's no way we can fall
Well, well, well, well let us realize
Oh, that a change can only come
When we stand together as one, yeah, yeah, yeah
We are the world
We are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day, so let's start giving
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me
We are the world
We are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day, so let's start giving
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and mee
We are the world (are the world)
We are the children (are the children)
We are the ones who'll make a brighter day, so let's start giving (so let's start giving)
There is a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me
Oh, let me hear you!
We are the world (we are the world)
We are the children (said we are the children)
We are the ones who'll make a brighter day so let start giving (so let's start giving)
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me, come on now, let me hear you
We are the world (we are the world)
We are the children (we are the children)
We are the ones who'll make a brighter day so let's start giving (so let's start giving)
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me, yeah
We are the world (we are the world)
We are the children (we are the children)
We are the ones who'll make a brighter day so let's start giving (so let's start giving)
There's a choice we're making
And we're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me
We are the world (are the world)
We are the children (are the children)
We are the ones who'll make a brighter day so let's start giving (so let's start giving)
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me
We are the world, we are the world (are the world)
We are the children, yes sir (are the children)
We are the ones that make a brighter day so let's start giving (so let's start giving)
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
It's true we'll make a better day, just you and me, ooh-hoo!
We are the world (dear God) (are the world)
We are the children (are the children)
We are the ones that make a brighter day so let's start giving (all right, can you hear what I'm saying?)
There's a choice we're making, we're saving our own lives

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Caped Crusader said:

WOW... I'm TRULY disappointed in the DEEP animosity towards OUR fellow Human BEING from ALL parties posting

in this THREAD! :cray:

 

With that being SAID.... I do BELIEVE we will have a NEW Rule for the POLTICS portion that NOT 1 of you

will be able to ABIDE by, by the stroke of MIDNIGHT!

⏰

 

let's Play NICE or let's ALL go to 🕰️ OUT! :give_rose:

 

Caped :hi:

I truly believe you mean well, but I have to ask some questions:

Are we to actually believe that the founder of this forum who is still an owner with admin access will go to time out?  Respectfully, sir, I doubt it.

As long as he posts his hatred here and slanders members and posts his ad hominem attacks on us, it will be extremely difficult to have civil discussion. Many of us want to, but the hate in his heart makes him incapable of playing nice.

You have decisions to make, my friend, if you are to protect your investment.


 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/27/2020 at 2:49 PM, gpatt0n said:

I was talking to my wife earlier about Bernie while we were watching the view.  Megan McCain started hyping Bernie - I'm thinking he's the GOP chosen candidate now that the slander plan for Joe Biden has been exposed - and said she thinks people like him because he's the inverse of #OURcurrentPRESIDENT

I replied, "Yea, he's the Joe Stalin to Donald #OURcurrentPRESIDENT's Hitler imitation"

Kind of apt, actually.

PS: I'm not sure I like this hashtag thingy.

 

 

Okay, stupid is back to ask..

What in the world does this mean? ^^^^

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, mach4 said:

 

 

Okay, stupid is back to ask..

What in the world does this mean? ^^^^

There was a forum setting that replaced the word Trump with that text instead.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...