Jump to content
Paulding.com

Are the canidates who they say they are?

Animal

By Animal,
in Paulding County NEWS

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

Animal

Animal

Posted
Posted

I have discovered some disturbing news, about some of the canidates seeking office. Wow I will be back with my six shooter. People know the truth will get out so why do it?

 

Ok I am going hunting for some politicans,I prefer mine medium rare.I will be keeping voters updated on what I uncover.Inquiry minds of P.Com want to know :p

Link to post
Share on other sites
Animal

Animal

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I will say this as soon as I gather my paper work to back it all up. I am saying that the ant-growth group should be ashamed of them selves.I thought they were on a mission.But nooooo they heat up the spirit of whats wrong in our government. Ok ya'll had better run for cover because my guns going to be blazing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
publisher1

publisher1

Posted
Posted

I think I know what this is all about........Pubby is pregnant. May God bless his soul.

 

 

Who's the daddy?

 

 

 

That's the 50,000.00 question. I bet some young, hot babe trapped him.

 

 

Uhh ... this is amazing ... If I deny it, I become a boring old man who is not hot at all ...

 

If I admit they'll say I'm just another politician and you know how politicians lie.

 

If I don't say anything, I've entered a no-win territory ... so here is my answer :

 

 

one click is too easy

Not so fast!

keep clicking!

my answer is

I wish :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Patton "Pat" Hughes (aka: pubby)

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
lowrider

lowrider

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

Uhh ... this is amazing ... If I deny it, I become a boring old man who is not hot at all ...

 

If I admit they'll say I'm just another politician and you know how politicians lie.

 

If I don't say anything, I've entered a no-win territory ... so here is my answer :

 

 

one click is too easy

Not so fast!

keep clicking!

my answer is

I wish :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Patton "Pat" Hughes (aka: pubby)

 

 

:rofl:

Link to post
Share on other sites
cookies are sweet

cookies are sweet

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

Uhh ... this is amazing ... If I deny it, I become a boring old man who is not hot at all ...

 

If I admit they'll say I'm just another politician and you know how politicians lie.

 

If I don't say anything, I've entered a no-win territory ... so here is my answer :

 

 

one click is too easy

Not so fast!

keep clicking!

my answer is

I wish :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Patton "Pat" Hughes (aka: pubby)

 

Ok, that was funny.

Really? I heard Guard Dads name.

 

 

Chelsea Clinton :pardon:

 

Same person, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
rockysmom

rockysmom

Posted
Posted

Uhh ... this is amazing ... If I deny it, I become a boring old man who is not hot at all ...

 

If I admit they'll say I'm just another politician and you know how politicians lie.

 

If I don't say anything, I've entered a no-win territory ... so here is my answer :

 

 

one click is too easy

Not so fast!

keep clicking!

my answer is

I wish :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Patton "Pat" Hughes (aka: pubby)

Something tells me you may have lots and lots of company!

 

So, how are you feeling? Are you over the morning sickness yet?

Oh no you ditn't

OF COURSE I did!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
publisher1

publisher1

Posted
Posted

Something tells me you may have lots and lots of company!

 

So, how are you feeling? Are you over the morning sickness yet?

 

OF COURSE I did!! :)

 

Well, they do favor one another.

 

 

On the issue of morning sickness ... that is a sensitive subject Rockysmom.  And the relationship between Guarddad and Chelsea ... well I can say that I've met Chelsea's mom and I haven't met guarddads mom but I'm pretty sure they are different.

 

Please recognize that as a democratic candidate for Post 2 in the state of Georgia, I've got to be careful or somehow this will turn into a serious issue with steep moral implications.

 

So, be prepared to click to hear what may be the best answer for all.

 

See, pregnancy does present its self as sickness in the morning

 

and there are a host of related medical complications with pregnancy

 

medical issues from high blood pressure to diabetes are quite possible

 

... and we have not even gotten to the complications of pregnancy to the fetus, which can be based on risk factors such as the age of the mother.  You can imagine how that can be complicated by the notion that it is a male who is pregnant and the research and other aspects that may have impact on the millions of 63 year old men who too could become pregnant.  It is in that context that I take cautious pride

 

... as a Democrat in offering the following video, which was just posted today

 

to celebrate obamacare's coverage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So now you know why I posted Chelsea's pregnancy instead of that. I am in Paulding County, after all. George Patton "Pat" Hughes (aka: pubby)
Link to post
Share on other sites
gpatt0n

gpatt0n

Posted
Posted

Hitman:

 

I've seen this bit of information on the net. I've known about it for some time and it doesn't fit the image or background of the person named.

 

As a journalist, the allegations made by what is allegedly a criminal person are not credible enough for a couple of reasons. The first being the source - anyone could make this allegation - the second being the timing - why now? and the third - the anonymity and ability of anyone to have made that assertion for any reason.

 

The plain truth is that anyone could have posed allegation. There presentation of a widely available mug shot, the lack of other corroborating material.and understanding there is no way to ascertain the truth or falsity of the charge all point to a political hatchet job. Barring solid evidence, credit card receipts, a face-to-face confrontation or additional allegations from other individuals, nothing of that kind will be presented here.

 

pubby

 

PS: You note I'm posting as pubby - publisher and owner of paulding.com and you can bet I'm serious about these unfounded allegations being published here. Know that I'm not into negative campaigning and indeed spoke out against the incumbent state senator for the area defined as Post 2 in 2012 on the subject of such negative campaigning.

 

Truth that can be confirmed is another subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites
rockysmom

rockysmom

Posted
Posted

Hitman:

 

I've seen this bit of information on the net. I've known about it for some time and it doesn't fit the image or background of the person named.

 

As a journalist, the allegations made by what is allegedly a criminal person are not credible enough for a couple of reasons. The first being the source - anyone could make this allegation - the second being the timing - why now? and the third - the anonymity and ability of anyone to have made that assertion for any reason.

 

The plain truth is that anyone could have posed allegation. There presentation of a widely available mug shot, the lack of other corroborating material.and understanding there is no way to ascertain the truth or falsity of the charge all point to a political hatchet job. Barring solid evidence, credit card receipts, a face-to-face confrontation or additional allegations from other individuals, nothing of that kind will be presented here.

 

pubby

 

PS: You note I'm posting as pubby - publisher and owner of paulding.com and you can bet I'm serious about these unfounded allegations being published here. Know that I'm not into negative campaigning and indeed spoke out against the incumbent state senator for the area defined as Post 2 in 2012 on the subject of such negative campaigning.

 

Truth that can be confirmed is another subject.

Very, very excellent. Seriously.

Link to post
Share on other sites
cookies are sweet

cookies are sweet

Posted
Posted

Hitman:

 

I've seen this bit of information on the net. I've known about it for some time and it doesn't fit the image or background of the person named.

 

As a journalist, the allegations made by what is allegedly a criminal person are not credible enough for a couple of reasons. The first being the source - anyone could make this allegation - the second being the timing - why now? and the third - the anonymity and ability of anyone to have made that assertion for any reason.

 

The plain truth is that anyone could have posed allegation. There presentation of a widely available mug shot, the lack of other corroborating material.and understanding there is no way to ascertain the truth or falsity of the charge all point to a political hatchet job. Barring solid evidence, credit card receipts, a face-to-face confrontation or additional allegations from other individuals, nothing of that kind will be presented here.

 

pubby

 

PS: You note I'm posting as pubby - publisher and owner of paulding.com and you can bet I'm serious about these unfounded allegations being published here. Know that I'm not into negative campaigning and indeed spoke out against the incumbent state senator for the area defined as Post 2 in 2012 on the subject of such negative campaigning.

 

Truth that can be confirmed is another subject.

 

Good job pubby.

I always tell my wife, if the story doesn't make sense, there is a reason it doesn't make sense.'

Usually because it is not the truth.

And some stories are just so badly told, it is easy to see they are not the truth.

Yep, everyone I know that saw it said that dog won't hunt here.

If it is false we have a very, very serious issue in this county.

That goes way too far.

 

Then "we have a very, very serious issue in this county."

Link to post
Share on other sites
publisher1

publisher1

Posted
Posted

You need not presume.

 

I also think I discovered the gender-bending aspects of the the twist this topic took. You know morning sickness and me being preggo. Yep, I thought it may have had something to do with the posting about Chelsea being pregnant.

 

Come to find out that It likely has something to do with the "androgynous Pat" skits they used to have on SNL ... Of course that is why I went for my 'by line' name as G. Patton Hughes going way back - "Pat" was my nickname as a youth ... like from the days I could first spell ... P-A-T "Pat" is a firm memory standing on a neighbors' back door asking to come in and play as a three or four year old.

 

Of course my given name is not confusing in terms of gender at all - George Patton Hughes - George being my great, great grandfather's name - the one that was a resident of Cherokee County Georgia before Cherokee County was split into Paulding, Cobb, Polk, etc. (circa 1825).

 

Still you can understand most people with androgynous names are often tired of the jokes they've had to endure since before middle school.

 

So, most folks were good with my humorous effort.

 

And that would have been fine if I hadn't run across this 'official' element/ usage.

 

Apparently the Paulding County Election Board decided to change my gender 'officially' ... well not like marking me female.

 

Rather here is the official listing of candidates:

 

post-48206-0-74356100-1397844815_thumb.jpg

 

Well, I can say that I'm for Georgia and I never thought of Georgia in the way that the French use variations of words (or completely different words) to denote whether an object or person is male or female - and I'm not so sure that it is going to hurt me in the primary given the percentage of Democrats who are women ...

 

Hopefully, though, it is not on the ballot this way and do know that this was not some underhanded stealth move to bring me favor for female voters and I can prove it.

 

I mean is there anyone red blooded American Guy who would not love to have the name George Patton Hughes!

 

George Patton "Pat" Hughes

Link to post
Share on other sites
rockysmom

rockysmom

Posted
Posted

You need not presume.

 

I also think I discovered the gender-bending aspects of the the twist this topic took. You know morning sickness and me being preggo. Yep, I thought it may have had something to do with the posting about Chelsea being pregnant.

 

Come to find out that It likely has something to do with the "androgynous Pat" skits they used to have on SNL ... Of course that is why I went for my 'by line' name as G. Patton Hughes going way back - "Pat" was my nickname as a youth ... like from the days I could first spell ... P-A-T "Pat" is a firm memory standing on a neighbors' back door asking to come in and play as a three or four year old.

 

Of course my given name is not confusing in terms of gender at all - George Patton Hughes - George being my great, great grandfather's name - the one that was a resident of Cherokee County Georgia before Cherokee County was split into Paulding, Cobb, Polk, etc. (circa 1825).

 

Still you can understand most people with androgynous names are often tired of the jokes they've had to endure since before middle school.

 

So, most folks were good with my humorous effort.

 

And that would have been fine if I hadn't run across this 'official' element/ usage.

 

Apparently the Paulding County Election Board decided to change my gender 'officially' ... well not like marking me female.

 

Rather here is the official listing of candidates:

 

attachicon.gifgeorgiapattonhughes.JPG

 

Well, I can say that I'm for Georgia and I never thought of Georgia in the way that the French use variations of words (or completely different words) to denote whether an object or person is male or female - and I'm not so sure that it is going to hurt me in the primary given the percentage of Democrats who are women ...

 

Hopefully, though, it is not on the ballot this way and do know that this was not some underhanded stealth move to bring me favor for female voters and I can prove it.

 

I mean is there anyone red blooded American Guy who would not love to have the name George Patton Hughes!

 

George Patton "Pat" Hughes

OMG! How funny is that? LOL!

Link to post
Share on other sites
gpatt0n

gpatt0n

Posted
Posted

I'm still trying to figure out why Pubby addressed Hitman when Animal was the poster. Did Hitman post something that was deleted?

 

Hitman, whom I KNOW is not animal, posted some links. I don't know the identity of Hitman but I do Animal . Animal is not responsible for the objectionable posting.

 

Animal pull this crap every election.............When his masters contrive misinformation they will tell him he is allowed to spew it on pcom.

 

He will giggle maniacally and slobber on his keyboard to do their bidding

 

Animal has not pulled any crap this election. I find your condescension toward the man rather unbecoming and your characterization of his demeanor likely a flight of fantasy. I mean I doubt if you've ever seen him posting.

 

I just find these comments fall in the category of false accusations which are no more welcome than the one's that I set invisible.

 

pubby

Link to post
Share on other sites
publisher1

publisher1

Posted
Posted

I think folks should remember a couple of things.

 

Being the owner and having moderation responsibilities on pcom are not going to go away because I'm running for office. I am not going to be a pushover in this job - my full time pursuit - because I am seeking a second job as a post commissioner.

 

I actually think winning the post would allow me to do both better but the task I have here, by its very nature, requires that I state what I think and do what I do with the important element being the the truth of the news presented.

 

I'm sure perfection has eluded me but I do try to do what is right in my own mind.

 

George Patton 'Pat' Hughes

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
gpatt0n

gpatt0n

Posted
Posted

And animal, if it were about you and the escort, it would be deleted too.

 

Folks there are allegations out there that appear to be planted slanders. I say that because that just seem so contrived as to be totally without credibility.

 

As far as to why an escort may say something about a politician, consider that those in that profession will do just about anything for money. Among the services I imagine are available is the public slandering of politicians.

 

pubby

Link to post
Share on other sites
WHITEY

WHITEY

Posted
Posted

And animal, if it were about you and the escort, it would be deleted too.

 

Folks there are allegations out there that appear to be planted slanders. I say that because that just seem so contrived as to be totally without credibility.

 

As far as to why an escort may say something about a politician, consider that those in that profession will do just about anything for money. Among the services I imagine are available is the public slandering of politicians.

 

pubby

And you would close this thread if you did not want this out there, of course this would not fit into LPPT and your game plan on this issue.... Shame on you!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
LPPT

LPPT

Posted
Posted

And you would close this thread if you did not want this out there, of course this would not fit into LPPT and your game plan on this issue.... Shame on you!!!!

When it comes to politics and campaigns you see everything as manipulation and strategy.

Bottom line there is no strategy to this issue.

It is called integrity and honor, maybe that is an alien concept to you.

The decisions on this issue were made on those grounds.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
gpatt0n

gpatt0n

Posted
Posted

But I do think that closing this topic is the right thing to do.

 

However, Whitey, keep in mind that I don't close a lot of your topics I'd like to close. I have strong feelings about free speech and when I see BS, I call it as that and I think I have here.

 

pubby

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...