zoocrew

Not if does not watch TV or listen to the news. It is strange that no one called him ... unless the family just doesn't have many friends.

Before? You mean when women were nothing more than chattel and weren't allowed the legal remedies of divorce? Back when women were beaten and raped and yet told they must remain married because that is what God wanted and Canterbury would disavow your place in society structure? You mean back when women had no choice over their own bodies and had to have as many children as their bodies would allow and their husbands wanted? I'm sure God was really pleased with that situation. Please. This has nothing to do with politics nor with God. It has to do with a mad man that did something ter

Except in this case, there is nothing hidden. It is on each bill. AGL gets paid each month from everyone because it is their line the commodity that is being purchased passes. That is why it is best to compare prices on a side-by-side basis when negotiating which provider from whom the commodity is purchased. The providers should explain this pass through charge when you sign up when you ask, "what are the monthly costs associated with my using you as a provider, including any mandatory charges associated with my being a customer of any provider?

Perhaps some sort of home improvement merchant would have things like outside winter wear and would have something to your liking.

This fee has always been there. It is called the Pass Through Connection Charge from AGLC. You just never noticed it. My link

Why shouldn't the person and his family be able to make the decision? Dying with dignity is far better on the family and teh society as a whole.

Not all the discussion was about preventing this tragedy but about other future ones.

Doesn't matter from whom you buy the gas. The owner of the pipeline charges, also.

That is not my question. I never said anything about individual liberty or anything about trying to force a private citizen. You said that. Please try to follow along. I said there is no way one parent can adequately educate a child in the required subject matter because there is no way that parent is adequately knowledgeable to have a mastery of the material. That means the child is not being taught by a trained person in each field and that is short changing the education of the child. Now please tell us what your field of study was at university so we can ascertain your level of exp

And obviously a reasonable discussion understands that a gun kills more and faster than a man wielding a knife.

And you obviously don't understand that education involves someone who knows the material well enough to explain and spur more mastery of the subject. Just curious as to what you studied at university so we will know your area of particular training?

And had it been a gun the number would have been much higher, would it not? :Let's be reasonable.. Insanity.

There is no way you have the ability to be competent in the subject materials as a certified teacher. No way. You are short changing your child. And the idea of arming teachers shows how far crazy American society has become.

OOook.

Then you should know the 1960s had plenty of bad language, unwed pregnancies and all around violent behavior also, right? I mean, Vietnam was pretty violent. So were the church bombings in AL. The civil rights worker killings.

OK. Do you really need me to discuss the 1960s? It's "proven" but, no, it wasn't.

I think it is a shame there are so many uneducated people worldwide when we know education is the number one indicator of success in life for themselves and their children, and ultimately the society as a whole.

OK. How about WW II? Have you read the accounts of out of wedlock births of WACS and young ladies involved with military personnel on leave, or before shipped out? How about the language used in the military? Come on.

Bull. Anyone who has read the accounts of even the Colonial American era knows that cursing was rampant; killing in public was common places; unwed pregnancies were a problem then too. Come on. Open your history books. Ever read the Scarlett Letter? Remember Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton?

NO, I simply pointed out that your original statement was factually incorrect when you said your rights were being taken away.

Answer: none.

And what rights of yours is anyone trying to remove?

Isn't it a couple's choice to marry or not; divorce or notl; have children or not? Only totalitarian states dictate such things for its people.

So what's your proposal? Outlaw single parent homes? How do you do that? That. Is. Insane. Arming teachers? Insane.

Government cannot force people to stay together unless you want a totalitarian state. The American Constitution prohibits any preferential treatment of religion. The media is not controlled by the government unless you want a totalitarian state. What you're calling for is impossible except via loss of civil rights.