eym_sirius

You show a keen eye for inclement weather, JM! From "Both Sides Now" I've looked at boobs from both sides now From up and down, and still somehow It's boob-illusions I recall I really don't know boobs at all..... No --- Me? I could never be mean!!

And I'm not sure if it's boobcleavage or asscleavage. You can see a lot in the cloud formations!

I think that the cleavage belongs to "GLMW", the wife. I could be wrong.

Didjall ever consider that GALINEMANSWIFE's tornado pic looks like boobs if you turn it upside down?

So now it's been about three weeks and not a sign of poor Kyron. It looks like this one may have gone cold.

Why don't you start the McChrystal for President, 2012 movement, PSD? You can say that it all started here on PCOM!!!

I wonder what the child molester does with so many email accounts! http://www.peoplefinders.com/search/searchpreview.aspx?vw=people&input=email&ln=Phipps&fn=Tony&city=Eugene&state=OR Now, this could belong to someone else, another "Tony Phipps"..... 36, of Eugene OR. It says that he's a "transient" but white pages lists an address and phone number for him, close to where the attempted abduction took place.

Late Kudos to the organ donor!

Usually when we're frustrated, we make assumptions and just fly off in that direction and panic when the resolution isn't found there. It's probably NOT the washer. Go from there. That's how you'll find the ring.

There's no opening big enough for a ring to go through, is there?

RDSQRL (Kyron's StepMom's Vanity License Plate) = Terri, That Red Squirrel Copyright 2006 by R. Neil HormanCover art by Kimberly Dahm, 2001 Northwest Tales I: Visit Tommy, the Flying Raccoon, Buddy the not too tall cat, Billy, the Rolling Possum all at Rolf's Hideout in Tokens of Trust; and Terri, That Red Squirrel in the soon to appear Northwest Tales II. http://northwesttales.com/ That led me to this in the links: Seattle Author - Melvin H. HormanAgainst the Wall When I clicked on that link, here's what I saw:

I think that this is an opportunity for Obama to show that it is the naysayers like McChrystal who have kept the surge from being successful. If the coming weeks show progress in Afghanistan, then McChrystal may start to look really bad, as the guy who was holding back success because he wouldn't get on board.

Sure McChrystal dissed Obama! He said that he was intimidated by the big brass at meetings. That paints Obama as a wuss! And IMO, it was the looming wuss factor that Obama has to beat back at every opportunity. In his press conference, Obama said (insubordination) won't be tolerated. He was direct, in charge, and began -- what Joe Liebermann called "a turning point in his Presidency" It was rank insubordination and Obama had no other choice but to show McChrystal the door with the help of his boot. I also disagree that this was planned by McChrystal. I think that his hubris got the be

Stoked? For a lifetime military person, to get drummed out for loud-talking the Commander-in-Chief? It's the equivalent of a public flogging in the nude. He's been (properly) shamed for breaking ranks. The chain of command in the service is a constant, not a variable. It's a blemish on his record and to see it as anything positive is spin.

Aren't you about 8 years and nine months too late to be asking that question?

I think that whether a question is MEANT to be answered can only be determined by the person asking it. You may not wish to respond, which is -- now why did you respond?

It's not a surprise to me that he's out. The President said that if Tony Hayward worked for him, he's a'done been-fired him! No superior can accept that level of rank insubordination, IMO.

Geez, you too? HYPOTHETICAL! It's not REAL. Do you think only in black and white? See if you can do it this way. Take YOUR concept of the country thriving --- whatever that means, economic, social -- whatever, we're thriving like never before!! (remember it's hypothetical!) 1)Would you rather have our country in excellent health, thriving for the next 2 1/2 years (knowing that this probably would mean reelection for Obama) Or 2) Would you rather that our country does not thrive and struggles, flounders, collapses during the next 2 1/2 years (knowing that this would probab

Eym would say that our present form of government does not work. Eym would say that there is no one qualified for the office of President, because no job experience on earth could possiby prepare a person for the job of President. You see, over the last half-century or so, the power of the Presidency has increased as Congress has abdicated it's proper position as the legislative branch. Nowadays, the Executive branch of government writes many of the laws and Congress merely rubber-stamps them. That's because the main goal of Congress, individually and as a member of one of the two main pa

MCM - I'm sure that you can see that the question was a hypothetical one. I'll state it again. Which would you choose: 1) The country thrives for the next 2 1/2 years and Obama stands a good chance of reelection or 2) The country does not thrive and Obama has a good chance of NOT being elected. This question isn't aimed at ANY particular White House policies, but rather at attitudes that are geared to cheer our country's failures while the opposition party is in power. And -- although the question is for ShortyRT, anyone can answer it with a 1 or a 2 vote.

To ShortyRT: When you get back, give the above questions a try!

No, a General should not publicly criticize his superior. If that becomes acceptable, then a colonel can disrespect a general, a private can diss his sergeant, etc. There's a chain of command, there's protocol. There are rules for behavior and for good order. Why did you have to bring in the color of the President? This pertains to the discussion of McChrystal ---- how? I understand that a black President is not your color of choice. But the country voted for him in favor of any other candidate. The country will thrive if everyone were to get behind the President and support him. Are you

I disagree. Promoters -- promote. If they sink enough money into promoting you, you WILL rise to the top. Nowadays, generally speaking, promotors are promoting crapola. So it the crappy music and crappy performers who rise to prominence. This is not what they public is hungry for. It's all that they are being force-fed by the promoters, who are simply going by a formula for filling stadiums with young fans. The message that a performer HAS to be beautiful? Promoters! As a result, the culture has morphed into one that expects only beauty and it's that beauty that now passes for talent

Yes. It's like the song is a 3 - 4 infomercial promoting the performer. It used to be all about the song. But now, after hearing a pop country song - I can't tell you what the song is about! Videos - invariably the video will have the woman performer rolling around on a bed looking seductively up at the camera. How many of these does a person need to see before he understands that music promoters are cookie-cutting their product? The same tired formula, the same, predictable product.

Let me make sure that I understand you correctly. It's good for subordinates to openly criticize their superiors? It's good for the leader of our country, the President of the United States, to be ridiculed instead of supported? It's appropriate to openly undermine authority? What you are advocating is anarchy. You live in a world where the attempt to embarrass the leader of our country is applauded by you and those of your ilk. Your goal? Apparently to bring down the leadership of this country. That goal seems extremely anti-American to me. Remember, President Obama still has 2 1/2 years