Foxmeister

Those with a clear understanding of the laws regarding the handling of classified information understand what Clinton was doing is illegal.

As long as they are a US citizen, they have the right to vote. We conservatives believe wasteful spending should be eliminated. There are things the government is constitutionally obligated to finance, such as providing a national defense. Personally, we shouldn't give illegals access to welfare programs. Social Security needs to be protected, but I also believe in giving people the option of opting out of it if they wish to invest their money in a better retirement plan for themselves.

When you assume someone should suspect another is an illegal immigrant simply because the person is speaking Spanish, is racism.

20 with four deployments in war zones where we undertook direct and indirect fire.

Not at all and you know that.

His attacking my 29 years of military service is nothing more than an attempt on his part to divert from the topic, while at the same time attempting to bait me into becoming someone like him. Not working because I will not lower my standards of conduct to his.

It was indeed a racist statement. Obviously you are also a sexist as you seem to think RM cannot handle herself in a debate. Your last line also shows you are a hypocrite.

It does make sense. You claim Trump as the owner of Mar-a-Largo should have known and been responsible for two illegals working there; even though he has others he hired to manage the place, to include hiring personnel. In other words, the owner is responsible. That would mean pubby as the owner of this site is responsible for everything that goes on here - good and bad.

I could post links to prove each one of those statements are spin, but you would only call them lies. You blindly believe every single piece your party puts out there.

Any immigrant identified to be in this country should be deported. Do you not agree? Not an attempt to divert at all. I'm calling CC out on the statement he made. It was in fact a racist statement.

I find it funny how you parrot crap your party puts out. Do a little research and you will find they are spinning sheeze out of context.

If a person is heard speaking Spanish, it should be assumed they are illegals? I'd say that is a racist statement.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

In other words, you don't think Hillary should be prosecuted for breaking the law.

Did anyone notice how pubby avoided answering my question?

Here's the deal with you - no matter what he had done; you would have found something about it to complain. Had he stayed there for a half-hour, you would have complained he made the public stand outside in the cold to wait that much longer. Had his wife been smiling, you would have made some negative comment about that. What is the appropriate facial expression someone should have when standing in front of a casket. I would like to know because my mother's funeral was a week ago yesterday. Every single person who walked up to her coffin to pay their last respects during the viewing a

You really do have a problem. How long should he have stayed; a half-hour, hour? The news media was all over the rotunda all while it was open to let the public in to pay their respects. Like I said, you have a problem. With all the hate you have inside you, you should seek the help of a professional. Seriously.

What evidence has Muellar's investigation revealed? Nothing; yet you act as if evidence has proven he's guilty.

The very last sentence of your post demonstrates how hypocritical you really are; especially in the post I am responding to. First of all, you attempting to excuse her violation of a federal law in an attempt to minimize the number of email chains there were on her server. All it takes is one violation to send any other person to prison for sending just one email containing classified information over a non-secure server. You continue to state Trump violated laws, but so far not one single piece of evidence has been revealed that he did. This is typical of you. You are quick to judge a

What I am saying is there has always been huge financial risks for farmers. Farms have been going bankrupt for decades and large agricultural corporations have been buying them out. Farmers have been subsidized by the government for decades attempting to keep them solvent. Farmers have probably received more government assistance than any other type of business. Hell, they get money from the government not to leave fields vacant.

In total, the investigation found 110 emails in 52 email chains containing information that was classified at the time it was sent or received. Eight chains contained top secret information, the highest level of classification, 36 chains contained secret information, and the remaining eight contained confidential information. Most of these emails, however, did not contain markings clearly delineating their status.

The point is the investigation was started after it was learned classified information was being sent through her private server.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/11/guccifer-hacker-who-exposed-private-clinton-email-/

We all know how liberal the NYT is. Business Insider is left of center and is owned by a German news company.

Obviously the point being made in the graph went over your head. You're blaming Trump for a reported increase in farm bankruptcies. The graph shows farm bankruptcies are not uncommon at all and at times have been very high; to include the Bush and Obama administrations. I'm sure if you go back even further, you would see a high trend of farm bankruptcies.