Mustluvdogs

Looking at the front of the courthouse, right side around the back, middle (if that makes sense) where there's the gas pipes etc., there's no barrier between parking and those pipes. Someone could hit the gas instead of the brakes and it would be a huge disaster. Just an FYI if someone knows the 'powers that be' they should be alerted about it.

Not up on this story, but here's this: http://www.neighbornewspapers.com/view/full_story/26550853/article-Paulding-chairman-will-back-workers-doing-background-checks

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3doIasZRv2h8VQ-VGJQnGfAgE9p0zAIt

I watched the video closely, there is a wire that's appears to be connected perhaps to his chest.

Thanks everyone for all the information.

How many times EACH day on the local news do they show a video of a black guy or guys holding up a store at gunpoint? Way more than you see a video of a cop shooting a black person without a reason. By some of your reasoning, it's more accurate to 'claim' that black people are all thieves than all cops are racist, especially that they are targeted because of their skin color. Remember, most of you were wrong about what happened in Ferguson. You'd think you would have second thoughts before you condemn someone before all the facts are in. But nope...maybe stupid IS a one-way street.

He's removed. BTW, I saw an idiot on TV saying the cop shouldn't have went after the guy when he ran, so already some want the cops to not even do their jobs. For all anyone knew at that time, the guy could have just killed an entire family.

There's blogs, websites, forums, etc., dedicated solely for the hatred of police. Not just bad police, but all police. It's still very rare that the police do something wrong, but that doesn't fit some people's narrative. It's instant, without thought, blaming the police, even after the real truth comes out. They do not care if they brand someone and they lose their job, respect, or even their family. They want and will cheer on those who goad the police, push every boundary to get them to look bad. Over time, and in many situations, their hands will be tied and innocent people will die

Do you need a permit in Paulding?

I've always found it ironic and a little sad that the liberal peons are expected, and sadly do so, to follow the talking points from the elite liberals, that are protected by armed security, be it elected officials or the Hollywood snobs, that you are not worthy enough to do as they do. They are the adults in the room and they look on you as their little kids without a clue.

I'm in favor of a 'do not respond' list. Sign up in each county where you don't want the police to respond to your home, car or business. Yes, your tax dollars will still fund the police, but we all pay for things we don't use, so don't use that as an excuse. Anti-gun ownership, anti-police, and you liberals are screwed. But, hey you can call Sharpton for help, if you're still breathing. Sharpton will still be breathing as he has his own little brigade of thugs with guns protecting him. Good luck. It's kinda funny how the peon liberals cheer and follow the words of those who have w

http://swedenreport.org/2015/01/06/swedish-police-targeted-by-gangs/ http://www.examiner.com/article/minnesota-officer-shot-police-targeted-when-officer-shot-suspect-custody http://abc11.com/news/durham-police-officer-targeted-by-gunman/451010/

This always happens when one assumes that we, the peons, need to be 'lectured' to understand that our point of view is wrong. This is one of the reasons that I didn't and don't like Obama. Obviously Pubby follows this same tactic. When someone who has no clue what each one of us have dealt with in our lives, 'thinks' they know what we think. It's smug, thoughtless, and condescending. Obama came on the scene with less experience than most of us have, and the lecturing began. Smug and self rightness. I think a big part of the problem with Pubby and some others is that they are disappointed

I honestly feel complete hatred rolling off of our President for me and anyone who disagrees with him, along with many on this forum. I can't say that about any other President since I've been alive.

Maybe the Christians brought in own themselves. Probably refused to bake em a cake or something horrible like that.

I hope the ones that are in favor of forcing one's will upon another will be happy. Just remember that you don't always get what you wish for. Pubby might want to consider to be careful with this forum, not everyone will be served according to their beliefs or wishes. Yes, comments are bad. Threats are good. Hopefully some well-meaning left-leaning thug won't harm them.

Maybe we're pretending that it wasn't because they refused to bake a wedding cake, but refused to cater the wedding, which requires being there. http://www.tmz.com/2015/04/01/memories-pizza-closes-indiana-deny-service-gay-wedding/ Why are people against protecting someone's religion? Why are people condoning threats against people who running their business the way they want to? There are other options for this gay couple other than trying to force what they want against someone else's will. Do you think that it's a right to be able to do that? Or is it a right to be able

You're free to dispute what I posted with facts of your own.

Lawyer? Of course he's against tort reform.

Read all of this: Ten Years of Tort Reform in Texas: A Reviewhttp://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/ten-years-of-tort-reform-in-texas-a-review Way more pluses than minuses.

Should a doctor who (for whatever reason) be forced by the government to do aboortzions? No.

Absolutely. What lower healthcare costs? Absolutely. What less lawyers? Absolutely.

He was targeted because of his color, then asked a question about what the left wanted to believe was a racial incident by a white cop.

This is going to be a even bigger problem with people on the left making up lies to fit their agenda to get votes. Yes, you people on the left have empowered the blacks, just not in a good way.

Glad someone did. http://news.yahoo.com/michelle-obama-declares-black-girls-rock-034851057.html;_ylt=A0LEVj_fEBlVn6oAswsPxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTByZnU4cmNpBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwM5BHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg-- You'd think that 'the powers that be' would get a clue as well, but I guess I was mistaken. How can she and others pick a favorite when they are supposed to represent everyone? Is she the 'first lady' of the U.S. or just a certain color or gender?