feelip Posted July 19, 2010 Report Share Posted July 19, 2010 You mean All my friends know the low rider / The low rider is a little higher / Low rider drives a little slower / Low rider is a real goer / from the 70's?? I saw War in concert for FREE at Piedmont Park, back in the day! MY GOD! How old are you? Link to post Share on other sites
lowrider Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 MY GOD! How old are you? Back at you!! I saw Paul Revere and The Raiders at the Merchandise Mart when I was still in high school........does that help? Link to post Share on other sites
feelip Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Back at you!! I saw Paul Revere and The Raiders at the Merchandise Mart when I was still in high school........does that help? Yep. I thin you are about my sister's age. She saw the Beatles the first time they were in Atlanta but I actually got to see them up close and personal as they left the Municipal Auditorium and got into their limo. I was with my dad who was on governor Sanders' security assignment. I'm not far behind you. 1956 Link to post Share on other sites
lowrider Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Yep. I thin you are about my sister's age. She saw the Beatles the first time they were in Atlanta but I actually got to see them up close and personal as they left the Municipal Auditorium and got into their limo. I was with my dad who was on governor Sanders' security assignment. I'm not far behind you. 1956 That is too cool!! The sixties and seventies were great times! Link to post Share on other sites
treasure Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 So it sounds that Pubby also knows the scoop but for legal reasons cannot reveal the rumor. Animal is giving us a warning. So my question is WHO can reveal this drama and not be penalized by it? Do we just vote against her because we are scared or do we get the TRUTH and be given the opportunity to make our own decision.? Is the devil we know safer than the one we don't?????? Link to post Share on other sites
lowrider Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 I would think most people would already have their mind made up. I VOTED early and I did NOT vote for her. Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 So it sounds that Pubby also knows the scoop but for legal reasons cannot reveal the rumor. Animal is giving us a warning. So my question is WHO can reveal this drama and not be penalized by it? Do we just vote against her because we are scared or do we get the TRUTH and be given the opportunity to make our own decision.? Is the devil we know safer than the one we don't?????? I don't think the rumor is even about HER. It is about someone related to her. I believe it is an election time smear campaign. Link to post Share on other sites
lotstodo Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 So it sounds that Pubby also knows the scoop but for legal reasons cannot reveal the rumor. Animal is giving us a warning. So my question is WHO can reveal this drama and not be penalized by it? Do we just vote against her because we are scared or do we get the TRUTH and be given the opportunity to make our own decision.? Is the devil we know safer than the one we don't?????? There appear to be quite a few reasons to vote one way or another on this candidate without the manufactured drama. This isn't my district, but I can say that my mind was made up about her without any rumors or innuendo. You either like what and who she represents or you don't. This was probably the easiest decision to make. Link to post Share on other sites
feelip Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 There appear to be quite a few reasons to vote one way or another on this candidate without the manufactured drama. This isn't my district, but I can say that my mind was made up about her without any rumors or innuendo. You either like what and who she represents or you don't. This was probably the easiest decision to make. I agree. There is only one choice in that race that makes sense and it is Todd Pownall. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
mountainman44 Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) I agree. There is only one choice in that race that makes sense and it is Todd Pownall. WRONG AGAIN! THERE IS ANOTHER. Edited July 20, 2010 by mountainman44 1 Link to post Share on other sites
mojo413 Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 I don't think the rumor is even about HER. It is about someone related to her. I believe it is an election time smear campaign. Mrs. Cochran could put an end to all the guessing if she so desired. I have been watching Paulding.com, Facebook and her website and I cannot find even a hint from her. With as much smoke as is circulating it seems she would want to set the record straight on the eve of the election. If this were an election time smear campaign it would seem to me her team would be telling her to put the rumors to bed with the truth. If it were me I would be using every available media to set the record straight, unless I wanted the truth buried for a few hours. Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Mrs. Cochran could put an end to all the guessing if she so desired. I have been watching Paulding.com, Facebook and her website and I cannot find even a hint from her. With as much smoke as is circulating it seems she would want to set the record straight on the eve of the election. If this were an election time smear campaign it would seem to me her team would be telling her to put the rumors to bed with the truth. If it were me I would be using every available media to set the record straight, unless I wanted the truth buried for a few hours. You are kidding, right? Why should she even notice it. It is not a charge after all, it is an unsubstantiated rumor. Link to post Share on other sites
mojo413 Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 You are kidding, right? Why should she even notice it. It is not a charge after all, it is an unsubstantiated rumor. Unsubstantiated rumor or outright lie? If it were about me, a friend or family member I would be setting the record straight. Link to post Share on other sites
treasure Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Unsubstantiated rumor or outright lie? If it were about me, a friend or family member I would be setting the record straight. EXACTLY, especially before an election. Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Unsubstantiated rumor or outright lie? If it were about me, a friend or family member I would be setting the record straight. Nothing to set straight. Anybody can say anything they want to and the one being talked about is not required to respond. If there is a charge I am 100% sure the person making it will hear from her. Link to post Share on other sites
mojo413 Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 You are kidding, right? Why should she even notice it. It is not a charge after all, it is an unsubstantiated rumor. Is the unsubstantiated rumor (you refer to) an outright lie? Seems like it is a question that deserves a "yes" or "no" answer. Link to post Share on other sites
dawneykids Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) So what the heck is she SUPPOSED to have done? You come on here begging family and friends to make her drop out of the race and say ignorant things like 'May God have Mercy on her soul' and you expect us to blindly listen to you and your rumor mongering. You're kidding, right? This is one of the stupidest topics that has ever been allowed to stay on this board. Edited July 20, 2010 by momof 3 Link to post Share on other sites
treasure Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) Read this carefully............. I KNOW you cannot tell us WHAT the allegation is that should keep us from voting for Her. But, hypothetically, say I was running for this posistion,what type of allegation placed against ME would keep you from voting for ME??? (this should keep a libal suit from being placed against anyone....hypothetically.) Edited July 20, 2010 by treasure Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Read this carefully............. I KNOW you cannot tell us WHAT the allegation is that should keep us from voting for Her. But, hypothetically, say I was running for this posistion,what type of allegation placed against ME would keep you from voting for ME??? (this should keep a libal suit from being placed against anyone....hypothetically.) If it keeps someone from voting for her then I doubt seriously they intended to in the first place. This kind of underhanded stuff just makes me look at the candidate a second time and consider them when I have already passed them over. Link to post Share on other sites
Animal Posted July 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Look say that a close family member for example gave you this terrible information,now this person is real close to Beverly. Now this person won't go on the record. And I was not looking for this at all. Now it was good enough insider information that the GBI is investigating it. Now what to do,you keep receiving very detailed information from this family member,who says there fed up and know that she was very much in the know and still chose to run for office,hoping that none would come out till after the race. Smear job not hardly,the truth on hold & the hostage of the people that deserve to know. Link to post Share on other sites
Cabe Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 What are you saying, animal? That if Mrs. Cochran quietly steps down the mysterious allegations against a family member may just go away? The allusion so far has been that Cochran herself has done nothing wrong. Why should she step down? Paulding County won't recover soon from the Stout fiasco unless he is defeated tomorrow, how could Cochran bring shame on the Paulding Republican Party? I'm still waiting on an answer to this post from page 1. Link to post Share on other sites
Animal Posted July 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Because when this comes out it will make Mr.Stout look like a walk in the park. His was old,Her's is recent and the bad part is all the people that know about it and kept it under wraps there just as guilty. Link to post Share on other sites
Purple Rider Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 First and foremost, this topic should never have been started! It reeks of being a mere rumor. I don't know Ms. Cochran personally but I do know that even family members get mad at each other and say things they shouldn't out of anger or even jealousy. Ms. Cochran may not feel that this is even worth responding to! People need to vote based on their own ideals, not someone else's! Now get out there and vote people! Have a great day! Link to post Share on other sites
dawneykids Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 First and foremost, this topic should never have been started! It reeks of being a mere rumor. I don't know Ms. Cochran personally but I do know that even family members get mad at each other and say things they shouldn't out of anger or even jealousy. Ms. Cochran may not feel that this is even worth responding to! People need to vote based on their own ideals, not someone else's! Now get out there and vote people! Have a great day! Right on the mark!!! This has happened in my own family, people spouting garbage because it somehow makes them look better like they are in 'the know'. There is absolutely no credibility here and I think the topic should have been closed a long time ago. Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Look say that a close family member for example gave you this terrible information,now this person is real close to Beverly. Now this person won't go on the record. And I was not looking for this at all. Now it was good enough insider information that the GBI is investigating it. Now what to do,you keep receiving very detailed information from this family member,who says there fed up and know that she was very much in the know and still chose to run for office,hoping that none would come out till after the race. Smear job not hardly,the truth on hold & the hostage of the people that deserve to know. All complaints at election time would be investigated by the proper authorities. Even if they prove to be false. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts