Dreamwriter Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Praise thee I can assure you that surepip is no liberal, And has voted Republican more times,Than you can imagine, And is still supporting and voting for many Republicans today. Your false claims does nothing to further the Paulding County Republican Party. Just because surepip is not supporting Beverly Cochran this does not make him a liberal, As you claim. As far as Surepip being vindictive,I THINK ???? not sure, That you know what the open records request is going to reveal, I hope that you and all others look at this information with a open mind Leave the GOP out of it as I speak on my own. I doubt any records is going to change anyone's mind about Beverly as she was not an elected official, could not make decisions, and did her job as she was hired to do, and broke no laws. Surepip has a vendetta against Jerry and that is what he is doing to further his cause and use this site to promote his vindiction. I don't care which party he votes for but his attitude is liberal plain and simple. His business with the county should be in the courts; not him coming on here and trashing anyone he pleases so he can get his jollies by doing so just because she was his assistant. It is dirty and smells bad and it is a shame that some cannot hold themselves back by doing so "because" they can on this site without being warned. It is pitiful to be honest. People want to know where she and other stand on issues by meeting them; not hearing twisted facts to suit ones agenda on this site. And having someone whose main mission is too trash anyone he deems, in his opinion, to not be worthy of any elected office, even when he doesn't live in Post 2 and expect others to believe every word he says. Link to post Share on other sites
D-Dawg Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Excuse me? Rabid Dog when I did not get my way ? I offered to sit down and negotiate. David and I had a nice meeting at the time, and since. David let me know three members of the BOC chose NOT to sit down and negotiate until the Judge rules on the primary motion now at hand. OK with us. We offered to let the county off for far less than the dollars in the suit. Instead, from that point forward, we let it stand. WE can say we offered. They chose not to even give it a shot. I have not turned on David Austin at all. I saw and spoke with him last week as well. Where do you get your misinformation from ? Where do you get off saying I have turned on him ? Excuse me again???????? You and your bureau of misinformation appear to be working overtime. I will be picking up my open records request information tomorrow concerning Beverly, and will scan them and post to p.com as soon as possible. I will be awaiting for an apology from you in the interim, although I highly doubt I will see one. Like some of your cohorts.....you are not always right, but are NEVER wrong. Rabid Dog? Are you on meds? You have been bad mouthing David and the rest of the BOC since he took office! Make up your mind please! It's been a constant thing with you to come in here with the rants just about every week! Are you off your meds? WTH do I need to apologize for? I'm not the one who's been making the accusations without any proof! You going to apologize if you do not find your smoking gun? I doubt it. The witch hunt will continue for ever! Link to post Share on other sites
WHITEY Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 You have been bad mouthing David and the rest of the BOC since he took office! Make up your mind please! It's been a constant thing with you to come in here with the rants just about every week! Are you off your meds? WTH do I need to apologize for? I'm not the one who's been making the accusations without any proof! You going to apologize if you do not find your smoking gun? I doubt it. The witch hunt will continue for ever! Just be still for a little while and listen,Your proof is coming Link to post Share on other sites
surepip Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 You have been bad mouthing David and the rest of the BOC since he took office! Make up your mind please! It's been a constant thing with you to come in here with the rants just about every week! Are you off your meds? WTH do I need to apologize for? I'm not the one who's been making the accusations without any proof! You going to apologize if you do not find your smoking gun? I doubt it. The witch hunt will continue for ever! Please show me where I have ever badmouthed David Austin ? And you are more that welcome to apologize after your search for any such thing. I am afraid you have been hallucinating and inventing such things. I anxiously await your reply. Link to post Share on other sites
mevans_70 Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Do I sense a definite agenda here? LOL As I asked before - this topic is "Commissioner Candidates". Anyone choose to discuss the 4 candidates running in post 4 and the 2 candidates running in post 2? Those posts make up 2 vote on the board. Beverly is 1 vote on the board. The 3 combined could make decisions - depending on how the voters vote. 3 of 5 is a majority. We still have 2 "good ol boys" in office now - Larry and David. Things that make you go hmmm? Just a repost of my comments. Again - there are 3 races here. Anyone care to discuss ALL OF THEM? Any thoughts on candidates whot are getting support from the current commissioners because of promises they made to each other before previous elections? Seems like a good ol boy network there. Scratch my back and I'll scratch yours. At least some people will go work from nothing to try to do this. I'm very respectful of those candidates. Go Beverly, Go Jason, Go Vernon! Link to post Share on other sites
D-Dawg Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Just be still for a little while and listen,Your proof is coming So, are yall going to do the same for each and every candidate? Link to post Share on other sites
D-Dawg Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Please show me where I have ever badmouthed David Austin ? And you are more that welcome to apologize after your search for any such thing. I am afraid you have been hallucinating and inventing such things. I anxiously await your reply. lol, you so funny! It would blow up the search feature for these forums because it would get so much crap back! Better question, when did you say anything good about the BOC? Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyJ Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 lol, you so funny! It would blow up the search feature for these forums because it would get so much crap back! Better question, when did you say anything good about the BOC? The search function works just fine. YOU might want to try it...just saying. BTW: You can set it to find posts where David Austin is mentioned by Surepip, I did. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Beach Bum Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 The search function works just fine. YOU might want to try it...just saying. BTW: You can set it to find posts where David Austin is mentioned by Surepip, I did. I know for a fact that Winchester is a very intelligent, informed guy so, it could just be that Winchester doesn't choose to spend as much time here as "some"; therefore he obviously wouldn't be aware of all the "technical" functions of p.com - I think he has a pretty full, satisfying life and doesn't feel the need or choose to spend most of his waking hours on p.com. Just sayin..... Link to post Share on other sites
surepip Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Just a repost of my comments. Again - there are 3 races here. Anyone care to discuss ALL OF THEM? Any thoughts on candidates whot are getting support from the current commissioners because of promises they made to each other before previous elections? Seems like a good ol boy network there. Scratch my back and I'll scratch yours. At least some people will go work from nothing to try to do this. I'm very respectful of those candidates. Go Beverly, Go Jason, Go Vernon! Absolutely! I think Tommie Graham has done a magnificent job on the BOC. He comes to the meetings prepared, knowledgeable, and asks questions which cut to the chase. His financial background has definitely been an asset to the entire BOC. He appears to be very active within all sectors of the county including working with those not in his Post. I don't see how anyone who has watched any of the BOC meetings cannot be impressed with Tommie and I sincerely hope the voters of Post 3 return him to his Commission. He has definitely been a refreshing breathe of fresh air on the BOC and has stepped up to the job. Right now I would have to throw my support for David Barnett for Post 4, but then again I personally know David and I do not know the others. David is a successful businessman and has managed to survive the downturn locally. I have heard, but have yet to confirm that old King Jerry is supporting Anavitarte so I would be cautious with that one. Much like Post 2, if you want King Jerry's influence back on the BOC, then by all means vote that way. As many have stated, I have a vendetta for the Ex-Chairman and would be happy for him to retire to his Florida castle and leave Paulding behind. And needless to say, I feel Todd Pownall would be an asset to the BOC. I have known Todd for 10-12 years now primarily through his work with the Relay for Life program. In addition, he displayed his courage to take on the Good 'Ol Boys when he stood down King Jerry 2 years ago slamming the lid on the cookie jar while King Jerry's hand was in it for all to see. And kept his cool in the process. I know what Todd supports and I feel he would make a good open commissioner who will watch out for the citizens of Paulding. Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Do I sense a definite agenda here? LOL As I asked before - this topic is "Commissioner Candidates". Anyone choose to discuss the 4 candidates running in post 4 and the 2 candidates running in post 2? Those posts make up 2 vote on the board. Beverly is 1 vote on the board. The 3 combined could make decisions - depending on how the voters vote. 3 of 5 is a majority. We still have 2 "good ol boys" in office now - Larry and David. Things that make you go hmmm? I'd like to know how long you have to be on the BOC before you become one of the "Good ole Boys"? David is a "Good ole Boy"? Did that happen while I wasn't looking? Link to post Share on other sites
surepip Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I'd like to know how long you have to be on the BOC before you become one of the "Good ole Boys"? David is a "Good ole Boy"? Did that happen while I wasn't looking? No, that is MEvans opinion. David and Tommie I would say stand alone and will work to do the right thing. Don "waffles" back and forth. There are some issues I thought he would pick up the ball and run with, and he chose not to. But then again, for many years he was out there all by himself against the other 4, then 3 commissioners. Larry and Wayne are your current Good 'Ol Boys and Larry stands the chance of sitting all out there by himself depending on how the elections turn out. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyJ Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I know for a fact that Winchester is a very intelligent, informed guy so, it could just be that Winchester doesn't choose to spend as much time here as "some"; therefore he obviously wouldn't be aware of all the "technical" functions of p.com - I think he has a pretty full, satisfying life and doesn't feel the need or choose to spend most of his waking hours on p.com. Just sayin..... Are we talking about the same poster? Maybe I need to use your glasses to see more clearly. Just saying...anyone can use the search function. Link to post Share on other sites
TwoKidCircus Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Great post! I haven't been on this board long but long enough to know that surepip does use this site, unjustly, to further his cause. What makes it bad is that most will people what he spews without looking at the other side which we can't hear. Leave the GOP out of it as I speak on my own. I doubt any records is going to change anyone's mind about Beverly as she was not an elected official, could not make decisions, and did her job as she was hired to do, and broke no laws. Surepip has a vendetta against Jerry and that is what he is doing to further his cause and use this site to promote his vindiction. I don't care which party he votes for but his attitude is liberal plain and simple. His business with the county should be in the courts; not him coming on here and trashing anyone he pleases so he can get his jollies by doing so just because she was his assistant. It is dirty and smells bad and it is a shame that some cannot hold themselves back by doing so "because" they can on this site without being warned. It is pitiful to be honest. People want to know where she and other stand on issues by meeting them; not hearing twisted facts to suit ones agenda on this site. And having someone whose main mission is too trash anyone he deems, in his opinion, to not be worthy of any elected office, even when he doesn't live in Post 2 and expect others to believe every word he says. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
mrshoward Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 It should be painfully obvious why no candidate in their right mind would subject themselves to this muddy pit of malice, smears, and rumors... :rolleyes: 4 Link to post Share on other sites
feelip Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Winchester. Do you happen to be a banker? Link to post Share on other sites
Beach Bum Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Great post! I haven't been on this board long but long enough to know that surepip does use this site, unjustly, to further his cause. What makes it bad is that most will people what he spews without looking at the other side which we can't hear. Link to post Share on other sites
BikerDave Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 What the heck does Shearin have to do with this election? NOTHING! He's not running, nor is he supporting anyone who is running that I know of. Get over it! He's gone! If I were to support Beverly Cochran it's ONLY because I know she can do the job needed! I have personally known her for more the 15 years, she's been to my house and we have talked many times. We have worked together on community projects, many community projects over the years. She is a good friend! But I don't let friendship decide who I vote for, never have. It's all about who I feel can do the job the best! I will make my decision based on the merits on hand at that time! I don't care who they worked for as an employee, I don't care who they are related to or did business with either! ALL I care about is who I THINK can do the best job for that position! I damn sure not going to listen to a bunch of grumpy old farts with an agenda! You should listen to them because they are in the "know" and they back their statements with facts! Jerry and his crooks and thieves are something we have had too much of in this county. Property taxes are higher here in Paulding than they are in Cobb because of run away spending. I am very thankful for people of caliber like Todd Pownall who stood up to them and questioned their back door tactics. Link to post Share on other sites
BikerDave Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Great post! I haven't been on this board long but long enough to know that surepip does use this site, unjustly, to further his cause. What makes it bad is that most will people what he spews without looking at the other side which we can't hear. Well you said it , you have not been here long, surepip posts good information and has no "agenda" he is simply fed up with dishonest officials who waste our tax money and make poor decisions for our county. Link to post Share on other sites
Beach Bum Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 You should listen to them because they are in the "know" and they back their statements with facts! Jerry and his crooks and thieves are something we have had too much of in this county. Property taxes are higher here in Paulding than they are in Cobb because of run away spending. I am very thankful for people of caliber like Todd Pownall who stood up to them and questioned their back door tactics. You certainly have a right to your opinion as everyone does; however, I believe you will find many, many people that do not agree with you on the bolded section above. Link to post Share on other sites
BikerDave Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 You certainly have a right to your opinion as everyone does; however, I believe you will find many, many people that do not agree with you on the bolded section above. I bet that you have an Obama sticker on your vehicle, how do you like the"change" as our country is being flushed down the toilet with liberalism and socialism and no personal accountability. I bet you think illegal immigration is ok too. You don't see Obama stickers on the cars of people who are going to WORK. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
mrshoward Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I bet that you have an Obama sticker on your vehicle, how do you like the"change" as our country is being flushed down the toilet with liberalism and socialism and no personal accountability. I bet you think illegal immigration is ok too. You don't see Obama stickers on the cars of people who are going to WORK. And you have the nerve to call other folks uninformed... :lol: Link to post Share on other sites
BikerDave Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 And you have the nerve to call other folks uninformed... :lol: Yep Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I bet that you have an Obama sticker on your vehicle, how do you like the"change" as our country is being flushed down the toilet with liberalism and socialism and no personal accountability. I bet you think illegal immigration is ok too. You don't see Obama stickers on the cars of people who are going to WORK. You really don't know BB very well!! You are so far off base it is not even funny!!! Link to post Share on other sites
TwoKidCircus Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I see it differently. I believe he has an axe to grind and doesn't mind trashing innocent people in the process. Well you said it , you have not been here long, surepip posts good information and has no "agenda" he is simply fed up with dishonest officials who waste our tax money and make poor decisions for our county. Link to post Share on other sites
Cabe Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I bet that you have an Obama sticker on your vehicle, how do you like the"change" as our country is being flushed down the toilet with liberalism and socialism and no personal accountability. I bet you think illegal immigration is ok too. You don't see Obama stickers on the cars of people who are going to WORK. If that weren't so outright ignorant, it would be incredibly funny. Link to post Share on other sites
Beach Bum Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I bet that you have an Obama sticker on your vehicle, how do you like the"change" as our country is being flushed down the toilet with liberalism and socialism and no personal accountability. I bet you think illegal immigration is ok too. You don't see Obama stickers on the cars of people who are going to WORK. You know this is exactly why people shouldn't get on public message forums and talk about something or someone that you have not a clue about - could make you look a little foolish and not very credible. On a lighter note, did I die and come back reincarnated as a Democrat? If so, the world really is coming to an end! Link to post Share on other sites
shannonsolomon Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I see it differently. I believe he has an axe to grind and doesn't mind trashing innocent people in the process. But, how do you know they're innocent? Link to post Share on other sites
TwoKidCircus Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 (edited) Innocent until proven guilty or should I just believe surepip's claims as true? What if he is the one speaking mistruths? I do not believe Beverly Cochran to be a Shearin stooge. If anyone would take the time to actually speak with her, you would know this. But, how do you know they're innocent? Edited May 26, 2010 by TwoKidCircus Link to post Share on other sites
AcworthDad Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 You know this is exactly why people shouldn't get on public message forums and talk about something or someone that you have not a clue about - could make you look a little foolish and not very credible. On a lighter note, did I die and come back reincarnated as a Democrat? If so, the world really is coming to an end! :rofl: Remember, friends don't let friends vote Democrat! Link to post Share on other sites
Beach Bum Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 But, how do you know they're innocent? Well you know that little "presumption of innocence" thing.......innocent until proven guilty - as far as I know, none of them have been charged with anything, much less convicted of anything. Remember, friends don't let friends vote Democrat! Yep - you are right my friend! Link to post Share on other sites
shannonsolomon Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Innocent until proven guilty or should I just believe surepip's claims as true? What if he is the one speaking mistruths? I do not believe Beverly Cochran to be a Shearin stooge. If anyone would take the time to actually speak with her, you would know this. But what if he's not? Shouldn't he be innocent until proven guilty, too? Link to post Share on other sites
NewsJunky Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Remember, friends don't let friends vote Democrat! That is the truth!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
D-Dawg Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Are we talking about the same poster? Maybe I need to use your glasses to see more clearly. Just saying...anyone can use the search function. JJ I can assure you I know how the search feature works, I choose not to waste my time. In fact, I do not have the time available to waste on such BS. I'm fully aware of how this site works, been using this site a very long time. I was here when it was just a BBS. Winchester. Do you happen to be a banker? Nope! But I did stay at a Holiday Inn one night! Link to post Share on other sites
D-Dawg Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 You should listen to them because they are in the "know" and they back their statements with facts! Jerry and his crooks and thieves are something we have had too much of in this county. Property taxes are higher here in Paulding than they are in Cobb because of run away spending. I am very thankful for people of caliber like Todd Pownall who stood up to them and questioned their back door tactics. Maybe YOU should listen those who do not have an agenda or an ax to grind against prior administrations. But PLEASE show me where they have backed up anything they have said? Please! Because when I ask them to, they run and hide or just ignore it. Link to post Share on other sites
D-Dawg Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Remember, friends don't let friends vote Democrat! Now that was funny! But what if he's not? Shouldn't he be innocent until proven guilty, too? We haven't accused him of anything other then making accusations without any type of proof! He is the one accusing people of doing things. Link to post Share on other sites
WHITEY Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Maybe YOU should listen those who do not have an agenda or an ax to grind against prior administrations. But PLEASE show me where they have backed up anything they have said? Please! Because when I ask them to, they run and hide or just ignore it. well..... I can tell you one thing that was certaintly backed up When all of the naysayers were on this site last election supporting the likes of JS, And the mysterious link to a web site popped up here on P.com that had all the previous allegations posted as proof postive of his actions, Most of ya''ll scurried like a bunch of rats looking for a hole to run into. And just who is running in this election, that is tied directly to the King????????? Nope I can not support anyone that is tied into that adminstration, Sorry Link to post Share on other sites
Beach Bum Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 well..... I can tell you one thing that was certaintly backed up When all of the naysayers were on this site last election supporting the likes of JS, And the mysterious link to a web site popped up here on P.com that had all the previous allegations posted as proof postive of his actions, Most of ya''ll scurried like a bunch of rats looking for a hole to run into. And just who is running in this election, that is tied directly to the King????????? Nope I can not support anyone that is tied into that adminstration, Sorry What website are you referring to? Specifically what allegations are you referring to? Were these allegations dropped if there was an investigation done? Was Shearin or anyone from his administration charged with a crime (and I am not speaking of campaign contributions). Link to post Share on other sites
Dreamwriter Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 (edited) well..... I can tell you one thing that was certaintly backed up When all of the naysayers were on this site last election supporting the likes of JS, And the mysterious link to a web site popped up here on P.com that had all the previous allegations posted as proof postive of his actions, Most of ya''ll scurried like a bunch of rats looking for a hole to run into. And just who is running in this election, that is tied directly to the King????????? Nope I can not support anyone that is tied into that adminstration, Sorry I ran no where and that site proved nothing, really. It was nothing more than a smear campaign. Edited May 26, 2010 by PraiseThee Link to post Share on other sites
WHITEY Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I ran no where and that site proved nothing, really. It was nothing more than a smear campaign. nope it was a proof campaign, and P.com provided the avenue to provide the proof. Just think if P.com had been used to it's fullest extent on Mr. Stout in the early part of the campaign, What the results would have been Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now