Eddie Bennett

Yeah, well you know, South carolina was where the first shots of the Civil War were fired, back on January 9, 1861! I don't suppose the first shots have been fired for WW3, as yet. But, maybe they have, G D! There are a lot of people who seem to be wanting every one of these type shootings to be the first shots fired, for a war.

Thanks, Ivy! When times are critical, family is valuable.

Most Germans know that they need these people to help their country. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/booming-germany-needs-workers-as-rest-of-europe-struggles-1.1380545 I would think that some sort of device that would helps there immigrants translate their language to German, would be worth it's weight in gold.

You were wrong, captio? Oh Hell No! How did that ever happen?

Despite push-back from his colleagues, LAPD Police Chief, Charlie Beck has recommended that Officer Clifford Proctor be charged for shooting and killing an unarmed homeless man in Los Angeles ... https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=16&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiS-aeRtaXKAhUJOT4KHXmiCyE4ChAWCDwwBQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2Fjustice%2F2016%2F01%2F11%2F3738028%2Fla-police-chief-wants-officer-charged-for-killing-unarmed-homeless-man%2F&usg=AFQjCNFDuDuigl-3UR1LHOWKR2wnzFYPyw&sig2=zbDtWp5uKFGuPe8b8COOig

I think G D actually knows how the words of fear, associated with a whole group of people, are spread. We had a discussion about the South Carolina killer, who murdered 9 Church members, and later said he did it in the name of a whole group of his kind of believers. Well, I didn't hear him standing up for the Judging of the killer, in that case. If I remember correctly, he agreed that it was the killer's own choice, and had nothing to do with the rest of the Confederate sympathisers.

Kangaroo courts operate on the bases of privacy, D V b P, not Public Transparency.

Okay, I did, GD! "How dare you take the sympathy away from the victim -- Officer Hartnett -- and the men and women in blue under siege every day by the haters and turn it into sympathy and understanding for a different group?" Now, if the Judge had not said "group" right at the end of her "how dare you" statement, and had said "turn it into understanding for this killer," she would not have been generalizing the whole Muslim group. The Mayor was talking about the group, and not the killer that the Judge was referring too.

I don't care If it snow's knee deep to Svetlana Pankratova, I'll love it. I'd get right up on top.

Like I asked GD, Shananigans! People are not victims of G D's family, just because a few of his family members flies a plains into the World trade center. If G D was in that group of murders, and had taken action on their part, then YES, G D would be a guilty killer. too.

They man was a terrorists and he did in in the name of who ever he said he did it for. If one of your relatives, GD, goes out and kills a cop in your family name, Are you guilty of the murder, also?

This socalled Judge, is as stupid as the people who said the man, who killed 9 people in a South Carolina Church, did it in the name of the Confederacy. He was just a stupid man, who believed he was doing something good for the Confederacy,

I left work, early, against advice from my employer.

"How dare you take the sympathy away from the victim -- Officer Hartnett -- and the men and women in blue under siege every day by the haters and turn it into sympathy and understanding for a different group?" That SOB wasn't a group, Gard Dad!

"If You Kill in the Name of Islam, You're an Islamic Terrorist" But, a person who blames the whole population for what one man does is a stupid person. Click Here: http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/01/10/judge-jeanine-philly-mayor-jim-kenney-stop-mouthing-when-you-dont-know-facts

I had been married for a year, and had to stay home with my wife. I remember that SO WELL, juleebella!

I understand, jenilyn! I feel the same way, until I think how happy I am that I burn firewood, and I still have about three cords, in the wood pile, seasoned, and ready to burn. Check Out my First Cousin, Shane Hughes! He may be related to Pubby on his fathers side; I don't know! Click Here: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1666027340335175&set=pcb.1666027377001838&type=3

Ben Colder's Doo Hicky Song.

We have at least two family reunions a year. I know most of the family, but there are a few weddings I didn't attend, and a few boyfriends and girlfriends that I don't know. But, I know which of my family members brings the food, and which of them puts money in the plate for flower funds. I also know, believe it or not, which of my family members bring nothing. and pay nothing. Is it bad for me to understand all this information about my family?

It is my Niece's mother, who is my Sister, who had the stroke, Ivy! I actually used my Niece's photo to brighten up the subject matter of this post. My Sister used to be as beautiful as my Niece is now, but my Sister is only 3 years younger than myself, which makes her 68 years old. I guess I worded things a little wrong. But, I think i did try to explain which of my relatives had the stroke. I just did it the wrong way. I think people just don't much like my real subject matter. I was very strongly trying to say that if a person is not willing to learn, nobody can help them. But, if

Exactly, Blondie! Keeping on doing what we always do, and expecting different results is exactly what's happening. When all the money finely gets into the hands of the 1%, we get to start over, because the Monopoly game will be over. Money will only be handy to a few individuals, and everybody else will have it get into survival mode. I suppose what money is left will buy thugs to do some killing of poachers, and home stead hunters. In any event the multi billionaires will wind up trillionaires. Maybe a King will come out of it.

This seems to me to be like politics without principal. I have been trying to understand how either subject matter can be discussed without the other. Exactly how can we discuss matters of principle without including matters of politics? Which subject matter out weighs the other, in terms of how to weigh a discussion for whether it needs censoring, or killed all together? Would not wealth without work, pleasure without conscience, science without humanity, knowledge without character, commerce without morality, and worship without sacrifice, be about the same thing? What say you,

Thanks! No. it's just an internet pic, satellite! A person as dumb as I am, has to get their information from somewhere, and I heard that if it's on the internet, it's true!

Let me brighten this post up a little. I have a Niece, in Corpus Christie, TX, whome I love. She is way more popular with children than she is adults. She is an artist, and uses her talent to make children happy. Her face paintings are adored by a lot of Texas children. The point I'm making is that she looks so much like my sister, because she is beautiful, TO ME, too. She has suffered a stroke, and is in a care facility, in Sugarland Texas. Although my sister's, and my niece's beauty shows like a light in the sky, they are beautiful in so many other ways, TO ME, First of all, the same