FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 report of 10-67 on Buchanan Path (numerics withheld) - occured last date - suspect just left on foot. white male, black hair, glasses, 5-7, skinny - heading towards Silver commet trail in area of 278. SO149, 136, 71 and other units enroute officers asking for clothing description officers report heavy static on radios (I concur) Link to post Share on other sites
gwilli8866 Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 If this is truly a 10-67 I hope they get him and put him away. Link to post Share on other sites
yodiggity Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 whats 10-67? Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 137 out at SCT and 278 10-67 - rape Link to post Share on other sites
MamaJess Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 10-67 = rape Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 157 on scene at Buchanan Path I'm trying to protect the identity of the woman - but let others know the status of the suspect. Link to post Share on other sites
MamaJess Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 That isn't too far from me... Link to post Share on other sites
moxie37 Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 report of 10-67 on Buchanan Path (numerics withheld) - occured last date - suspect just left on foot. white male, black hair, glasses, 5-7, skinny - heading towards Silver commet trail in area of 278. SO149, 136, 71 and other units enroute officers asking for clothing description officers report heavy static on radios (I concur) DOES ANYONE KNOW WHERE BUCHANAN PATH IS? Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 I hope they have caught him already, and I hope she is okay. Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 map of area: http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?searc...ga&zipcode= 120 at SCT/Cole Lake Rd Link to post Share on other sites
yodiggity Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 oh man. I hope they catch that loser. Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 http://maps.google.com/maps?tab=wl Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 http://www.georgia-sex-offenders.com/maps/offenders.php Search the area for names. Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 http://services.georgia.gov/gbi/gbisor/Sex...derId=281243AB7 Fits description. ??? Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 157 and 149 just went in service - without any stat codes Didn't hear anything further on subject Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 double post - site extremely slow today Link to post Share on other sites
Artofbrandond Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Remember, that all it takes in an accusation to have someone arrested and most likely convicted of a charge like this. Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Remember, that all it takes in an accusation to have someone arrested and most likely convicted of a charge like this. It takes A LOT more than an accusation to get a conviction. If it is rape, the physical evidence will be there since it just happened. Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Suspect's name is give, but I do not see it on the sex offender's website Link to post Share on other sites
Artofbrandond Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 It takes A LOT more than an accusation to get a conviction. If it is rape, the physical evidence will be there since it just happened. pffffft...there have been numerous cases in which people have been convicted of rape with the DNA evidence disproving it. Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 unit on SCT has subject in custody - awaiting pickup from unit in auto Link to post Share on other sites
frontporchmom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Thanks for the update FreeBird Link to post Share on other sites
lilgallowsmama Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 unit on SCT has subject in custody - awaiting pickup from unit in auto YAY!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
twinmom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 (edited) pffffft...there have been numerous cases in which people have been convicted of rape with the DNA evidence disproving it. there have also been innocent people that served time and are on the registry because an idiot attorney told them it was word against word and hard to prove either way so just take the plea bargain it will be over faster than a trial. Except ooopps...you just lost 2 years of your life in the county jail and being on the "list" is a much bigger deal than the attorney told you. (yes this happened to a distant relative of mine because of a ticked off step daughter) edit to add.....but there are alot of psychos (not offense psychomom) out there that are convicted by evidence and should have their @#$%$% cut off with a dull knife. Edited September 14, 2007 by american pie Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 SO 71 (SCT unit) in service Link to post Share on other sites
twinmom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Excuse my brain freeze today...but, what does "happened last date mean" wouldn't that mean yesterday? Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 last date = yesterday that is law enforcment speak Link to post Share on other sites
dagadawgs Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Yesterday, a PCSO came through my neighborhood and asked my mother-in-law if she had seen a young white male that he described as skinny and about 5'8. She asked her to be on the look out for him and call if he was spotted again. I live over near here off of Paul Aiken Link to post Share on other sites
twinmom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 last date = yesterday that is law enforcment speak that is what I assumed, but wanted to clarify before I asked this question.... It happened yesterday, but he just left this morning? Was he holding her hostage? Link to post Share on other sites
michelay1000 Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 there have also been innocent people that served time and are on the registry because an idiot attorney told them it was word against word and hard to prove either way so just take the plea bargain it will be over faster than a trial. Except ooopps...you just lost 2 years of your life in the county jail and being on the "list" is a much bigger deal than the attorney told you. (yes this happened to a distant relative of mine because of a ticked off step daughter) edit to add.....but there are alot of psychos (not offense psychomom) out there that are convicted by evidence and should have their @#$%$% cut off with a dull knife. I agree with your post 100%. Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 the initial dispatch said the 10-67 occured yesterday and the suspect had just left the residence as the call for help was dispatched. Link to post Share on other sites
twinmom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 Yesterday, a PCSO came through my neighborhood and asked my mother-in-law if she had seen a young white male that he described as skinny and about 5'8. She asked her to be on the look out for him and call if he was spotted again. I live over near here off of Paul AikenTerrific..if you go through the woods I live about a block from you.....PCSO was cruising our s/d this morning about 9.the initial dispatch said the 10-67 occured yesterday and the suspect had just left the residence as the call for help was dispatched.That's what I am saying..if it happened yesterday why was he leaving this morning. Even if it happened at midnight..the call came in at 9 something this morning...that's 9 hours.I guess it is possible that he was a family member that lives in the same house. Link to post Share on other sites
FreeBird Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 I don't know further details - I would say that it is probably not a hostage situation. Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 I am standing by what I stated. If this just occured, then physical evidence should be there. That is where the conviction would come from. And a WHOLE lot less people get convicted for crimes they did not commit than 20 years ago. DNA changed the rules. So, those who are being proven now to be innocent are not the same cases. And in those, the woman WAS raped, they had the wrong identification. As for the plea bargain, won't get into it now. Just hope this woman is okay. Link to post Share on other sites
michelay1000 Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 If this just occured, then physical evidence should be there. That is where the conviction would come from. And a WHOLE lot less people get convicted for crimes they did not commit than 20 years ago. DNA changed the rules. And I am glad it did. Link to post Share on other sites
Artofbrandond Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 And I am glad it did. You can still convict with DNA Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 You can still convict with DNA Yeah. But it is a lot harder to convict WITHOUT DNA now. Link to post Share on other sites
michelay1000 Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 You can still convict with DNA I know you can, but you can also cut down on false arrests. Link to post Share on other sites
Artofbrandond Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 I know you can, but you can also cut down on false arrests. I'm saying the courts can find someone guilty even if DNA argues otherwise. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now