Foxmeister

You gave yourself away a long time ago and it was on FB that you did it. All your questions were answered a long time ago. Go back and search for them and you will find them. You're a damn hypocrite. You demand people to justify a position, but yet you often avoid giving a position; and when you do, you don't give a justification for it. I'm not the only one who sees that about you.

Projection and deflection are two things you do here all the time. I gave my position and it's just too damn bad for you if you don't agree with it. BTW I noticed on your FB page you posted, "I believe in the Great Commission and treating others the way I want to be treated, not in the way they treat me," on March 10 of this year. Were you being hypocritical or do you really want to be treated as badly as you treat those who disagree with you?

Are we not a group of people having a discussion where several are of different opinions? Of course you knew that already to be true. Your narcissism causes you to be insulting to others in order for you to feel superior. You're not superior, but a fool.

I'm suggesting no such thing and you know what I said is a common statement in any group discussion. You're just showing how much of an ass you really are.

By "us" I mean everyone participating in this discussion, but you already knew that. There are liberals who have no idea between a clip and a magazine. There are liberals such as yourself, who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.

I don't see a problem with training and arming selected teachers. Now tell us how you would protect those in our schools.

Police officers do not receive six to eight months of intensive gun training in the academy as you allude to. Why do you keep dodging whenever someone asks you what your solution is?

That he is.

It appears Trump's strategy with China is working and "COWA" can't admit it.

You're making some assumptions here that he wasn't being strategic at all, which goes against what Raoul Leering stated in the article mrshoward provided. Leering is the head of international trade analysis at Dutch bank ING; making him much more qualified in this area than what you think you are. I find it very amusing you think there is a clandestine approach that should have been taken to impose tariffs on imports. Would you care to explain how a president or government for that matter could pull that off?

Mass transit coming to Paulding County will not bring the type of businesses the county needs to generate the tax revenue for the infrastructure improvements needed in the county, nor the money needed for the county to keep up with the growing costs to operate the county.

I answer questions, but when I ask a question of someone they refuse to answer; I in turn will not answer theirs.

He's a friggin hypocrite. He demands others to answer his questions, yet refuses to answer those asked of him.

Not at all. I was making a point that insurance does not prevent anything. Now why don't you explain why you brought gun insurance into the debate?

You're the one who brought up insurance for gun owners. Why won't you explain what you mean?

I don't expect auto insurance to prevent auto accidents at all. You're the one who keeps bringing up gun owners should carry insurance in the debate about gun violence and gun control.

Gun owners should not be required to obtain insurance. If you think that would curtail gun violence, then you're more stupid than I thought. Auto accidents still occur with auto owners being required to have insurance. The majority of those who drink and drive have car insurance, yet drunk driving accidents still occur. Drunk driving claims more than 10,000 lives a year. Insurance didn't prevent a single one of them.

Apparently, whatever answer I give you will be unreasonable to you as it appears you really don't want to address or admit to the root problem of violence in this country. You would much rather believe a simple solution to violence would be to ban gun ownership.

So you are of the belief that culture in this country is not the problem resulting in the rise of violence?

The problem is not guns - it's culture. GD and others have already identified one of the most significant problem in this country are the number of single-parent households in this country. Most kids today do not receive the discipline and parenting they should. The entertainment industry to include video games glorify violence and desensitizes people to violence.

What you're saying here is that people should make no attempt to defend themselves from a superior force; to just surrender their lives.

If he were a law abiding citizen, he would never have never committed those crimes.

Let's face the facts. Law abiding citizens do not purchase a gun of any kind with the intent to go out to shoot people. The liberals here and around the country know that. They also know that tough gun control laws such as those in Chicago have not prevented shootings, as it is those who ignore the laws who are shooting others. The gun control advocates know that gun control laws do not prevent criminals from killing others. What they actually believe and want is a complete ban of guns in this country and they are willing to achieve that objective by starting with the banning of certain t

Those individuals who were indicted were indicted for offenses that had absolutely nothing to do with the campaign and occurred well before Trump was even a presidential candidate.

Out of curiosity, who have you identified as being Russian sympathizers here? I don't see any.