adult.

What was it in 2007, LTO? Latinos Take Over?

LTO: Latinos Take Over.

And we call this the land of the free...

Is Atlanta really that scary? I've been here for a few years, and there never seems to be a problem as long as you aren't an idiot (don't walk down Boulevard at night, stick to busy roads if you're downtown, etc). Plus, Atlanta is pretty bike friendly.

15mg of melatonin, a quick spank session, and . Works like a charm.

What is it exactly that's bothering you here? Is it the fact that genetic engineering may occur, or that it may be available only to the wealthy?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4GCwW2pLzA

I still fail to see how legalizing gay marriage would be shoving anything "down your throat." If gay people may join in a union called "marriage," how are your rights curbed? How does this change the way you live your life? Unless you're just so revolted by the notion of gay people calling their loving relationship the same thing you call your loving relationship that you simply can't carry on, I don't see any way this would affect you on a practical level. Unless you're just a homophobe to an incredible degree, nothing is being shoved down your throat. You want to bitch and moan about equal r

The silly argument isn't the one that asserts a word can't refer to two different things? There are plenty of things that are legal that I don't accept. What rights are being "trampled" here?

Wasn't "separate but equal" addressed by the Supreme Court a while ago? Why the necessity to call them different things, anyway? A man can be named James and I can call him Jim, but they're the same thing. If the government issues marriages and civil unions with the exact same rights, what is the difference aside from bureaucratic nonsense?

The impossibility of a woman properly parallel parking has nothing to do with genetics.

I merely said the two fight for what they believe; you seem to think it's justified for the former to behave like the latter.

It's reprehensible that you think one man who fights for what he believes is an animal whose corpse deserves desecration, while another man who fights for what he believes is at no fault for desecrating said corpse (because this is such a decent, humane act).

It isn't uncomfortable to me; I see a corpse as no more than lifeless matter. I just wouldn't be surprised to see a double standard.

So we all agree it's totally cool for the Taliban to piss on our dead soldiers, too, right?