wcso84
-
Content Count
1,917 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by wcso84
-
-
Hey, why not. the tax payer is going to foot the bill one way or the other. prison baby......welfare baby
= taxpayer suported. It's a safe bet these folks were not productive citizins prior to entering the pen and were on the government teat already.
-
I do appreciate what you guys do, when the rules are followed. I will never do that job no matter how much it pays. All I am saying is my speed never changed, I didn't even realized the guy was after me until he turned around and followed me. My surprise was when he told me how fast I was going, according to him.... Now is between me and the judge... enough time wasted here.
Don't let the doorknob hitcha.....
SEEya.
-
Well... well... well... Mister bad @$$ again..... Guess who is going into my ignore list.....YOU.No need to waste my time playing your little "power trip game"...... Get lost...
YEeeeaaah.
Most officers give 15 - 20 mph before they stop...however some on here are using that to create some sort of conspiracy theory.I wasn’t even going to try to explain that one to them.
-
Well... well... well... Mister bad @$$ again..... Guess who is going into my ignore list.....YOU.
Blah Blah Blah..... When you have your cruise control on, don't tap on the breaks and both vehicles are moving, you going west and the cop car going east, your explanation goes out the door...........Yes I was going 10 over the limit and for that I will pay, no problem there, but when the numbers don't match and you see a pattern of the same BS, well...you know BS...
Karma goes both ways buddy......you'll have your day... guarantee
That’s right, can’t handle the heat get out of the kitchen. Same thing you did last time I put you on the spot (heeeeer dogydogydogy) and challenged you to put up or shut up, you disappear for a while. You folks are all the same. Have a nice day and smile BIG when you pay your ticket. KARMA.
-
I would go to court.
I got a ticket a few years ago in Hiram, the only one I've ever had, for a "rolling stop" at a 4-way crossing. I so wish I would have gone and fought it, but I didn't. It cost me in higher insurance because of it. If I had fought it, I think I would have won. The other side of the story is there was no other cars at the 4-way stop, I wasn't speeding, AND I was trying to get home to my child who had passed out at a sports practice, and had to leave!!!
If you told the same story in court you would not have “won” it, the judge may conceder the circumstances and may have shown “mercy” on you.
The fact that there are no other cars at an intersection like this does not mean the traffic control device becomes optional.
The only stop signs that are optional are the ones with a white outline. <runningawayfastnow>
-
NO FAIR! My LIDAR cert ran out!
Well you better get it in check, you are going to miss out on the new car bonus they just came out with.
Awww phoey , who worries about that trivial stuff anyway?
-
pffft, I already got my toaster! HAHA
Aww brutha you slackin. I already got my trip to Hawaii.
-
You mean to tell me that you don't just pick on people during your shift? You really don't just stop folks for shoots and giggles??????
Shushhhhh. How am I gonna make my quota if you give away our secrets???
-
Wow... exactly the same situation, blue lights turn on, cop car coming towards me, looked down and saw 55.....
Want some cheeeeeez to go wit that whine?
"karma is a Biotch"<quoting thedogs from a previous topic.> aint it.
To the OP, I say go to court, if you are guilty or not. It is the states burden to prove guilt. You have nothing to lose by going, and it just may work to your benefit by showing up.
What people do not realize is the officer sees you before you see him and is already building a tracking history. You are clipimg along at 70 in a 55 zone and you see what looks like some kind of automobile on the side of the road, subconsciously you start to decelerate, as you approach the automobile you realize that it is a law enforcement vehicle and let off the accelerator and look down to check your speed and WHEW, you are at 66 in a 55 no biggie. So the officer pulls you over and writes you a ticket for 70 in a 55, the 70 you were doing before you noticed the car on the side of the road, you are livid, the officer is wrong because you looked at your speedometer when you first realized that it was an officer and you were doing 66. The officer can tell exactly when you start to notice him also. He sees you coming estimates your speed and then activates his radar and the target speed shows 70, he observes a constant 70 for a bit and then watches as it slowly drops a few MPH and then all of the sudden BAM a 5-10 MPH drop almost instantly, yep they have recognized the police car.
And don’t forget that the speedometers are not certified as far as their calibration goes, so they could be off by a few MPH one way or the other. Changes in tire and rim sixe will also have an effect on the accuracy of the speedometer.
Don’t believe me? Go on a ride along with a traffic unit and see just exactly how it works, if you are open minded and willing to learn something I think you will see things in a different light.
But from previous threads that have turned in to “bashacop” threads where "stories" were posted with the intent to discredit law enforcement and were exposed as blatant lies and truth fell upon deaf ears (or eyes) , I doubt any one would be interested in learning the truth anyway.
Ya know, there are plenty of folks out there doing 20+ over the limit; we don’t need to make $h1t up just to make cases.
-
I tried, mom wont talk to me and dad is in florida and told me to keep my nose out of it....
not sure what to do...
Be careful.
Understand, I am not saying you have done any of these things, but if the juveniles parents have had an attitude with/ don’t like you and told you to “stay out of it” they very well may attempt to play this card.
16-5-45
(a) As used in this Code section, the term:
(1) 'Child' means any individual who is under the age of 17 years or any individual who is under the age of 18 years who is alleged to be a deprived child as such is defined in Code Section 15-11-2, relating to juvenile proceedings.
(2) 'Committed person' means any child or other person whose custody is entrusted to another individual by authority of law.
(3) 'Lawful custody' means that custody inherent in the natural parents, that custody awarded by proper authority as provided in Code Section 15-11-45, or that custody awarded to a parent, guardian, or other person by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(B(1) A person commits the offense of interference with custody when without lawful authority to do so the person:
(A) Knowingly or recklessly takes or entices any child or committed person away from the individual who has lawful custody of such child or committed person;
(B Knowingly harbors any child or committed person who has absconded; or
© Intentionally and willfully retains possession within this state of the child or committed person upon the expiration of a lawful period of visitation with the child or committed person.
(2) A person convicted of the offense of interference with custody shall be punished as follows:
(A) Upon conviction of the first offense, the defendant shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not less than $200.00 nor more than $500.00 or shall be imprisoned for not less than one month nor more than five months, or both fined and imprisoned;
(B Upon conviction of the second offense, the defendant shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not less than $400.00 nor more than $1,000.00 or shall be imprisoned for not less than three months nor more than 12 months, or both fined and imprisoned; and
© Upon the conviction of the third or subsequent offense, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.
©(1) A person commits the offense of interstate interference with custody when without lawful authority to do so the person knowingly or recklessly takes or entices any minor or committed person away from the individual who has lawful custody of such minor or committed person and in so doing brings such minor or committed person into this state or removes such minor or committed person from this state.
(2) A person also commits the offense of interstate interference with custody when the person removes a minor or committed person from this state in the lawful exercise of a visitation right and, upon the expiration of the period of lawful visitation, intentionally retains possession of the minor or committed person in another state for the purpose of keeping the minor or committed person away from the individual having lawful custody of the minor or committed person. The offense is deemed to be committed in the county to which the minor or committed person was to have been returned upon expiration of the period of lawful visitation.
(3) A person convicted of the offense of interstate interference with custody shall be guilty of a felony and shall be imprisoned for not less than one year nor more than five years.
-
where do you get your information? I have been researching the sex abuse laws here in Georgia for awhile as I have a immediate family member who is now in his 20's, who has spent years in jail for a non phyical (verbal)sexual assault on a girl a few years younger than himself. I am not saying what he did was right it wasn't....it was WAY wrong but being labled as a child molester who got a deal is the kind of thing that will keep him from getting a good job or have a peaceful happy life in society when he gets out. He doesn't deserve that and if Georgia would let us know the offenders from the predators we would all have a better understanding of what we are dealing with.
The only “sexual assault” charge that Georgia has deals with people in custody, or in institutions or doctors care. Even under this statute there must be a physical act.
16-6-5. Enticing a child for indecent purposes
(a) A person commits the offense of enticing a child for indecent purposes when he or she solicits, entices, or takes any child under the age of 16 years to any place whatsoever for the purpose of child molestation or indecent acts.
(B Except as provided in subsection © of this Code section, a person convicted of the offense of enticing a child for indecent purposes shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than 30 years. Any person convicted under this Code section of the offense of enticing a child for indecent purposes shall, in addition, be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
© If the victim is at least 14 but less than 16 years of age and the person convicted of enticing a child for indecent purposes is 18 years of age or younger and is no more than four years older than the victim, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall not be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
16-6-4. Child molestation; aggravated child molestation
(a A person commits the offense of child molestation when he or she does any immoral or indecent act to or in the presence of or with any child under the age of 16 years with the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of either the child or the person.
(B (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a person convicted of a first offense of child molestation shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years and shall be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Sections 17-10-6.2 and 17-10-7. Upon a defendant being incarcerated on a conviction for a first offense, the Department of Corrections shall provide counseling to such defendant. Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, upon a second or subsequent conviction of an offense of child molestation, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten years nor more than 30 years or by imprisonment for life and shall be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Sections 17-10-6.2 and 17-10-7; provided, however, that prior to trial, a defendant shall be given notice, in writing, that the state intends to seek a punishment of life imprisonment.
(2) If the victim is at least 14 but less than 16 years of age and the person convicted of child molestation is 18 years of age or younger and is no more than four years older than the victim, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall not be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
© A person commits the offense of aggravated child molestation when such person commits an offense of child molestation which act physically injures the child or involves an act of sodomy.
(d (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a person convicted of the offense of aggravated child molestation shall be punished by imprisonment for life or by a split sentence that is a term of imprisonment for not less than 25 years and not exceeding life imprisonment, followed by probation for life, and shall be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Sections 17-10-6.1 and 17-10-7.
(2) A person convicted of the offense of aggravated child molestation when:
(A) The victim is at least 13 but less than 16 years of age;
(b The person convicted of aggravated child molestation is 18 years of age or younger and is no more than four years older than the victim; and
© The basis of the charge of aggravated child molestation involves an act of sodomy
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall not be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.1
16-6-3. Statutory rape
(a) A person commits the offense of statutory rape when he or she engages in sexual intercourse with any person under the age of 16 years and not his or her spouse, provided that no conviction shall be had for this offense on the unsupported testimony of the victim.
(B Except as provided in subsection © of this Code section, a person convicted of the offense of statutory rape shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years; provided, however, that if the person so convicted is 21 years of age or older, such person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than 20 years. Any person convicted under this subsection of the offense of statutory rape shall, in addition, be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
© If the victim is at least 14 but less than 16 years of age and the person convicted of statutory rape is 18 years of age or younger and is no more than four years older than the victim, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
16-6-2. Sodomy; aggravated sodomy; medical expenses
(a) (1) A person commits the offense of sodomy when he or she performs or submits to any sexual act involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another.
(2) A person commits the offense of aggravated sodomy when he or she commits sodomy with force and against the will of the other person or when he or she commits sodomy with a person who is less than ten years of age. The fact that the person allegedly sodomized is the spouse of a defendant shall not be a defense to a charge of aggravated sodomy.
(B (1) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this Code section, a person convicted of the offense of sodomy shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years and shall be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
(2) A person convicted of the offense of aggravated sodomy shall be punished by imprisonment for life or by a split sentence that is a term of imprisonment for not less than 25 years and not exceeding life imprisonment, followed by probation for life. Any person convicted under this Code section of the offense of aggravated sodomy shall, in addition, be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Sections 17-10-6.1 and 17-10-7.
© When evidence relating to an allegation of aggravated sodomy is collected in the course of a medical examination of the person who is the victim of the alleged crime, the law enforcement agency investigating the alleged crime shall be financially responsible for the cost of the medical examination to the extent that expense is incurred for the limited purpose of collecting evidence.
(d) If the victim is at least 13 but less than 16 years of age and the person convicted of sodomy is 18 years of age or younger and is no more than four years older than the victim, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall not be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Section 17-10-6.2.
16-6-1. Rape
(a) A person commits the offense of rape when he has carnal knowledge of:
(1) A female forcibly and against her will; or
(2) A female who is less than ten years of age.
Carnal knowledge in rape occurs when there is any penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ. The fact that the person allegedly raped is the wife of the defendant shall not be a defense to a charge of rape.
(B A person convicted of the offense of rape shall be punished by death, by imprisonment for life without parole, by imprisonment for life, or by a split sentence that is a term of imprisonment for not less than 25 years and not exceeding life imprisonment, followed by probation for life. Any person convicted under this Code section shall, in addition, be subject to the sentencing and punishment provisions of Code Sections 17-10-6.1 and 17-10-7.
© When evidence relating to an allegation of rape is collected in the course of a medical examination of the person who is the victim of the alleged crime, the law enforcement agency investigating the alleged crime shall be responsible for the cost of the medical examination to the extent that expense is incurred for the limited purpose of collecting evidence.
-
Is this for all the states in the US?
Does sodomy in this statute only refer to anal penatration or is it defined by the webster's version?
Sodomy is defined by state statute, not webster, when dealing with the judicial system
-
-
I believe a hunting dog is defined as "one who hunts". These dogs do not hunt. They eat, crap, breed, have puppys and bark. Thats it in a nutshell.
Just asking, you didn’t seem to know a lot about them. Like I said, having 18 dogs is not a crime. When you have 18 dogs there is bound to be a smell emanating from the area.
I know a lot of folks who hunt and have a butload of hounds.
The best your friend can do is file a complaint with animal control and let them investigate it.
-
This is posted on behalf of a friend;
My friend has a neighbor who has at least 18 beagles and who knows how many puppies. You can smell the dog sh*# from my friends back deck. They bark and bay all night long. This is not in a subdivision, but on a main road with Estate Houses on large lots. This is not the "hood" nor the "country". I'm sure several laws are being broken. At a minimum; Non Licensed Breeder, Non Licensed Business.
Who do I call in addition to animal control?
Are they hunting dogs? having 18 dogs is not by default a crime.
-
I did, and the Veterinarian charged me $45.00 for that also. I just didn't include that, because I was just showing what the new $170.70 itemization consisted of.
Well WT, with all of the taxes being imposed on those evil do-gooders that make over 250K a year or so, you just don’t think they are going to suck it up and absorb all that themselves. That is what happens when you tax folks who provide services based on their revenue, you tax them into oblivion or the consumer sees higher prices for services.
For those that wanted change, there ya go.
-
Best advice on this thread.
YUUPPPP.
-
All within a 45 mile radius of where I work.
http://www.officer.com/online/article.jsp?...=2&id=46375
The Associated Press
CRESTVIEW, Fla. --
A man accused of beating his wife killed two north Florida sheriff's deputies who caught up with him at a shooting range, then fled across the county line, where he died in an exchange of gunfire with deputies, authorities said.
It happened around 1 p.m. Saturday when the two Okaloosa County deputies went to Shoal River Sporting Clays and Shooting Center in response to a domestic violence call, sheriff's officials said.
The Associated Press
http://www.officer.com/online/article.jsp?...=2&id=46376
HEADLAND, Ala. --
Officers in southeast Alabama shot a suspect to death after he killed one police officer and badly wounded a sheriff's deputy, authorities said.
Police said they got a call Friday afternoon that 53-year-old Fred Davis was firing a shotgun into the air outside his trailer. Henry County Sheriff's Deputy Ted Yost was first on the scene, and Davis shot and wounded him with the shotgun, State Trooper Kevin Cook said.
Davis then shot and killed Headland Officer Dexter Hammond with a high-powered rifle before other arriving officers shot and killed him, Cook said.
-
Here is a list of the current season's TV series that have been canceled:
ABC
Dirty Sexy Money
Eli Stone
Life on Mars
Pushing Daisies
CBS
The Ex List
Fox
Prison Break
NBC
Crusoe
Lipstick Jungle
My Own Worst Enemy
Knight Rider - Not officially confirmed
Kings - Not officially confirmed
The CW
Reaper - Not confirmed
ABC Family
Kyle XY
FX Network
The Riches
USA Network
The Starter Wife
On the Bubble Shows
Chuck
Dollhouse
Eleventh Hour (not likely to be canceled)
Law & Order
Life
Medium
Privileged
Reaper
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles
WOW. I can honestly say I have NEVER seen any of those shows.
If I could just pay for the one channel I watch I would be happy. TVland.
-
Yep.... up on wood blocks....
Is that a RV poop tank drain hose?????
-
According to our pest control service, it's ILLEGAL to kill lady bugs in Georgia!
WELLLL, I dont know about all that now..... I dont think i would want to be the officer in court for the "ladybug" murder.
-
Last year we had a salamander get in and kept hanging around the fireplace. The 4 cats were jumpy for days. I kept trying to find it, catch it and put it outside, but never could. Finally 2 WEEKS later I found him dried up in a crevice of the brick around the fireplace. Poor thing was probably trying to hide from the cats!
The frogs, lizards and spiders are good things to have around the yard. They catch the flies, knats, fleas, aphids etc and eat them. Lady bugs will eat the aphids off rose bushes. So I try not to hurt the "good" critters.
YOus get bad mojo if you hurts a ladybug.
-
Just looking at that picture makes me light headed. I KNOW they can't hurt me...I KNOW it, but I am so terrified of them I tend to act like an idiot when one scurries near me. Honestly, what could they possibly do to me? I KNOW it, but I can't help it. Call me crazy...Oh wait, lots of people do!
BUT they're soooo cute.
-
Who turned the ballons loose in Dallas?
in Internet Cafe
Posted
yEA, like their favorite saying, “november12345 radar contact, remain clear of the class Bravo……..”. Like they are all that busy at 0200 on a Sunday morning that they can’t clear someone through the Bravo. I can see them in there now, laughing while watching the altitude and heading changes on the LONE blip on the scope. Entertainment value, that can be the only explanation.