Jump to content
Paulding.com

ITMFA

Members
  • Content Count

    9,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by ITMFA

  1. Deflection by no means. Its up to date news that no one is talking about. I would hope you wouldn't want to suppress such a fact.

     

    On a side note: So with a new president, we should ignore the previous administration's actions or lack thereof? Just making sure we play by the same rules. Do a Paulding.com search.....From 2009 - 2017 you mentioned Bush 500-750 times (guesstimation). That's more deflection than you can shake a stick at.

     

    - Jamie

    On 8/18/2009, guess who said "Newsflash, Bush isn't president anymore."

    http://paulding.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=218920&p=2877929

    • Like 1
  2.  

    Deflection by no means. Its up to date news that no one is talking about. I would hope you wouldn't want to suppress such a fact.

     

    On a side note: So with a new president, we should ignore the previous administration's actions or lack thereof? Just making sure we play by the same rules. Do a Paulding.com search.....From 2009 - 2017 you mentioned Bush 500-750 times (guesstimation). That's more deflection than you can shake a stick at.

     

    - Jamie

     

    Not sure how you ran your search but I only get 469. "Bush isn't President anymore" comes up 58Xs from a number of cons during the same period so we are playing by the rules the cons made up. If cons don't like it, why do they do it? Just more hypocrisy from cons?

    8)

  3.  

    Apparently she's met with a few folks...

     

     

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-butina-exclusive/exclusive-accused-russian-agent-butina-met-with-us-treasury-fed-officials-idUSKBN1KC0DC

     

    Think we should investigate what was discussed?

     

    - Jamie

    Considering that administration no longer has power, may be we should deflect for the current administration. Let's see if it has the same traction.

  4.  

     

    Must be that spark of divinity and all that talk about abolishing ICE...

     

    Or that time the media went crazy when Trump called them "animals."

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinaloa_Cartel

     

    Warning : Never Google "sinaloa cartel murders" and click images ! ! !

     

    Seriously... don't do it ! ! !

     

    Way worse than anything I've ever seen from ISIS ! ! !

     

    You've been warned ! ! !

     

    Happening right there... on our unsecure Southern border.

     

    Operating with impunity.

     

    Right in our backyard.

     

    8)

    More fear mongering. Organized crime commits the same acts everywhere. Putin would call them amateurs.

  5. They never cared about the children :

     

    2009 -2014

     

    ACLU OBTAINS DOCUMENTS SHOWING WIDESPREAD ABUSE OF CHILD IMMIGRANTS IN U.S. CUSTODY

     

     

    https://www.aclu.org/news/aclu-obtains-documents-showing-widespread-abuse-child-immigrants-us-custody

     

     

    :o :o :o

     

    So it started with the 2 previous administrations, or before, and ended during that last administration? Then restarted with the current Trump Administration?

  6. He didn't mention the Republicans or I would have.

     

    Dunno why you get such a stiffy thinking I'm a loyal partisan, but whatever. Maybe you're like Cain and can't fathom going through life without a party to tell you what to think.

     

    No one has to mention Dems and you drag them in it anyway. You and this hyena have a lot in common don't you?

     

    Hyena.jpg

    • Like 1
  7. Most people would take that as a threat.

     

    Nice try but it was no more a threat than the post I responded to. Being a hypocrite is what you do best.

     

    So I'll advise you again not to mention my wife or children.

     

    I’m no fan of her husband, but I do wish her a speedy recovery.

    I have little doubt she voted for Hillary.

  8. You're the one who went to great pains to trace the route of my photo hosting account so you could find out who I was. Should I be concerned that you're stalking my photobucket account (which I stopped using because they locked out 3rd party hosting)?

    I right clicked on your picture and chose properties and it pointed to your photbucket. That's not "great pains", that's st0000pidity on your part. Long before I did that you were constantly harping about my identity. So yeah, anyone that harps on my identity that is dumb enough to reveal his own identity, is going to be found out. For someone that claims intellectual superiority...

    stupid-is.jpg?w=356&h=200

  9. You'd be surprised what I have found out.

     

    Nothing we might say about each other justifies bringing member's families into it.

     

    So I'll advise you again not to mention my wife or children.

    I never initiate personal insults with you or anyone else so don't create a false equivalency of what we may say to each other AFTER YOU BEGIN HOSTILITIES. I don't start hostilities but I will finish them.

     

    I didn't mention your wife and child but I'd advise you to take a long walk of a short peer the next time you think about leading a conversation in this direction again. You won't like the results of any such future exchange.

  10. ^This

     

    You can say most anything about me, but if you bring my family into it, you're libel to start something you don't want to finish.

     

     

    Remember....I know who most of you are in real life. Even those of you hiding behind hijacked screen names. You have an insider who talks.

    The reality is, you think you know who i am but you have no clue. I on the other hand no precisely who you are. I have given you permission to post who I am if you know and you have declined. Not only have you declined, you have not given me permission to post who you are. I've even messaged you and told you who you were.

     

    Those who don't like conversations getting up close and personal should not get personal at all. If you do, it is a given that you won't like the results.

  11. Well since he's even older than you are, probably not. But there again, he can afford the blue pills, so maybe he is.

    I'm sure Trump has receipts and bank statements to prove he's getting laid. I'm not so sure about Melania though. The way she was giggling with Obama at Babs Bush's service, she's ripe for the picking.

  12. I think I have this figured out.

     

    You, pubby, The Postman, COWA...

     

    I bet none of you have been laid in years. Probably can't perform anymore and can't afford blue pills.

     

    Impotence and sexual frustration. That's about all that would explain the anger and hate you guys have. Attacking the man's wife now.

     

    Poor fellers.

    Nonsense- I get laid all the time. Just ask your... never mind. I do appreciate your concern.

  13.  

    Looking at all the topics you started on that "other site" - which is basically all of them - and the 17,000 comments you have on pcom I could ask you the same question

     

     

    ... Oh wait are you projecting again ? :acute:

     

    It must be quite a PRIVILEGE to malign a decorated war hero like Mueller and federal law enforcement. I don't think Obama would be afforded the same PRIVILEGE. With April 17th coming up, we've seen Obama's proof of birth. I wonder if we'll see his successors tax returns.

×
×
  • Create New...