OldGoat99 Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 There is a right to life vote on the Republican ticket and not the Democrat ticket... Why are they different? This is not right... And yes I have problem with it. This needs to be changed and I don't care how much it costs. To me this is a slated vote and tainted vote. Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyJ Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 I assume those are 'planks' for the Republicans. Link to post Share on other sites
mrshoward Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Why would a question for Republican party voters in the Republican primary appear on the Democratic primary ballot ??? :blink: Link to post Share on other sites
Georgia Dawg Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Because it say it's a REPUBLICAN PARTY QUESTION. On the Democratic ballot there would be DEMOCRATIC PARTY QUESTIONS. Link to post Share on other sites
OldGoat99 Posted June 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 My question is why can one party have a issue question asked like this and not another? The question will be used towards a end item that is tainted. So why allow it. It is not a balance vote on the line item on the ballet. Why would a question for Republican party voters in the Republican primary appear on the Democratic primary ballot ??? :blink: Link to post Share on other sites
markdavd Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 My question is why can one party have a issue question asked like this and not another? The question will be used towards a end item that is tainted. So why allow it. It is not a balance vote on the line item on the ballet. This is how primaries work - think back to your HS civics class. The Democrats could have just as easily had the question placed on their primary ballot. Your question should be why didn't they? Link to post Share on other sites
surepip Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Partisan Politics The Repubs are still wanting to kick the dead horse somemore with the RTL Legislation. If this is approved in the primary, expeted to see substantial amounts of time, energy and effort wasted in the next Legislative Session trying to pass a bill that the Supreme Court will void. Link to post Share on other sites
Cathyhelms Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Partisan Politics The Repubs are still wanting to kick the dead horse somemore with the RTL Legislation. If this is approved in the primary, expeted to see substantial amounts of time, energy and effort wasted in the next Legislative Session trying to pass a bill that the Supreme Court will void. I thought you were Catholic?? RTL is a dead horse?? I'm so confused. Link to post Share on other sites
The Sound Guy Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Each ballot is controlled by the party it belongs to. Only the final election, (November I guess?) will be the same for everyone. Link to post Share on other sites
surepip Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I thought you were Catholic?? RTL is a dead horse?? I'm so confused. I am Catholic, but also realistic and pragmatic. My 2 issues with the RTL movement and those wanting State Legislation: 1] Until the Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade, no piece of legislation will stand up in court. 2] Are the RTL supporters going to support a ban on birth control pills as well ? Link to post Share on other sites
gpatt0n Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 What that vote is about is getting out the vote for the primary. One of the key factions in the GOP, one they depend on for support, are the religious conservatives. If the issue is whether Beverly Cochran or Todd Pownall (or any of the others) are elected doesn't rise to a moral imperative and won't be preached from the pulpit. Said differently, they have to put something on the ballot that will bring these often single-issue voters to the polls and right to life issues, gay marriage issues, etc. are proven tools to that end. So while they can't get a preacher to stand in the pulpit and speak of the morality of the SPLOST, they can get him to say the flock will go to hell if they don't make their opinion known in the RTL vote on the Republican ballot! Don't think, Navy Eagle, that the Dems are wholly innocent. That there is an allegation of a deal that the popular Michael "Mike" Thurmond, currently Labor Commissioner, will get a good job after the election in part because he is challenging Senator Johnny Isackson is plausible. Why? Because the Dems need someone on the ballot in Georgia that will help energize the black constituency. That we know it is all politics is because, well, we've seen this dog and pony show before ... pubby PS: It really has nothing to do with RTL; but has everything to do with GOTV. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now