Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'courts'.
-
"Frustrated Chapter 2" is now available online and it's really good. This documentary takes an unbridled look into the issues of family law that the COURTS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT. Peeking behind the curtain of family law, you learn about paternity fraud, parental alienation, false allegations, the domestic violence industrial complex, child support and more. What is Social Security Act Title IV-D and how do states profit from it? For me, watching the documentary raises many questions. Should patterns of unethical conduct be investigated by the GA Bar? Is parental alienation unethical
- 2 replies
-
- frustrated
- troubled
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
When it comes to being disingenuous in court, where are the boundaries drawn? If someone will lie in court and or allow someone else to mislead the court, what does that say? "Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either." - Albert Einstein https://www.scribd.com/doc/263855864/Motion-to-Set-Aside-Amended-3 http://paulding.com/forum/topic/316043-is-this-improper-ex-parte-communication-between-chief-judge-tonny-s-beavers/
-
Is this improper ex parte communication between Judge Tonny S. Beavers and the petitioner in this case? If this is improper what else was discussed that the Respondent was not made aware of? Is deposing the judge the only way to know for sure if the Petitioner had concealed other discussions? The Respondent was not made aware of the Petitioner and Judge #TonnyBeavers' ex parte discussion of Facebook postings. The Respondent was not made aware the Court instructed the Petitioner to bring Facebook postings to court. The Court abruptly overruled Respondent's objection and ended any further d
-
This is basically what happens when you take the "high ground" and don't educate others on parental alienation and what goes on in courts. You end up never seeing your kids again.
-
If you ever thought gay marriage was about gay love, guess again. It was always about money. They just had to devise a way for the conservative public to go along with it. As fewer straight couples marry and more lawyers graduate law school, there was a niche that needed to be created and filled.
-
Can't get a contempt order with "teeth" for visitation violations? Have you read the fine print? The jokes on me and may be you, too. If your court order assigns one parent "final decision making authority", where the parties don't agree, and you aren't the decision maker, you have an order written on toilet paper. The "decider" has broad decision making authority and anything in that order is subject to the whim of the "decider". This includes your visitation or anything else written in the terms of the custodial agreement. The racket is now in play. This nullity of your state's family law
-
This is a somewhat helpful guide to understanding how family law racketeering is kept a secret from the public. How can you tell if a family court judge is a criminal? He's wearing a robe.
- 1 reply
-
- racketeering
- troubled
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
I can't say that my experiences here in Paulding County were any different than what goes on in New Jersey. Because false allegations are accepted in lieu of evidence, if you aren't a criminal going into Paulding "UnFamily" Court, you will have a hard time not being one coming out of it. Your Constitutional rights would be pummeled if they didn't check them at the door before you entered the court.
-
The Clerk of the Superior Court of Columbia County called out a Judge for attempting to hold her in contempt for not following an improper order. The judge emailed the order to her and it was rejected as spam so she never received it. Regardless of this the Order was still improper. Judges in Georgia have simply run amok, abuse discretion, abuse process and abuse power. There is no way to put it but they are finally getting push back since the JQC is toothless. https://www.scribd.com/doc/267802974/AUGUSTA-Judicial-Misconduct-Affidavit-of-Cindy-Mason
- 3 replies
-
- 1
-
- judicial
- misconduct
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
Should superior court and magistrate judges have lifetime appointments? Judges that are appointed by governors and then run unopposed for 20-30 years have an antiquated mindset. In the 21st Century, judges are on the wrong side of history. It is time these judges are replaced with a fresh mindset. Having term limits would go a long way towards accomplishing this. There certainly is no shortage of lawyers to replace them. Until term limits can be implemented, recall elections may be necessary to remove some judges.
- 4 replies
-
- judicial
- corruption
- (and 4 more)
-
Do you remember when communist courts were considered kangaroo courts? Russia, China and Cuba all had kangaroo courts? Well the 21st century USA has joined the ranks. The only way to change this is to raise awareness and petition to remove judicial immunity. Until then there will be no redress for those victimized by judicial misconduct.
-
Friday morning, 4/17, starting at 9am in Cobb County. If you want to see great exposure of misconduct that has been enabled and perpetuated by certain court professionals, this is a great case to watch. Please email through MyAdvocateCenter.com for more details. Don't be bullied into silence by court "professionals".
-
This has been a fantastic week. So many exciting things with everyone over at proadvocateradio.com and now this ruling. SO HUGE!!!! For any Georgian who has been victimized by by a judge attempting to use a protective order as a gag order, this ruling is for you. Abuse of discretion runs rampant and so often the appellate courts just rubber stamp it. Not this time. Hats off to the Supreme Court and Justice Blackwell for a job well done.
-
Wait don't tell me, this guy is just upset because he didn't get his way in #KangarooCourt? This is because gov't is always just and reasonable. Judges always exercise common sense and good reason. Even when they abuse the process and discretion... And the mother who lied about who the father was isn't held accountable for paternity fraud? #SystemStuckOnStupid #BestInterestsOfMoney
-
Why anyone would ever think a judge is infallible is beyond me. They fail as much or more than anyone else.
-
LISTEN: Saturday morning at 8am for Pro Advocate Radio! We invited Georgia District Attorney David Cooke and the Executive Director for Voices for Georgia's Children, Pat Willis, to discuss the challenges we have in protecting children and other victims of abuse. This started out as a talk about "religious liberty" and what can be missed if we're not careful, but as of today the legislative proposal involving the right to use religious freedom as a defense in court is apparently off the table. The fact remains, though, that other "defenses" are being misused in#FamilyCourt to block cons
-
Your voice can literally be heard. You can make a difference in Paulding and in Georgia. Wish us luck as we enter a stage never ventured onto before! Is the talk radio world ready to take on the monkey business we families engage in when dealing with conflict? Keep your sense of humor intact but do send in your questions, especially the hard-hitting, serious ones so we know what matters to you! Expect to be challenged to make better choices as you tackle decisions about family matters. To connect with us and send us your input, please visit www.ProAdvocateRadio.org. We start this Monda
-
State Rep. for Connecticut, Minnie Gonzalez clip (just over a minute) explaining that family law is about money not children. You had better believe it is every state not just Connecticut. Georgia is among the worst with the corruption. The corruption goes from top to bottom. http://youtu.be/I-KYfFaR4z0
-
This... This is heartbreaking... THIS IS WHY WE FIGHT FOR FAMILY LAW REFORM. Frequently courts give custody of the child to the high conflict parent in a custody dispute. Giving shared custody or primary custody to the stable parent is NOT a money maker. The high conflict parent is effectively a cash cow for lawyers and the court because they keep things stirred up by filing motions or alienating the child by obstructing contact and visitation so the opposing party has to file motions. The courts do NOTHING to diffuse hostilities by ENFORCING its own Orders. After becoming a major contributo
- 18 replies
-
- highconflictparent
- hcp
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: