Jump to content
Paulding.com

rockysmom

Members
  • Content Count

    14,550
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    62

Posts posted by rockysmom

  1. He very well could, but he is pushing for and was elected on getting congress to fix our border crisis and immigration laws. If we learned anything from Obama, it is that what one president can do with the stroke of a pen, the next can undo. We don't need temporary fixes. We need republicans and democrats to come together and fix the issue. If children are important enough to force everyone into a room to discuss the issues, then we might want to get on it.

     

    - Jamie

    They could certainly step in and fix this quickly and follow up with another solution that would fix this permanently.

    • Like 1
  2. One would think that, but frankly, it just isn't that simple. The senate isn't anything like the house, which requires a simple majority. The senate requires 60 votes to even bring legislation to the floor to be discussed, amended and then voted on. Republicans at the present control (51) seats. So without democrat support, there is no vote to bring it to the floor. I'm not a rules junkie. If someone knows something different, by all means elaborate.

     

    - Jamie

    Jamie, as far as I know, trump could change his policy with a pen without congressional approval. If you know something different please share.

  3. The alternative to seperation of these families is to either release them into the United States pending

    adjudication of their asylum claims or to place the children in adult detention centers with their parents.

     

    Which one do you support ? ? ?

     

    (BTW: You cannot "support legal entry" and oppose real border security at the same time.)

     

    8)

    This was not an issue (of any great proportion except some cherry picked photos but not nearly what it has grown into) before trump decided to separate children from their parents so why did it blow up? I wonder if there is something else going on and this is just another diversion tactic.

     

    No one wants these people released into this country without the proper requirements being met. Again, I wonder what is motivating these people to try and cross illegally when they know what the consequences are. Why aren’t we hearing more about this side of the story? Some are saying they want asylum because they are being prosecuted, I would like to have more info.

  4. The only alternative is to release them into the country with a pinky promise to show up for asylum proceedings.

     

    Unless you are advocating placing children into adult detention centers ? ? ?

     

    I get the impression that you have not thought this thing through.

     

    8)

    Are you seriously going to say that ANYONE is suggesting that a “pinky promise” as a legal way to gain entry is the way to go? I get the impression that you are being condescending. When you are ready to have a “grown up” discussion on this issue, let me know.

    • Like 1
  5. You support unfettered illegal entry for anyone who shows up at the border with a child.

     

    http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/07/05/17-55208.pdf

     

    8)

     

     

     

    Which part of this story is a lie ? ? ?

     

     

     

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article213426999.html

     

    :unknw:

    You support unfettered illegal entry for anyone who shows up at the border with a child.

     

    http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/07/05/17-55208.pdf

     

    8)

     

     

     

     

     

    Which part of this story is a lie ? ? ?

     

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article213426999.html

     

    :unknw:

    Where did I post that I support “unfettered illegal entry” for anyone who shows up at the border with a child? I didn’t. You can say what you like but that doesn’t mean it’s the truth. You are lying.

     

    I support legal entry and I am asking myself just how bad does the threat that they are feeling need to be for these parents to be separated from their children? I would like to find a video that explains this rationale.

  6. Democrats did not require the separation of children from their parents. The existing LAW does not call for the separation of children from their parents PERIOD. It is the POLICY of the trump administration that the children and parents be separated. That policy can be changed by trumps pen. There is no need for congress to approve anything. The situation is being milked by trump as an opportunity to lie to the American people AGAIN.

     

    I don’t know which is crazier, the lies, or the fact that the trump followers are believing what he is saying. Talk about people being sheep.

  7. You'd be surprised what I have found out.

    Nothing we might say about each other justifies bringing member's families into it.

    So I'll advise you again not to mention my wife or children.

    He didn’t mention your wife or children. You interpreted it the way you needed to so you could get on a soapbox to cry foul.

    • Like 3
  8. If you're going to insult people about everything from intelligence to their sobriety to their sex lives to being on the take from political parties to their income level you don't get to choose how your insulted back, and guess what looking like a 2 year old is making a sport out of stalking people on this board 24/7 for the purpose of insulting and belittling them then acting like your some kind of a victim when it comes back at you.

     

    The first time I ever posted on this board was out of a sense of anger seeing a gang of people attacking a single person, I think what really pisses people off now is the numbers are not so lopsided, for the first time the predators might be just as likely to find themselves the prey.

     

    Well, you know these posts will only be met with something along the lines of “when in Rome.........”.

    • Like 2
  9. Boy, if you hadn't poked your nose where it doesn't belong we wouldn't be there.

    I have found that responding in kind to GD only results in him posting that you are “nasty.” IOW, he can post whatever insult he likes but when you respond in kind to his insults, he becomes the victim.

    • Like 2
  10. I think I have this figured out.

    You, pubby, The Postman, COWA...

    I bet none of you have been laid in years. Probably can't perform anymore and can't afford blue pills.

    Impotence and sexual frustration. That's about all that would explain the anger and hate you guys have. Attacking the man's wife now.

    Poor fellers.

    Hmmmm.....when you can’t come up with a reasonable, coherent point to be made all you have to do is make it a personal attack.

     

    Now that’s the mark of a real man. /s

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...