Jump to content
Paulding.com
  • entries
    2
  • comments
    2
  • views
    2,212

This is just the first part of my tireless rant .....


NumberCruncher

334 views

There are special programs in place for people who are living at or below the poverty level. I’m no genius, never claimed to be, so I can’t tell you exactly if the minimum wage and the poverty level go hand in hand. I’m going to assume that they do. I’m going to assume that someone working for minimum wage, and trying to raise at least one child, is living at or below the poverty level.

(Go ahead, rush off to google it, I give a crap. This here is my lecture, and I’ll deliver it as I see fit.)

Ahem, so…. These programs, whether food stamps peach care, tanf, afdc, reduced lunches, increased income tax deductions, etc., have got to be impacted by the new federal minimum wage. You’ve got a whole class of people who barely scrape by, and depend on these services to make it. By raising their incomes one of two things is bound to happen.

A.)They no longer qualify for the benefits they were most recently entitled to, and the freakin’ $28 per week ain’t enough to provide health insurance for their kids….

B.)They continue to qualify for the exact same benefits they were already receiving, because the standard for qualification has been changed.

Option A would just plain old suck, if you’re a Democrat. Since they voted the increase in, it would then be their fault that all the little ones are going without food and medical care. Doesn’t make their party look so great.

By Republican standards, this is not necessarily such a bad scenario. Less money going into the welfare system and so on and so forth.

Still, as captains of the minimum wage increase ship, I doubt the Democrats will throw the masses overboard.

So, let’s assume that we’ll be choosing option B.

On the surface, option B seems like the right/fair/just option. Let’s dig a little deeper, shall we?

 

Joe Blow is working for 7 bucks an hour. Its crap and he knows it, but he’s gettin’ by. He feels ok about himself, cause he is after all, making, more than minimum wage. He may live in somebody’s basement and drink discount beer on the weekends, but all in all, he’s making it work.

Suzy Q. on the other hand, is bustin’ her butt for the 5.15 that MegaLoMart doles out to part time employees who are required to be there 36 hours a week, but not a minute more cause by god, health insurance is only for full time managers! Her kids get seen at the free clinic for their school check ups, and her rent is controlled by some subsidized program. It’s a crappy life, and she just wants better for her and her kids.

She knows the wage hike is coming, and she’s holding on for dear life til it gets here.

 

Little does Joe Blow know about how lucky he’s fixin’ to get.

 

In order for Suzy Q to continue to receive all of the benefits she was previously dependant upon, one of two things has to happen.

1.)The government changes the standards to include all peoples working for 7 bucks an hour. This now entitles thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of “new” people to government benefits.

2.)The government changes the standards to include only those who were previously receiving benefits, thus creating some sort of new social class, not delineated by money at all.

 

 

How can option 2 exist, you ask? Beats the heck outta me…… but do you really think that the government is gonna let all those folks start receiving welfare? Seriously? Where the crap would all of that money come from? Do you know how much it costs to have 10 people on foods stamps, peach care, etc…? Now, multiply that by 10,000 more than were already enrolled in those programs.

The only solution to this? More taxes…..

 

 

I’ve got more to say, but (burp) I gotta get up and go pee. :blush:

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

This the reason why our system needs an welfare/health coverage overhaul. The attempt to wean the folks off the system by changing basic welfare to TANF benefits did help, but we still have the "working class poor." I believe the household income can be no greater than around $13,000 per year ... and let's face it, who can survive off that?

 

Our country is changing and the working class poor demographic is getting larger (in part due to immigration.)

 

Always good to look at who we are electing as officials and what they can do for our country. :)

 

Good post!

Link to comment

Not to just put myself out there like this but it might make you think I have 2 kids 19 months and 6 months both in diapers and one taking formula that is around 125.00 a month for month for formula and atleast 30 a week for 2 packs of diapers my husband works for 10 a hour 40 hours a week we also have rent utilities car insurance all the exspenses of living i want to go to work to help financially but if I do I lose my food stamps and medicaid for both my children also i would have to pay child care child care alone for two kids would eat up my whole check but in order for me to qualify for childcare assistance i have to already be working and on a waiting list yet who will watch my kids why i look for work and how can i pay for it untill i get assistance even if my husband gets any kind of raise i am cut off i think the system is so unfair it is keeping us down instead of helping us get ahead also my son has molluscum contagious and not allowed in daycare so he would need private daycare and they will not allow him to have this so how does a person get ahead with such strict guidelines who honestly could raise to kids so small on 10 an hour

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...