RadiomanATL
-
Content Count
285 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by RadiomanATL
-
-
No child left alive....errr...I mean "behind".
(joke!)
-
I have a '98 Ford Ranger that I'll sell for $1,200. 100k miles. Needs some minor work though to get it running. New alternator/battery and a brake job. Bumper damage on front and rear ends (got caught in an I-75 sandwich). Also radio was stolen out of it. So no tunes.
Total cost, probably, after brake and alternator battery repairs: $2,000.
Total cost after the above and fixing the bumpers: $2,500 (Maybe less. I think the brackets that hold the bumpers on just need to be replaced cause they bent. Bumpers themselves are OK).
Don't know what kind of radio someone would want, so I can't include that. I do have the original radio though (it was an aftermarket that was stolen). Maybe $200 to fix the dash and put the original radio in? I dunno. Total price to get *all* of it fixed is probably $2700. Just complete guesses on my part though.
I'm getting rid of it instead of fixing it up because we have small children and you can't (or not supposed to) put them in front seats. Being a truck and all, thats all it has.
BTW: Blue book for it is $3000, and thats in "fair" condition (meaning bumps and bruises like the bumpers).
Don't have a digital camera or else I would take pics. E-mail if interested RadiomanATL@yahoo.com
(I'll post this in the "goods" forum as well)
-
She kept him on the line to record it IMO. She's got tapes. Expect them to be leaked to the media shortly. Again, all IMO.
-
I even have a picture for mine.
-
errrr see below (darn attachments)
-
Just like the Bible, Every Paulding Resident should have a copy of Fahrenheit 9/11 in their homes.
Well, it would probably make a good sleep aid for me.
-
Don't remember, LOL.
All I remember is having to stand around for pictures for an eternity.
-
First job was at a Carwash. Had to get it to pay off my first speeding ticket (2 days after I turned 16.).
Had the job for 2 years, until I went to college. Then I worked in the college library (HORRIBLE job). Then on to radio.
-
LOL.
Yeah, I do want a bit of privacy.
Been around. Trying to stay outta trouble.
-
Mine signifies occupation, sex, and location.
Back when the internet and chatrooms were in their relative infancy (lo those 10 years ago) I got sick and tired of answering the a/s/l questions. So I came up with an ID that would answer everything but the age. If someone still asked, I would just laugh at them and give a sarcastic response.
-
I'm glad this part of it is gone:
Under the provision, the FBI does not have to show a judge a compelling need for the records [from phone or ISP's]... (from CNN http://money.cnn.com/2004/09/29/technology...t_act/index.htm )
THAT is completely uncostitutional. All I want is a valid search warrant, signed off by a judge. Under the PA, this wasn't even needed.
-
I'm with Mark,
As long as the private driving schools meet state requirements and such for the course work and teachers, I don't have a problem with it. It comes out to six of one, half dozen of the other.
-
Actually, I think that's the Dade county voter's registration office.
They fould out he's a republican, so they won't let him in.
Cold blooded, reptillian, brain the size of a pea, sits around all day doing nothing but eating...yup, fits the bill.
(Sorry, but you left yourself WIDE open for that one).
-
Sounds like the Taiwanese press is a bunch of Jackals. 2 incidents where a pack of people get right up in someone's face with flashing camera's.
-
-
Clinton & Carter didn't give nuclear capabilities to NK. Common partisan misconception. They agreed to help NK get a nuclear reactor that could not be used to obtain bomb making materials. In exchange, NK would have to give up the work on their reactor that *could* be used to obtain bomb making materal.
Now, Clinton tried to make it seem like a whole lot more than it was, claiming that NK's gave up their nuclear program, etc. etc. etc., and he was FOS there and he knew it. All he succeeded in doing was stalling the NK's nuclear program by a few years. This wasn't a bad thing though. Clinton was hoping for political change to come in the years of the 'stall', he was playing for another factor to come into play. It wasn't bad simply because there is nothing we can do to stop NK from getting the bomb. Uranium occurs naturally there. All they lacked was the technology to do something with it. And they've been attempting to get that technology since the end of the Korean war. First from the Soviets and China, and then in the last 20 years from Pakistan and Iran, and I think India as well. NK getting the bomb is/was inevitable. Clinton just put it off for a few years, hoping that a regime change, or another factor, would come into play. Blame can go to Clinton for trying to 'play it up', by making it seem that he was stopping them when all he was doing was stalling them, but Clinton can't be blamed for NK becoming a nuclear country. They've done that all on their own.
-
Z93 is owned by the same people as 650am.....write to them and get your Z93 back
Z93 is owned by Infinity. There is no 650 AM here in Atlanta. There is a WGST, which is 640, but they are owned by Clear Channel. There is also 680 The Fan, but they are owned by Dickey Broadcasting.
And writing to them will not do much good. Just a fact of life. They've invested way way way too much in Dave to turn away from it for at least 2 or 3 years.
-
My parents are evacuating early tomorrow morning. It looks like the eye is starting to move further westward of them, but why take the chance? Who wants to be stuck in a house with no electricty or running water for days?
-
I'd love to try it. It would especially be handy for work with their massive storage space. If you want, you can send it to RadiomanATL@yahoo.com.
-
How many married gay couples are there? Can they get married in every state? No. Hence the need for a program tailored to their needs. That is, if HD wants to keep them as employees. Obviously HD values them as such, and is willing to do something for them. No biggie as far as I'm concerned. It doesn't effect me one iota.
-
-
But it's not really a right. It's a private company. They can do as they wish, within the law. Private companies don't give 'rights' to people. The government does in some cases, and God does for others (if you believe that way). Private companies don't.
2 recourses left then: 1. Don't shop there, or 2. Demand the government do something. Many people have chosen option 1, and that truly is their 'right'. Demanding that the government do something doesn't sit well with me, nor with the vast majority of people here I imagine.
-
You waited until you were in the service?
(very, very, very poor and dirty joke)
-
Because the thought is that you can legally get married if you want, and then give the bennies to your now wife. Gays don't have that opportunity at the moment. Hence a program tailored more to them. I have a feeling though that an opposite sex bennies program isn't that far off for HD. Heck, they even have a health insurance program for workers pets, no matter what their sexual orientation
Heterosexuals have ‘overthrown’ marriage
in Internet Cafe
Posted
Wow, long thread.
Rather than re-hashing and going over everything again, I think I'll just cut and paste a post I made last night in response to someone else on a Yahoo board:
Jilly:
And Moralistic--being excessively moralistic is a problem.
RadiomanATL:
IMO, nothing wrong being moralistic, even "excessively" (thats subjective too).
The problem is when you want to force others to live by your own moral code, especially by using the force of the government. Certainly, using the government to enforce some morals is good. After all, murder is against morals and I think I like the government continuing to say that it is illegal.
My personal line in the sand is this: If the activity the other person is engaged in does not threaten, effect, or otherwise change my family's safety or finances, I don't care. They answer to God in the end. I don't answer for them.
Hence, I don't care if homosexuals are afforded the legal protections of a marriage by the government. God defines marriage, not government. So they can call it whatever they want. I don't care. Also, I am against blue laws. Dammit, I sometimes forget to purchase some beer for the game on Sunday, and I think I should be able to purchase it on that day. I'm also against helmet laws with a caveat: the person, if they are injured, doesn't effect my insurance rates through lawsuits aimed at others. There are many more examples.
I don't care if someone is moral, excessively moral, or immoral. Just don't try to use the power of the government to force your versions of the above on me (with the caveat that, again, some morals are certainly necessary--see murder example).
RM