Baby Cookie

we need to ban assault hands. too many children are hit and beaten by hands. Do we really NEED ten fingers?

Russians dont f*** around when it comes to war.

well if the tv is is a stolen tv then the person it was stolen from should be held responsible because their tv should have been secured better...pfffft...

you have no idea how guns are stolen and anyone telling me what he thinks i should do in MY home is welcomed to try though i seriously doubt they want to. jesus youre a world class moron. if someone steals youre alcohol then drunk drives and kills someone then by your logic its your fault...and that really stupid and youre really stupid for suggesting it. you are correct, i was simply engaging in hyperbole.

yes, a very high powered round at that. leave it ro the nazis to make something this nasty.

true enough. Thanks for reminding me. Not to mention that technically some tasers fire projectiles making them fall under the firearm category and those are NOT designed to kill. They also have developed non-lethal ammunition (Beanbag shotshels, rubber bullets) making firearms themselves nonlethal weapons at the owners discretion. So we can add To subdue (to STUN but not KILL humans)

8mm mauser spitzer round will go through an engine block.

Wow, you really ARE incapable of admitting when you are wrong! You didnt say anything about it being an everyday term. And you tried to correct me when I was using the word correctly. Zoo what you should have said is "Oh I didnt know that, maybe youre right, maybe I should look up words im not familiar before I accuse someone else of using them incorrectly. Sorry about that!" would it have been so hard? Yes it would. your Ego couldnt handle it. Just shut up.

From a broad perspective, sure. To end life. To kill. However to be more accurate there are multiple purposes under that umbrella... To hunt for food (KILL food) To defend ones self or another (KILL criminal) To maliciously attack (KILL victim) To follow orders (KILL enemies) To euthanize (KILL sick or severely injured animals) of course there are also non life ending purposes they end up fullfilling as well, though granted these functions are not the original intent, many have since been built to fulfill them: To target practice/plink (Entertain) To collect (Decorate) To twi

You really should look up words you dont understand before you accuse someone of using it incorrectly. But thats fine I will take on the impossible task of educating you: in·ti·mate 2 [in-tuh-meyt] [/url] verb (used with object), in·ti·mat·ed, in·ti·mat·ing.1.to indicate or make known indirectly; hint; imply; suggest. Zoo with everyday that passes I am more and more convinced that you suffer from a severe learning disorder.

You are a special kind of stupid arent you. The United States isnt even in the top 60. World Murder Rates. My Karibiner 98k will go through a frying pan easily.

So you are intimating that I am unintelligent about the history of the Constitution. You are wrong and you are unintelligent about the NRA and about me. I see...so If i chose a more dangerous weapon that would make the argument more plausible is that what you are saying?

actually a lot of times they just steal whole locked safes in houses they burglarize then subsequently open the safe. Perhaps you feel if a criminal steals a knife or a sword or a baseball; bat that the owner should bee held accountable for any crime committed with their stolen property hmm?

I wouldnt be opposed to them arming themselves or carrying if they choose to, but as a mater of issuing them each a firearm, no. Thats retarded.

I think youre over shooting the low end. You can get a used 9mm compact semiauto for 80 bucks if you shop around. Granted I dont reccomend pawn shops, and I especially dont reccomend Jimenez or Cobra arms..let alone used...but it can be done. And new you can get a Hipoint C9 or a Gen1 Sccy for under 200...at least for now.

My favorite thing about this argument is that the people who want to take away my guns...dont have guns or are not willing to use them, ergo if they were to try, theyde be shot, so they dont try very hard. "Good, Bad, Im the guy with the gun." -Ash Williams, Army of Darkness.

fine, 26% of all homicides are accomplished through the use of knives, swords, and blunt instruments. How do you intend to regulate this? Aaaaaaaannnnddddd....go.

depends on the 9mm in question. If PRICE is your primary motivator but you still want reliability then you can get a Hipoint C9 pistol for about 125 bucks new with lifetime warranty thats +P rated. If you want something more concealable, Keltec, Sccy, et al make compact pistols with a little more polish and finish that are smaller for between 200 and 300 bucks. If you want a 9mm hi capacity handgun the CZ-75 or a Glock or a Smithandwesson might be a better choice, they usually go for between 400 and 600 bucks. If you want a 9mm carbine (Thats an "Assault rifle" that shoots 9mm) you can get a

It hasnt been. Worked quite well with nuclear weapons. And if everyone has the ability to kill you easily, well Ide imagine you might not want to piss that person off. Exactly. If you dont like guns, dont buy one. If you dont like others around you having guns, go to England. If you dont like the music, change the station, because telling the radio that rock is the devils music makes you look retarded. Ill top that, I can do MORE damage with a zip gun I made with 7 dollars worth of parts from home depot. Maybe we should make PIPE illegal! OH HEAVENS TO BETSY!!!!!!!

Why would you destroy a brick wall that way? Just because your respective skulls are more dense doesnt mean you should do such a thing... I already tried making this point, save yourself the frustration. sometimes, actually it is. more so, in fact, than it ISNT with autos.

Thats the Pot calling the newly fallen snow black.

there is that word again. it seems to be the prevailing argument against firearms. It is utterly flawed. More over I think anyone using it as an argument is, with respect to this issue, a f***ing moron and should not ever ever ever discuss this topic...such people do not NEED to vote, or waste oxygen by breathing.

Okay, try and follow along here...."Organization A" represents its members regardless of what monetary compensation they have given to the organization. We have no removed which organization is involved. we have done this because YOUR argument is that regardless of organization, that organization will only represent those people who give heavily. This means that, in your argument, WHICH organization discussed is irrelevant. I then brought up an organzation OTHER than the NRA. In this case the ACLU. An organization. One that is particularly well known to going to bat for people who

Your argument is money vs representation ergo the organization in question is irrelevant. The water is crystal clear.

LMFAO since when does he care about that?