nschur

Oooohhhh... Whitey is sooo tight with PIBO that he already knows what his new plan is and he has been sworn to secrecy.

But... But... But... That made the TEA PARTY AND ONLY THE TEA PARTY terrorists in your book. So do you still believe that the TEA Party (all by their itty bitty selves) held up the vote or do you now understand that there were many others on both sides (but mostly the Dems) that voted no and were all just as culpable as the Terroristic TEA Party? So now you are saying that you agreed with the TEA Party and are a terrorist as well as them. You just continue to miss the part where because of the Dems, The GOP Lost half of their vote as well as 22% of the Overall vote. Half

Here is a hint Whitey... The negotiations exposed deep fissures within both parties. In the end, 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats backed the deal, and 66 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted against it. But Republicans and Democrats alike made clear they were not happy swallowing the agreement, which was struck late Sunday between the bipartisan leadership of Congress and President Obama. http://www.nytimes.c...?pagewanted=all Then we have 95 of 190 Dems voted against it and 23 of 40 TEA Party candidates voted for it So 50% of those PESKY Dems are Terrorists as wel

And did the house Dems vote with or against the TEA party? That is a real simple question.

No... Not even close. I asked you to explain what YOUR quote had to do with the conversation. Hence WHAT WAS THE POINT of the post. Did you try to imply something? If you did, the implication was totally missing. Are you incapable of answering a direct question? And no some links to what Reagan did does nothing to tell me WHAT YOU (Whitey) are thinking. Reagan took office in 1981. The quote you posted referenced 2000 - 2008 with no mention of the Reagan years. Did I answer you question about taxes directly (twice) or not? Did I link to some other article that drones on about what othe

>> :pardon: :pardon:

I did answer your question. See comment on fire tax. And I will support prudent expenditures to keep on needed staff. I also under stand that I AM CURRENTLY PAYING LESS IN TAXES for the same (well roughly) services I get. My opposition to the prior tax increases was in the rampant uncheck and unfunded and sometimes unnecessary expansions under the prior administration and their attempts to conceal the increases. So... YES Raise the mils I will not scream like a little girl as you do. I know I am paying less now than before and do not expect the county to cover ALL the lost revenues

Then you will love this one http://www.npr.org/2...vs-bush-on-debt Debt when PIBO took office $10.626 trillion Debt as of Jan 2011 $14.071 Trillion Added debt under PIBO $3.445 trillion in 735 days Currently $14.634 Trillion That's another $563 Billion since January WTG!!! PIBO

Here is a good article about the LEAD UP to the housing crisis. http://rightamerican...down-time-line/ I liked this part... Schweizer also illuminates on a long-forgotten class-action lawsuit filed in 1994 by three young trial lawyers, one of whom just happens to be sitting in the Oval Office today as president. The case was Selma S. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Federal Savings Bank. In the suit, Obama and his colleagues claimed in the suit that Citibank had had rejected loan applications by the plaintiffs simply because they were black, or because they lived in predomi

And what is your point? I need to know what YOU are thinking about this in order to discuss it. Trust me I read the quote. In short I provided you with what you requested and you give me this and Say "so... Look at this". Is that supposed to be your arguement for or against something? This is a typical Democrat response to something they don't want to see. You sure do like to attack me because I work for a local government, Which BTW keeps a balanced budget. How about you trying to stay on topic and not attack people personally. And just so you know I supported the

I am NOT about to waste my time on Sun restating what we have covered in detail within the PF. Just go and look it up. But here are a few hints. Driving up the US debt http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/National-Debt-GDP-L.gif Energy policies EPA policies Healthcare reform and employer costs Basic economics and policy decisions and their effect on businesses Tax policies ALL of these we have been over and over. You are either ignoring them or are just trying to obfuscate the issues.

Seriously?!? Or are you just playing stupid? Let me get a group of 5th graders together and we will ask them for some examples of what agenda policies PIBO has pushed through and their effects on our economy and it's growth. Here is one for you Whitey. But everything is already out there but the Dems just refuse to acknowledge the facts. http://tjhancock.wor...ive-assessment/ T/hen this from wikki Fannie Mae and Freddie MacIn 2003, the Bush Administration attempted to create an agency to oversee Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The bill never made progress in Con

If his AGENDA goes against job creation, (Please see just about any article on why businesses are not hiring and who / what caused those issues) then of course he is to blame. Just the same as if his agendas were pro growth he would get the credit.

As with all things, there is a build up to a failure. Might I point out AGAIN my statement Notice the BOLDED part. I never claimed that there was a crisis under clinton. I was pointing out the fact that the government was just as much "out of the way" under Clinton. But like all good little Democrats, you just refuse to acknowledge any of the facts that hold your own party culpable. While I openly admit that under W. there were many GOP members that flat out refused to suppor W. in his attempts to try to slow down or mitigate this housing train wreck when AT LEAST HE ACKNOWLEDGED T

In the lead up to the housing crisis, the government was out of the way since Clinton expanded the rules "encouraging" lenders to give everyone who wanted one a new mortgage. As far as the Financial groups, they were following the rules set forth by the government and look what happened.

We get a dispatch for a nonemergency call (vehicle unlock). My station is directly on the corner of a "T" intersection. I pull the truck onto the ramp and wait for the fire fighter gaurding the door to get on the truck. While waiting there, I am observing the intersection prior to me pulling into it. As I watch it, I see a vehicle make a rather fast left turn to pass right in front of our ramp. As it turns a see a car door go flying off the right side of the vehicle. NO way!! I think. no accident or nothing, just a door go flying across the intersection. Well it did not take long for me to f

3rd. He is already bugging me about my camping supplies and getting him new stuff to go camping with. As a side note, we have 12 acres on the resevoir in Butts / Henry that has nothing but trees and a few deer stands on it to go camping on.

Just so long as he can run around with his hair on fire (not literally) we'll be ok.

That info is best left to PMs

In Kindergarten the Principal had a door sensor, chime installed on Dis. jr's classroom door because he would try to sneak out.

I'm iffy on this one. My Bootius Maximus is still sore from my ride to Helen and back on Wed. - have got to get a new seat and some highway bars / pegs.

And it is attitudes like that (no offense meant PM) that make me have to carry larger uninsured / under insured premiums which cost ME extra. Basically when you hit my 2011 Tahoe and total it (if you carry state minimums of 15/30/10) your insurance company will only pay $10,000 to me for the loss of my vehicle. But since I, as a knowledgable and responsible person, have increased my limits. I carry 100/300/100 for liability plus uninsured motorist for an additional $100k COVERAGE LIMITS DEDUCTIBLE PREMIUM Automobile Liability Insurance Not Applicable $107.00 . Bodily Injur

That truck is hard to miss. Hopefully it will be found soon.

While I understand that, there is a world of difference between that and managing a household's finance. I do not think that the comparison is the same in this instance. JMHO