nschur

The term "gore" probably originates from the dressmaker's term for a triangular piece of cloth.Many road gores are created as a result of a surveying gore Wiki

Please tell us oh wise one, How EXACTLY would YOU change the gore / turn lanes at 92 and Macland and 92 and 278? This ought to be fun...

Sorry to say but this was likely the response to our favorite Paulding driver. She follows that route and SGT. Gurley said they would be watching / adding extra traffic enforcement in those areas. http://paulding.com/forum/index.php/topic/279802-sgt-b-gurley/page__p__3552500__fromsearch__1?do=findComment&comment=3552500

I only travel that way once every 3rd day when I leave the sation. I do not generally follow it eastward but stay on 92s through hiram. I made an exception before and altered the route to pick up Poplar from Mars Hill just to see. But hey... I'm always up for a meet and greet. Just say when.

Note to LEOs... The best locations to witness her driving that I know of are 92S @ East Paulding, 92S @ Macland, Poplar @278, 278 @ Florence and Florence @ 278. Those intersections are where she typically pulls these kind of "stunts". Makes kind of miss my LEO days... Well maybe a little but not too much.

OOPS... My bad. Thanks Grumps and sorry SGT. Gurley. I'll fix it when I get home from teaching te children at the Safety Village. Unless a Mod wants to fix it first.

WTF are you babbling about. Is it not ok to realize that some folks are very sensitive to the issue of race and that one only wishes to bring up the issue of race for a very specific purpose which is not meant to insult anyone. And in theis case the driver of the vehicle I observed was a Black Female which means that if the driver of the 2nd vehicle were anything but, THEN they are NOT the same driver. While if it was then there is a POSSIBILITY they are the same but not a given. It really is that simple. How about you just go take a LOOONG walk off a short peir.

And that is your right. However, you SHOULD respect the fact that the business OWNERS do not feel as you do and have gone to the added lengths to provide them with a special parking spot. And as such you should respect the fact that the intended persons this spot was designated for DOES NOT INCLUDE YOU. It is as simple as that. It is common courtesy. Have a nice day and park in any of those spots you wish as it is not illegal.

We had another topic pop up about a bad driver on the E-W Conn. And the previous topic came up. The question was raised if she was still around and could this one be her as well. I can definately say that the first driver is still here and driving the same vehicle. Her driving is as predictable as the sunrise. While on the way home from work I was thinking about her especially as our paths cross often so I was looking for her vehicle. She did not disappoint. While I was SB on 92 at Macland, she came SB as well, crossed the double yellow and proceeded to the left turn crossing over the opposing

But they are still disabilities resulting from a choice right? They could have opted not to have the surgeries right? And no I do not know you. I can not say with certainty that you are a total @$$ but I can say with great certainty that in this case, your attitude most definately indicates that you are. I guess you do not like pregnant women. Would you not vacate your seat on the bus, train in a waiting area for one either? I know I would. And before you answer that you would, please give us the reason that you believe it would be different.

http://paulding.com/forum/index.php/topic/270836-to-the-gold-chrysler-sb-on-92-at-east-paulding-dr/ The post from the previous woman ith pictures.

It is not the same vehicle or tag. I was begining to wonder if she sold the 300M and bought a different car to throw the SO off her scent. Sure does sound like her though. Not to bring up race but if this lady is not a minority, then they are not the same person.

Bless his heart... He is having such a hard time with the concept that the store chose to provide them with the spot and it is not up to HIM to choose whether or not the store had a right to try to make the lives of these women a little less "uncomfortable". Next thing you know he will be saying that someone who "voluntarily" had a leg removed or open heart surgery to save their life doesn't derserve a handicapped tag either.

Heck, I took the carts out of the corral and tried to bring them into Target... I just got a little distracted on the way in.

I made BBQ split chicken breasts, rice pilaf, steamed broc. and caulf. with dinner rolls for the guys at te station. Now one of the guys is making brownies.

There are guidelines that must be adhered to and leaving room to pass is one of them, but yes they can. As far as being called an @$$, I never called YOU one. I said anyone who knowingly parked in said spot was and if you don't then you wouldn't be. Got it?

Still legal to park in front of your home for up to 5 days. And parking in a spot specifically designated by the store for prgnant women / new moms, while legal, is very inconsiderate. End of story.You do have the right to be as inconsiderate as you like in that case but I would laugh my but of if a pregnant woman double parked behind you. Now ask yourself, what are the chances of her getting cited or towed for that. Go do the research if you like. And the STORE has decided that THEY ARE INDEED more special than you are and it IS THEIR lot and THEIR right to do so. If they decided to give you

Your true nature is showing. That is not very considerate and most definately not being a Gentleman. So tell me, how would you like all the neighbors parking in front of your home all the time? Most of the time it would be entirely legal and parking in your own driveway could be considered a choice as well.

They chose to have the baby true. The store also chose to provide them a closer spot as a courtesy. There is no law that requires compliance with that spot or the employee of the month spot. That being said, anyone who knowing parks in those spots is a self absorbed @$$. The same as the person who knowing parks in the fire lane or handicapped spots. I have been know to surround an unattended vehicle parked in the drive lanes with buggies when I went in at Target. When I came out there were even more pushed around it. That person now has to take the extra time to move all of those away from

I invite you to follow up on what Democratic campaigne Stratagist Bob Beckler just said about this incident with HC. Even he stated that these kind of BASELESS "unprovable accusations came out all the time, but we never ran with them because there was no proof". He also stated that this kind of stuff did not used to happen but is becomimg more and more common. Go ahead and check out the clip from tonight's Hannity segment with him. Sounds like he just busted your theorey to pieces there EmS.

Please prove me wrong. No one in 1950 had ever seen a man on the moon either. Doesn't mean it never happened. And just because you do not know of any does not mean they never happened. And as far as that goes, those on the far left NEVER cease to surprise me with the lengths that they will go to take down a conservative political opponent. And yes I'm sure there are those on the right that might do things like that as well.

So if the Koch brothers bribed / paid 100 women (who have all been unemployed for the last 13 years) $1 million to all lie and come forward stating that Obama had sexually harrassed them, then he too would be guilty and you should never vote for him right??? As far as the settlements go, it is the very same thing. Lawsuits are filed all the time where a business or wealthy person just looks at the costs of proving themselves innocent. Then they offer up a settlement that costs them less that the fees would have been and the person goes away. It happens all day everyday in business, civil and

Hearsay is also inadmissable in court for good reasons. Heck... I could accuse Gloria Alred of sexually assaulting me after being alone in an elevator with her. Then have my buddies Moe, Larry and Curley all swear that I told them about the incident. Then she would be guilty right??? :rolleyes: edited to add This was a follow up to TC's comment, not a respose to her.

I never said she lied. Call me skeptical. Even with the signed affidavates, I am still logical enough to understand that enough $$$ could persuade many to lie about almost anything. Look at Justin Bieber, he is being accused of being that girls "baby daddy". I say if Cain is innocent then he should file suit. That would prove to many his sincerity in this matter.

Not seeking monetary damages or criminal prosecution but a has the likes of Gloria A. as an attorney?!? Nope... She is not paying that bill. I wonder who is? Personally, I would like to see HC take charge of the situation and file a counter suit for defamation. He can definately prove the injury to him. And providing no supporting evidence from her then he has a slam dunk case. JMHO http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html [/url]Public Figures Under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court