Jump to content

Recent Topics Recent Topics

Photo
- - - - -

Cedarcrest residents see widening plan harming Paulding area's residential nature


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Lady Raider

Lady Raider

    Super Icon

  • +MPS extra
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 77,792 posts

Posted 04 April 2019 - 06:01 PM

A meeting is planned by late June between county officials and residents concerned about a planned future widening of Cedarcrest Road.

Residents near the northeast Paulding road recently told county officials March 28 how they felt about the planned widening of the road, which has seen a major increase in daily traffic in recent years.

One resident, Jim Hoover, said he believed most did not favor the current design for widening from two to four lanes with a grass and concrete median.

 

“I feel like it’s being shoved down our throats and nobody cares,” Hoover told county leaders at an open meeting March 28.

Two new roundabout intersections and an additional traffic signal are part of early plans for the 3.3-mile section between Harmony Grove Church Road and the Cobb County line.

Hoover and others said the widening will harm the residential nature of the area.

“It’s not your grandchildren that have to get from one side of Cedarcrest to the other,” Hoover said.

A $2.5 million design of the SPLOST- and state-funded project began in early 2018.

 

However, construction is not planned to begin until April 2023, Paulding DOT records showed.

The March 28 open meeting was billed as focusing on general county issues. County elected officials introduced themselves and top government officials described their departments’ functions and current projects.

However, after County Chairman Dave Carmichael asked for questions, most in the sometimes raucous crowd appeared to be Cedarcrest Road area residents with questions about the planned widening.

Speaker after speaker questioned the need for the widening and told about its potential negative impact on the fast-growing residential areas around the road.

Paulding DOT director George Jones, who fielded most of the questions, said the daily traffic count on the road had grown from about 800 in the late 1990s to 15,000 vehicles per day now.

 

“As a traffic engineer, when you look at numbers like that, you’re going to have more growth in the future,” Jones said. “People keep moving into this area.”

He predicted traffic will become more congested on the corridor if not widened to allow more volume.

“Basically, the way the traffic is going to grow, it’s needed,” he said. “I’m sorry, that’s just the way it is.”

County Operations Director Scott Greene said the county government worked with neighborhood developer Cousins Properties before neighborhoods were built. Designs included space for a four-lane Cedarcrest Road, he said.

Greene, who is former Paulding DOT director, said any plans for realignment of curves and removal of “big, heavy” trees along the corridor was a positive thing for motorists. Most fatal wrecks involve a single vehicle leaving a road and hitting a tree, he said.

 

Smaller trees could be planted along the road which are not as dangerous to motorists, Greene said.

“The road’s got to be rebuilt to modern standards if it’s going to be safe,” he said.

He said comments from residents at a future meeting could be incorporated into plans for landscaping and other parts of the road.

“It’s too early to say we’ve rejected anything,” he said.

Area resident Randy Gault said he wanted to “help you make it right” with a design that retains the area’s residential character.

County Commissioner Brian Stovear, whose district includes Cedarcrest, said residents and county officials “need to sit down together.”

“We want to make this the best project we can,” Stover said.

He said he planned to organize a public meeting with county road engineers within 90 days and advertise it on either the county website or neighborhood social media.


"The most dangerous place in the world to be is "Between a Mother and her Child"

Posted Image


In Loving Memory of My Daddy and Mama
3-29-08
and 10-24-2012


*say what you mean, and mean what you say*

#2 The Sound Guy

The Sound Guy

    Super Icon

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,141 posts

Posted 17 April 2019 - 08:16 AM

The traffic is there already and more is coming, the safest thing to do is make sure the road can handle it.   I say that as someone who lives  in a subdivision off of Dabbs Bridge Raceway, which is also planned to  be widened "someday" as it's the only direct East/West road in the northwestern part of the county from 61 to US41 and I-75 until you get to Old Alabama in Bartow county.  DBR has had the speed limit increased from 35 MPH to 45 MPH in a bid to increase capacity and reduce the number of illegal passes, but that has had minimal benefit in my mind.  It's still a road where one slow driver will have idiots passing in a no passing zone and endangering everyone on the road, just 10-15 MPH faster than before. 

 

A four lane road can have speed limits that are much lower than a two lane road and carry a greater number of cars and it gives a way for slower drivers to be passed without endangering other drivers making it much safer than what is there now. 

 

Widening while following a county wide traffic plan is the best way to go. 


The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln

 

DISCLAIMER: The information and opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily the opinions of the author and may be denied or disregarded at a later date. Reading of this paragraph constitutes as agreement on part of reader not to hold author responsible for any damaging effects resulting from reading and agreeing with anything said in this post; furthermore reader waives all future claims resulting from changes in law which may render this disclaimer null and void. This disclaimer is valid in all states with the exception of those states which have laws forbidding the existence of this disclaimer, and in states where such laws exist the reader agrees to read this disclaimer in a state where this disclaimer is binding.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Recent Topics Recent Topics