Jump to content
Paulding.com
Sign in to follow this  
DomesticViolenceByProxy

Are Children Safe Tonny S. Beavers' watch?

Recommended Posts

Dr. Craig Childress illustrates how a toxic parent hides behind a child to nullify court orders. Does child psychological abuse happen on Tonny S. Beavers watch? #OnBeaversWatch

Edited by Domestic Violence by Proxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge Beavers is an honorable man, he's been on the bench as Chief Judge here for years. To keep attacking him because you lost your case is fair game. After all, he's a politician and it's ok to be a sore loser... but I'd say his rulings are fair and just. The criminals don't like him, so he must be doing something right!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge Beavers is an honorable man, he's been on the bench as Chief Judge here for years. To keep attacking him because you lost your case is fair game. After all, he's a politician and it's ok to be a sore loser... but I'd say his rulings are fair and just. The criminals don't like him, so he must be doing something right!

 

Honorable man ?

 

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/husband-indicted-in-murder-of-his-wife-wednesday-still-hasnt-been-arrested/633202534

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge Beavers is an honorable man, he's been on the bench as Chief Judge here for years. To keep attacking him because you lost your case is fair game. After all, he's a politician and it's ok to be a sore loser... but I'd say his rulings are fair and just. The criminals don't like him, so he must be doing something right!

You should be more cautious about who you align yourself with. I talk about the cases of others more than my own. I have read and sat in on many of his cases and I will sit in on more. I haven't even posted about some of the cases. It just isn't worth the risk of potentially grave consequences from one or more of the litigants.

 

Many of the chief judge's rulings are just. But how many "troubling" rulings are tolerable? Whether deliberately or negligently, how many times should a judge be allowed to get it wrong? What constitutes a "culture of corruption"?

 

So that you are better informed, I suggest you attend special set hearings and hearings during civil motion court on Wednesdays after 2PM. Hearings in the morning that are not special set typically don't have irregularities because the courtroom is still full of witnesses. You want to catch the last 2 hearings of the day.

 

If this were your daughter, would you be calling Tonny S. Beavers an honorable man? Just about everything in this video was reported in the news.

Edited by Domestic Violence by Proxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge Beavers is an honorable man, he's been on the bench as Chief Judge here for years. To keep attacking him because you lost your case is fair game. After all, he's a politician and it's ok to be a sore loser... but I'd say his rulings are fair and just. The criminals don't like him, so he must be doing something right!

 

Additionally, I have reviewed Judge Beavers hiring practices. In all of his decades on the bench I have yet to find a minority employee. Judge Bucci has been on the bench 3-4 years and he has had 2 minorities work in his courtroom. I do find Tonny S. Beavers hiring practices and comments in court, regarding racial sensitivity, to be archaic at best. I have a little more on this but I'm not ready to release it.

 

It is interesting that Judge Beavers employed a clerk that had domestic violence and other troubling incidents in his past but he doesn't seem to hire minorities.

 

How does someone that pleads the 5th and has improper ex-parte communication with Judge Beavers get a protective order against another person with no history of violence?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call him out. Challenge him to a duel. Loser leaves town.

 

Feet first. :rofl:

 

Seriously, this DVBP guy has about worn out this nonsense. This is an obsession that has me concerned for the Judge's safety.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Feet first. :rofl:

 

Seriously, this DVBP guy has about worn out this nonsense. This is an obsession that has me concerned for the Judge's safety.

 

My concerns about Tonny Beavers troubling decisions are genuine and well documented. I have yet to see anyone post anything to refute what I have presented or offer a case in contrast. My concerns are for the safety of children. If you knew any better, you would have similar concerns.

Edited by Domestic Violence by Proxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That all you find in this is humor in his name is truly sad. I don't think this young mother's family finds anything funny. Having a history of domestic violence in a household and after being charged by police with malice murder and cruelty to children, Tonny Beavers reduced the charges against the accused to simple battery. Then after a grand jury takes matters out of the Chief Judge's hands and indicts the accused to reinstate the charges, Tonny Beavers sets bail so the accused can bond out for $1700.00 or so? We are coming up on the 1st anniversary of this woman's death and her family is not certain she will see justice. According to news reports of the autopsy, her spine was severed at the brain stem due to blunt force trauma. Sound like charges should be reduced to simple battery to you?

Edited by Domestic Violence by Proxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn’t there a better, more productive way you can vent your displeasure than by ranting here for years on end?

 

 

His is an obsession that seriously needs psychiatric evaluation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

His is an obsession that seriously needs psychiatric evaluation.

 

You are ill informed at best. What is worse is that you are willfully so. Georgia is so corrupt that the JQC and GBI will do nothing about the corrupt judges in Georgia. Lester Tate resigned because of the corruption.

 

His replacement abused her power and nothing was done. The only way to bring about change is cast light on the misdeeds of judges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn’t there a better, more productive way you can vent your displeasure than by ranting here for years on end?

Worse still, he's probably not helping his case any with his behavior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worse still, he's probably not helping his case any with his behavior.

 

My case has long since ended and I now no longer live in his jurisdiction. I am an advocate for children who continues to expose the truth so that future generations do not suffer. At great personal risk, I receive no accolades or compensation for my efforts. For anyone to willfully choose ignorance speaks to that person's character.

 

I've had to go before Beavers 3Xs to fight illegal protective orders issued by Tonny S. Beavers that were being used as gag orders, losing the first 2. Case law by the Supreme Court of Georgia dictates that this not be done.

 

When you tell the truth people will use the law to silence you. Defamation as a legal remedy has a high cost, including counter claims and discovery. It's much easier to use a protective order because that goes to a judge's discretion. You cannot fight abuse of discretion because the process is expensive if you are represented, $10-20,000 or more. By the time your appeal is heard, the order expires.

 

How does Tonny Beavers issue a protective order when he had improper ex-parte communication? Why did he not recuse himself? That could be considered collusion by many. The other party perjured herself and pleaded the 5th Amendment. What crime did the other party commit that she would incriminate herself and still receive a bogus protective order? Why was the case the last heard of the day when the courtroom was cleared of potential witnesses?

 

A protective order is a shield to protect the innocent not a weapon to be wielded to protect the true abuser and injure whistle blowers.

 

 

In a 1993 newsletter, Elaine Epstein, then-president of the Massachusetts Bar Association, has remarked, Everyone knows that restraining orders and orders to vacate are granted to virtually all who apply…In many cases, allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage [in divorce and child custody],” and a 1995 study of Massachusetts restraining orders found that under 50% are justified by even allegations of physical violence with some restraining orders being granted on the basis of vague, undefined fears.[7] In contrast, a study from the San Francisco area found that in 63% of cases where restraining orders are issued, the allegations are corroborated at least in part.[8] https://en.wikipedia...straining_order

 

Edited by Domestic Violence by Proxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My case has long since ended and I now no longer live in his jurisdiction. I am an advocate for children who continues to expose the truth so that future generations do not suffer. At great personal risk, I receive no accolades or compensation for my efforts. To willfully choose ignorance speaks to character.

 

I've had to go before Beavers 3Xs to fight illegal protective orders issued by Tonny S. Beavers that were being used as gag orders, losing the first 2. When you tell the truth people will use the law to silence you. Defamation as a legal remedy has a high cost, including counter claims and discovery. It's much easier to use a protective order because that goes to a judge's discretion. You cannot fight abuse of discretion because the process is expensive if you are represented, $10-20,000 or more. By the time your appeal is heard, the order expires.

 

How does Tonny Beavers issue a protective order when he had improper ex-parte communication? Why did he not recuse himself? That could be considered collusion by many. The other party perjured herself and pleaded the 5th Amendment. What crime did the other party commit that she would incriminate herself and still receive a bogus protective order? Why was the case the last heard of the day when the courtroom was cleared of potential witnesses?

 

A protective order is a shield to protect the innocent not a weapon to be wielded to protect the true abuser and injure whistle blowers.

 

 

You don't come across as an advocate; you come across as a very bitter and angry man with the potential for hostilities. And frankly, a bit of a nut.

 

I don't know anything about the circumstances of your case, so I won't comment on the specifics. But if you're anything in real life like your persona here; I can see how that would cause you problems in a custody case.

 

Please don't even start with the "when people ignore" diatribe. All we know of this situation are your constant and obsessive rants on this forum. There are two sides to every story and the truth is usually in the middle. Meaning...we don't know enough about this situation to take sides.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't come across as an advocate; you come across as a very bitter and angry man with the potential for hostilities. And frankly, a bit of a nut.

 

I don't know anything about the circumstances of your case, so I won't comment on the specifics. But if you're anything in real life like your persona here; I can see how that would cause you problems in a custody case.

 

Please don't even start with the "when people ignore" diatribe. All we know of this situation are your constant and obsessive rants on this forum. There are two sides to every story and the truth is usually in the middle. Meaning...we don't know enough about this situation to take sides.

 

I rarely if ever speak of my own case until you bring it up. I speak about others cases. To help yourself sometimes you must help others. I see now why you look like you embrace corruption. No matter the subject you think your opinion stands up to facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have reading comprehension issues.

 

Facts do not cease to exist because you choose to ignore them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Facts do not cease to exist because you choose to ignore them.

As I stated...I don't know the facts of your case, which is why I didn't comment on any specifics. I merely made a general observation about how you come across.

 

Having said...I'm sorry you lost your children. As a father myself, there is nothing that would hurt me more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I stated...I don't know the facts of your case, which is why I didn't comment on any specifics. I merely made a general observation about how you come across.

 

Having said...I'm sorry you lost your children. As a father myself, there is nothing that would hurt me more.

The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about and refuse to investigate. - Dr. Wayne Dyer

 

I didn't lose all of my children, only the youngest. IMO, the youngest was groomed and gaslighted into choosing the path of least resistance. The mother actually refuses regular contact with her 3rd daughter because she chose to live with me. I've posted much about it and added the documentation from the case including the case #s. It is rare that one side should offer the whole truth but I assure you if I were dishonest or "a nut" I'd be incarcerated or suffered some unfortunate "mishap" by now. I believe they would if they could. I will not conform to or normalize the abnormal that occurs on Judge Tonny S. Beavers' watch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm sorry you lost any of them. It's very sad when a family is broken up, especially if/when it can be prevented.

But again...I don't know the details of the situation, so I'm not going to take sides at this point. Hopefully, time will allow you an opportunity to bring your children back together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm sorry you lost any of them. It's very sad when a family is broken up, especially if/when it can be prevented.

 

But again...I don't know the details of the situation, so I'm not going to take sides at this point. Hopefully, time will allow you an opportunity to bring your children back together.

 

Thanks for your compassionate words. I speak out so that like your signature says, "...free speech will destroy lies." Maybe it will maybe not. What I do know is children are being harmed in another failed government system.

 

If I waited years from now to say something people would say why are you speaking up now why didn't you say something back then. That is how abuse goes on for so long and people say why didn't someone speak up?! Just like those USA gymnastics girls that were sexually abused for over a decade, one after another because no one would speak up. If nothing else, I can say I spoke up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.