ridge rd retiree Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 4 juveniles shooting off fireworks from a speeding car ,area of 303 camden woods drive -/-2 of the juveniles are black males - now are headed towards the s/d entrance Link to post Share on other sites
michelay1000 Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Wow, so many wrong parts to that sentence. I hope they get a monster spanking. Link to post Share on other sites
ridge rd retiree Posted July 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 officer is out with the juveniles at 136 camden woods drive Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernScarlett Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 officer is out with the juveniles at 136 camden woods drive The person that called in about the fireworks called back and said the guys hide the fireworks in a mailbox and just pasted in front of them.I guess they heard the officer coming. Glad he stopped them. Link to post Share on other sites
ridge rd retiree Posted July 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 officer is 10-59 with the juveniles .............................. officer is out with the juveniles at 140 camden woods drive ............................................... Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernScarlett Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Now the officer is taking 2 male to a residence on Camdon Dr. Link to post Share on other sites
ridge rd retiree Posted July 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 thanks for the on scene info, it is appreciated Link to post Share on other sites
ridge rd retiree Posted July 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 ..................... officer just advised 10-86 he is 10-76 to 361 camden woods drive Link to post Share on other sites
bmcdawg Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 ok....Let get our facts straight guys...and I'm not directing this at Ridge Rd retiree because I know you are just posting what's coming over the scanner, BUT here's the facts.There were NO fireworks shot from a speeding car. Actually, there wasn't a speeding car either. There were 2 teens shooting fireworks. That's the only part of the report that is factual. EVERYTHING else is fiction....so let's chill out on the necessary spankings that are in order folks. Now the officer is taking 2 male to a residence on Camdon Dr.Do you live in Camden Woods?And thanks to you Ridge Rd Retiree for doing what you do to inform us of what's going on. Link to post Share on other sites
TnT Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 ok....Let get our facts straight guys...and I'm not directing this at Ridge Rd retiree because I know you are just posting what's coming over the scanner, BUT here's the facts.There were NO fireworks shot from a speeding car. Actually, there wasn't a speeding car either. There were 2 teens shooting fireworks. That's the only part of the report that is factual. EVERYTHING else is fiction....so let's chill out on the necessary spankings that are in order folks.Do you live in Camden Woods? So you are saying what is coming across the scanner is not true???? What makes you think we are to believe what you are saying is true? Link to post Share on other sites
bmcdawg Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Because I spoke to the officer AND my wife, who was driving the car that was alleged to be speeding, which wasn't. I was just setting the facts straight, plus a little perterbed about people that jump to what they think punishments should be without getting facts confirmed instead of just hearing what was reported by somebody else. Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernScarlett Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 These reports came over scanner dude chill. Link to post Share on other sites
bmcdawg Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 I mentioned that I was giving the facts of what actually happened due to the fact that it came over the scanner inaccurately, hence including the following on my original post..."and I'm not directing this at Ridge Rd retiree because I know you are just posting what's coming over the scanner"....did you not read that part? Link to post Share on other sites
1stimemom Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 I mentioned that I was giving the facts of what actually happened due to the fact that it came over the scanner inaccurately, hence including the following on my original post..."and I'm not directing this at Ridge Rd retiree because I know you are just posting what's coming over the scanner"....did you not read that part? was it your kid that got in trouble?? you seem awfully defensive about something that really shouldn't matter....so what if your wife was mistaken for the perps?? it was a mistake and she's safe at home now, right?? Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernScarlett Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 I mentioned that I was giving the facts of what actually happened due to the fact that it came over the scanner inaccurately, hence including the following on my original post..."and I'm not directing this at Ridge Rd retiree because I know you are just posting what's coming over the scanner"....did you not read that part? If you are talking to me yea I saw what you put. Did you even read what I put. Right or wrong it was reported on scanner.If it was reported wrong on scanner. You got your point across. You still need to chill. It is only a scanner report.Wrong or wright that was what dispatcher said. Link to post Share on other sites
bmcdawg Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 If you are talking to me yea I saw what you put. Did you even read what I put. Right or wrong it was reported on scanner.If it was reported wrong on scanner. You got your point across. You still need to chill. It is only a scanner report.Wrong or wright that was what dispatcher said. I'm gonna let this go as you are not being logical. I reread your post, which told me to chill after I acknowledged that the report came from the scanner and I offered the actual facts of what happened. I wasn't jumping on the original post or poster....he's just reporting what was reported. I corrected the report as I first hand talked to all parties involved. Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernScarlett Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 I'm gonna let this go as you are not being logical. I reread your post, which told me to chill after I acknowledged that the report came from the scanner and I offered the actual facts of what happened. I wasn't jumping on the original post or poster....he's just reporting what was reported. I corrected the report as I first hand talked to all parties involved. Glad you are letting it go.Cause that is what scanner reports are for. To inform people of what is being reported.Even if it is reported on scanner wrong. Link to post Share on other sites
bmcdawg Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 was it your kid that got in trouble?? you seem awfully defensive about something that really shouldn't matter....so what if your wife was mistaken for the perps?? it was a mistake and she's safe at home now, right?? My kid was 1 of the kids that was talked to by the officer regarding the alleged action. Everybody is safe and sound. Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites
jmd Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 I mentioned that I was giving the facts of what actually happened due to the fact that it came over the scanner inaccurately, hence including the following on my original post..."and I'm not directing this at Ridge Rd retiree because I know you are just posting what's coming over the scanner"....did you not read that part? Maybe you should check some mailboxes to see if its truly inaccurate. When the person whose mailbox it is in checks the mailbox, guess who will be the first to get the knock on their door? Link to post Share on other sites
bmcdawg Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Glad you are letting it go.Cause that is what scanner reports are for. To inform people of what is being reported.Even if it is reported on scanner wrong. Lady, you got a MAJOR chip on your shoulder. Link to post Share on other sites
hart408 Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Lady, you got a MAJOR chip on your shoulder. She's actually a very nice person. I have met her several times. Bringing more attention to this is going to have more people listening to the scanner archives. Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernScarlett Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 She's actually a very nice person. I have met her several times. Bringing more attention to this is going to have more people listening to the scanner archives.Thank you CeeJay.I love to listen to the scanner. I wish more people would. Lady, you got a MAJOR chip on your shoulder. You so funny bmcdawg Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoMom Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Sounds like your kid did something stupid &/or has stupid friends (as kids do) and their behavior got your wife involved. If your kid did something to warrant anyone calling the cops, maybe you should be dealing with him instead of fussing on here. Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Raider Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Dang.... Link to post Share on other sites
Catch22 Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Sounds like your kid did something stupid &/or has stupid friends (as kids do) and their behavior got your wife involved. If your kid did something to warrant anyone calling the cops, maybe you should be dealing with him instead of fussing on here. Yeah, what she said!! The bit dog barks first!! Ever heard that saying?? Link to post Share on other sites
UsborneArynn Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Sounds like your kid did something stupid &/or has stupid friends (as kids do) and their behavior got your wife involved. If your kid did something to warrant anyone calling the cops, maybe you should be dealing with him instead of fussing on here. Tell us how you really feel Seriously though, I was thinking the same exact thing. I knew from the tone of earlier posts that the perps (at least as reported on the scanner) must have been related to him. Link to post Share on other sites
michelay1000 Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Yeah, what she said!! The bit dog barks first!! Ever heard that saying?? I have Seriously though, I was thinking the same exact thing. I knew from the tone of earlier posts that the perps (at least as reported on the scanner) must have been related to him. I thought so too. By posting in such a defensive manner you just bring more attention to yourself. I doubt the thread would have gone beyond 10 posts without that post. I still don't think teenagers and fireworks are a good combination, even without the speeding car. Link to post Share on other sites
hart408 Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 The mother was apparently present during this situation. That is the biggest shame. Maybe stop your kids from doing stupid shiot instead lf trying to stop people from talking about it. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now