[NC-17]

Lady Raider, on 07 November 2009 - 01:58 PM, said:

well dang I did not even get to vote on anything LOL

so we can still vote, it just does not show up in the profile? is that correct?

yep, you can vote on the post.

PraiseThee, on 07 November 2009 - 01:54 PM, said:

Now NC, that is not true. There are those on here that will do anything to tanish a person's character no matter what they say on this site. I can handle it but at the same time, some people who come here that are new may look at a person's "bad" reputation and form an opinion without even knowing the poster. There are those on here who act like they are in grade school and want to see who wins popularity contests whether they deserve it or not.

I don't really care if people like me or not. I am who I am. Either it accepted or it is not. I don't lose any sleep over it but I also feel that tearing down a person's character based on a personal vendetta, a hate-fest is going a bit far. I am sure others feel the same way. I have many friends outside of Pcom, and some on here and many of those knoe me that is all that matters to me. I am strong standing on some things in my life and that is what some like to bash on.

During this experiment, I did not issue any (-) on anyone.

bs. folks don't normally target other folks for vendetta's without some sort of provocation. posting history has much to do with the want/need/desire to tear down ones character.

like i said, chickens coming home to roost. talk enough smack, or anger the masses for long enough, and they'll build up an intolerance for *you.


*the collective you. not the personal you.

[JMT]

NC-17, on 07 November 2009 - 01:23 PM, said:

the votes work for the post. but don't show up as a total in the members profile. cause so many people cried about making enough enemies to earn a bad reputation.

I would simply say that this description doesn't accurately reflect everyone's thoughts on why it was wise to change the set-up.

[NC-17]

JMT, on 07 November 2009 - 06:52 PM, said:

I would simply say that this description doesn't accurately reflect everyone's thoughts on why it was wise to change the set-up.

thanks for weighing in.